UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the

Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment

(Amendment No.    )

Filed by the Registrant  x                            Filed by a Party other than the Registrant  ¨

Check the appropriate box:

¨Filed by the Registrant   þ
 Filed by a Party other than the Registrant   o
Check the appropriate box:

oPreliminary Proxy Statement
¨ oConfidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
þ
xDefinitive Proxy Statement
o
¨Definitive Additional Materials
o
¨Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12

ISABELLA BANK CORPORATION


(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)


(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

      Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):


ISABELLA BANK CORPORATION
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
xþNo fee required.
o
¨Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4) and 0-11.

 1)

Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:


 2)

Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:


 3)

Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):


 4)

Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:


5)Total fee paid:

¨      5) Total fee paid:


 oFee paid previously with preliminary materials.


¨ oCheck box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

 1)

Amount Previously Paid:


 2)

Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

3)

Filing Party:

4)

Date Filed:


      3) Filing Party:


      4) Date Filed:


SEC 1913 (02-02)

Persons who are to respond to the collection of information contained in this form are not required torespond unless the form displays a currently valid OMB control number.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

NOTICE OF THE ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
PROXY STATEMENT
General Information
Voting at the Meeting
Election of Directors
Director Nominees for Terms Ending in 2012
Current Directors with Terms Ending in 2010
Current Directors with Terms Ending in 2011
Corporate Governance
Director Independence
Committees of the Board of Directors and Meeting Attendance
Report of the Audit Committee
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Compensation Objectives
What the Compensation Programs are Designed to Reward
Elements of Compensation
Why Each of the Elements of Compensation is Chosen
How the Corporation Chose Amounts for Each Element
How Elements Fit into Overall Compensation Objectives
Compensation and Benefits Committee Report
Executive Officers
Summary Compensation Table
2008 Pension Benefits
2008 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation
Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control
Retirement
Death or Disability
Change in Control
Director Compensation
Compensation and Human Resource Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
Indebtedness of and Transactions with Management
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Fees for Professional Services Provided by Rehmann Robson P.C.
Pre-approval Policies and Procedures
Shareholder Proposals
Directors’ Attendance at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
Other Matters
As to Other Business Which May Come Before the Meeting
SUMMARY OF SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Dollars in thousands except per share amounts)
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Opearations
COMMON STOCK AND DIVIDEND INFORMATION
SHAREHOLDERS’ INFORMATION


ISABELLA BANK CORPORATION

401 N. Main St.
Mount

Mt. Pleasant, Michigan 48858

NOTICE OF THE ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

To Be Held May 5, 20091, 2012

Notice is hereby given that the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Isabella Bank Corporation will be held on Tuesday, May 5, 20091, 2012 at 5:00 p.m. Eastern StandardDaylight Time, at the Comfort Inn, 2424 S. Mission Street, MountMt. Pleasant, Michigan. The meeting is for the purpose of considering and acting upon the following:

following items of business:

1. The election of fourthree directors.

2. SuchTo transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting, or any adjournment or adjournments thereof.

The Board of Directors has fixed April 1, 2009March 28, 2012 as the record date for determination of shareholders entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the meeting or any adjournments thereof.

Your vote is important. Even if you plan to attend the meeting, please date and sign the enclosed proxy form, indicate your choice with respect to the matters to be voted upon, and return it promptly in the enclosed envelope. Note that if stock is held in more than one name, all parties should sign the proxy form.

By order of the Board of Directors

-s- DEBRA CAMPBELL

LOGO

Debra Campbell, Secretary

Dated: April 10, 2009

March 28, 2012


ISABELLA BANK CORPORATION

401 N. Main St
Mount

Mt. Pleasant, Michigan 48858

PROXY STATEMENT

General Information

This Proxy Statement is furnished in connection with the solicitation of proxies by the Board of Directors of Isabella Bank Corporation (the Corporation), a Michigan financial holding company, to be voted at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of the Corporation to be held on Tuesday, May 5, 20091, 2012 at 5:00 p.m. at the Comfort Inn, 2424 S. Mission Street, MountMt. Pleasant, Michigan, or at any adjournment or adjournments thereof, for the purposes set forth in the accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and in this Proxy Statement.

This Proxy Statement has been mailed on April 10, 20095, 2012 to all holders of record of common stock as of the record date. If a shareholder’s shares are held in the name of a broker, bank or other nominee, then that party should give the shareholder instructions for voting the shareholder’s shares.

Voting at the Meeting

The Board of Directors of the Corporation has fixed the close of business on April 1, 2009March 28, 2012 as the record date for the determination of shareholders entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Annual Meeting of Shareholders and any adjournment thereof. The Corporation has only one class of common stock and no preferred stock. As of April 1, 2009,March 28, 2012, there were 7,531,4727,614,742 shares of common stock of the Corporation outstanding. Each outstanding share entitles the holder thereof to one vote on each separate matter presented for vote at the meeting. Shareholders may vote on matters that are properly presented at the meeting by either attending the meeting and casting a vote or by signing and returning the enclosed proxy. If the enclosed proxy is executed and returned, it may be revoked at any time before it is exercised at the meeting. All shareholders are encouraged to date and sign the enclosed proxy, indicate their choice with respect to the matters to be voted upon, and return it to the Corporation.

The Corporation will hold the Annual Meeting of Shareholders if holders of a majority of the Corporation’s shares of common stock entitled to vote are represented in person or by proxy at the meeting. If a shareholder signs and returns the proxy, those shares will be counted to determine whether the Corporation has a quorum, even if the shareholder abstains or fails to vote on any of the proposals listed on the proxy.

If a

A shareholder’s shares are held inbroker may not vote on the nameelection of a nominee, anddirectors if the shareholder does not tellfurnish instructions for such proposals. A shareholder should use the nominee howvoting instruction card provided by the institution that holds his or her shares to instruct the broker to vote the shares (referred to as broker non-votes), thenor else the nominee can vote them as they see fit only on matters that are determined toshareholder’s shares will be routine and not on any other proposal. considered “broker non-votes.”

Broker non-votes will be countedare shares held by brokers or nominees as present to determine if a quorum exists but willwhich voting instructions have not be counted as present andbeen received from the beneficial owners or the persons entitled to vote those shares and the broker or nominee does not have discretionary voting power under rules applicable to broker-dealers. Under these rules, proposal one is not an item on any non-routine proposals.

which brokerage firms may vote in their discretion on behalf of their clients if such clients have not furnished voting instructions.

At this year’s annual meeting, shareholders will elect three directors to serve for a term of three years. In voting on the election of directors, directora shareholder may vote in favor of the nominees, receivingvote against or withhold votes as to all nominees, or vote against or withhold votes as to specific nominees. Directors are elected by a plurality of the votes cast at the meetingannual meeting. This means that the nominees receiving the greatest number of votes will be elected directors of the Corporation.elected. Shares not voted, including broker non-votes, have no effect on the election of directors.

ElectionProposal 1-Election of Directors

The Board of Directors currently consists of 12 members and is divided into three classes, with the directors in each class being elected for a term of three years. On April 27, 2011, Dianne C. Morey resigned as a member of the Corporation’s Board of Directors and the number of directors was reduced to 12. At the 2012 Annual Meeting of Shareholders fourthree directors, will be elected forRichard J. Barz, Sandra L. Caul, and W. Michael McGuire, whose terms ending withexpire at the annual meeting, of shareholders in 2012.

have been nominated for election through 2015 for the reasons described below.


Except as otherwise specified in the proxy, proxies will be voted for election of the four nominees named below.three nominees. If a nominee becomes unable or unwilling to serve, proxies will be voted for such other person, if any, as shall be designated by the Board of Directors. However, the Corporation’s management now knows of no reason to anticipate that this will occur. The fourthree nominees for election as directors who receive the greatest number of votes cast will be elected directors. Each of the nominees has agreed to serve as a director if elected.


1


Nominees for election and current directors are listed below. Also shown for each nominee and each current director is his or her principal occupation for the last five or more years, age and length of service as a director of the Corporation.

The Board of Directors unanimously recommends that shareholders vote FOR the election of each of the fourthree director nominees nominated by the Board of Directors.

Director’s Qualifications

The members of the Corporation’s Board of Directors (the Board) are all well qualified to serve on the Board and represent our shareholders’ best interest. As described below, under the caption “Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee”, the Board and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee (the “Nominating Committee”) select nominees to the Board to establish a Board that is comprised of members who:

Have extensive business leadership

Bring a diverse perspective and experience

Are independent and collegial

Have high ethical standards and have demonstrated sound business judgment

Are willing and able to commit the significant time and effort to effectively fulfill their responsibilities

Are active in and knowledgeable of their respective communities

Each director nominee along with the other directors brings these qualifications to the Board. They provide a diverse complement of specific business skills, experience, and knowledge including extensive financial and accounting experience, knowledge of banking, small business operating experience, and specific knowledge of customer market segments, including agriculture, oil and gas, health care, food and beverage, manufacturing, and retail.

The following describes the key qualifications each director brings to the Board, in addition to the general qualifications described above and the information included in the biographical summaries provided below.

Director

Professional
Standing
in Chosen
Field
Expertise
in  financial
or related
field
Audit
Committee
Financial
Expert
Civic and
community
involvement
Leadership
and team
building
skills
Diversity
by race,
gender, or
cultural
Geo-
graphical
diversity
FinanceTech-
nology
Market-
ing
Govern-
ance
Entre-
preneurial
skills
Human
Resources
Bank
business
segment
represent-
ation

David J. Maness

XXXXXX

Dennis P. Angner

XXXXXXX

Jeffrey J. Barnes

XXXXXX

Richard J. Barz

XXXXXXX

Sandra L. Caul

XXXXXX

James C. Fabiano

XXXXXXXX

G. Charles Hubscher

XXXXXX

Thomas L. Kleinhardt

XXXXXXX

Joseph LaFramboise

XXXXX

W. Joseph Manifold

XXXXXXX

W. Michael McGuire

XXXXXXXXX

Dale D. Weburg

XXXXXX

The following table identifies the individual members of our Board serving on each of these standing committees:

NominatingCompensation
and Corporateand Human

Director

AuditGovernanceResource

David J. Maness

XoXoXc,o

Dennis P. Angner

Jeffrey J. Barnes

XX

Richard J. Barz

Sandra L. Caul

X

James C. Fabiano

X

G. Charles Hubscher

XX

Thomas L. Kleinhardt

X

Joseph LaFramboise

XXX

W. Joseph Manifold

XcXX

W. Michael McGuire

XXcX

Dale D. Weburg

X

C — Chairperson

O — Ex-Officio

Director Nominees for Terms Ending in 20122015

Dennis P. AngnerRichard J. Barz (age 53)63) has been a director of Isabella Bank (the Bank) since 2000 and of the Corporation since 2000. He also serves as an ex-officio member of all2002. Mr. Barz has been employed by the Corporation since 1972 and has been Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation’s subsidiary Boards of DirectorsCorporation since January 1, 2010 and the Finance and Planning Committee. Mr. Angner also serves on the Board of Financial Group Information Services. Mr. Angner has been President and CEO of the CorporationBank since December 30, 2001. Prior to his appointment as PresidentMr. Barz has been very active in community organizations and CEO, he served as Executive Vice President of the Corporation. Mr. Angnerevents. He is the past Chairchairman of the Michigan Bankers Association and has served on the Central Michigan American Red Cross board for over 20 years.

David J. Maness(age 55) has been a directorCommunity Hospital Board of Directors, is the current chairman of the Middle Michigan Development Corporation since 2004,Board of Directors, and serves on the Audit Committee, the Compensationseveral boards and Human Resource Committeecommittees for Central Michigan University and is currently Chairperson on the Finance and Planning Committee. He also serves on the Board of Directors of Isabella Bank and is Chairperson of Financial Group Information Services. He is President of Maness Petroleum, a geological and geophysical consulting services company. Mr. Maness served as a school board member of the Mount Pleasant School board.
various volunteer organizations throughout mid-Michigan.

W. Joseph ManifoldSandra L. Caul(age 57) has been a director of the Corporation since 2003, and serves on the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, the Compensation and Human Resource Committee, and serves as Chairperson of the Audit Committee. Mr. Manifold is a Certified Public Accountant and CFO of Federal Broach Holdings, a manufacturing company. Previously, he was a senior auditor with Ernst & Young Certified Public Accounting firm working principally on external bank audits and was CFO of the Delfield Corporation. Prior to joining Isabella Bank Corporation Mr. Manifold also served on the Isabella Community Credit Union Board and was Chair of the Mount Pleasant School board.

William J. Strickler(age (age 68) has been a director of the Corporation since 2002, and serves on the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, the Finance and Planning Committee, and the Compensation and Human Resource Committee. He has been a director of Isabella Bank since 1995 and is currently serving as Chairperson. Mr. Strickler is President of Michiwest Energy, an oil and gas producer. Prior to joining the Corporation and the Bank Board he served as a director of the National City Community Bank Board.
Current Directors with Terms Ending in 2010
James C. Fabiano(age 65) has been a director of Isabella Bank since 19791994 and of the Corporation since 1988, of which he is currently serving as Chairperson and is an ex-officio member of all corporate committees. He also serves as an ex-officio member of all subsidiary Boards of Directors of the Corporation and serves as Chairperson of the Compensation and Human Resource Committee. Mr. Fabiano is Chairman and CEO of Fabiano Brothers, Inc., a wholesale beverage distributor operating in several counties throughout Michigan. Mr. Fabiano is a past recipient of the Mount Pleasant Area Chamber of Commerce Citizen of the year award. He is also a past Chairman of Central Michigan University board of trustees.
Dale D. Weburg(age 65) has served on the Board of the Corporation since 2000 and is a member of the Financial Group Information Services Board of Directors. He also serves as the Chairperson for the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, serves on the Audit Committee, and the Compensation and Human Resource Committee. He has been a director of the Breckenridge division of Isabella Bank since 1987, of which he is currently serving as Chairperson. Mr. Weburg is President of Weburg Farms, a cash crop farm operation. Mr. Weburg also serves as a trustee of the Board of Directors of Gratiot Health System.
Theodore W. Kortes(age 68) was appointed director of the Corporation on January 1, 2008, and serves on the Finance and Planning Committee and the Compensation and Human Resource Committee. He is a director and Chairperson of the Greenville division of Isabella Bank. Mr. Kortes was President and CEO of Greenville Community Bank and Greenville Community Financial Corporation since its founding in 1998, until his retirement in 2007.


2


Current Directors with Terms Ending in 2011
Richard J. Barz(age 60) has been a director of the Corporation since 2002. He has been a director of Isabella Bank since 2000. Mr. Barz also serves on the Board of Financial Group Information Services and is a member of the Finance and Planning Committee. Mr. Barz has been President and CEO of Isabella Bank since December 30, 2001. Prior to his appointment as President and CEO he served as Executive Vice President of Isabella Bank.
Sandra L. Caul(age 65) has been a director of the Corporation since 2005. She currently serves as director of Isabella Bank, and serves on the Audit Committee, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, and the Compensation and Human Resource Committee. Ms. Caul is Vice ChairChairperson of the Central Michigan Community Hospital Board of Directors, Chairperson of the Mid Michigan Community College Advisory Board, a board member for Central Michigan Community Mental Health Facilities, a member of the Central Michigan Health Advisory Board for Central Michigan University and is Chairperson for the Central Michigan University College of Medicine regional division fund raising effort. She also sits on the board of the Central Michigan American Red Cross. Ms. Caul retired in January 2005 as a state representative of the Michigan State House of Representatives. Ms. Caul is a registered nurse.

W. Michael McGuire(age 59) (age 62) has been a director of the Corporation since 2007 and serves onof the Audit Committee, Finance and Planning Committee, and the Compensation and Human Resource Committee.Bank since January 1, 2010. He is a director of the Farwell divisionDivision of Isabellathe Bank. Mr. McGuire is currently an attorney and the Director of the Office of the Corporate Secretary and Assistant Secretary of The Dow Chemical Company, a manufacturer of chemicals, plastics and agricultural products.

products, headquartered in Midland, Michigan.

Current Directors with Terms Ending in 2014

Dennis P. Angner (age 56) has been a director of the Corporation and the Bank since 2000. Mr. Angner has been principally employed by the Corporation since 1984 and has served as President of the Corporation since December 30, 2001 and CFO since January 1, 2010. Mr. Angner served as Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation from December 30, 2001 through December 31, 2009. He is the past Chair of the Michigan Bankers Association and is currently serving as vice chairman of its taxation committee, is a member of the American Bankers Association Government Relations Council, and served on the Central Michigan American Red Cross board for over 20 years.

Dr. Jeffrey J. Barnes (age 49) has been a director of the Bank since September 2007 and was appointed to the Corporation’s Board of Directors effective January 1, 2010. Dr. Barnes is a physician and co-owner of Central Eye Consultants. He is a former member of the Central Michigan Community Hospital Board of Directors.

G. Charles Hubscher (age 58) has been a director of the Bank since May 2004 and was appointed to the Corporation’s Board of Directors effective January 1, 2010. Mr. Hubscher is the President of Hubscher and Son, Inc., a sand and gravel producer. He is a director of the National Stone and Gravel Association, the Michigan Aggregates Association, serves on the Board of Trustees for the Mt. Pleasant Area Community Foundation, and is a member of the Zoning Board of Appeals for Deerfield Township.

David J. Maness (age 58) has been a director of the Bank since 2003 and of the Corporation since 2004. Mr. Maness was elected chairman of the board for the Corporation and the Bank in 2010. He is President of Maness Petroleum, a geological and geophysical consulting services company. Mr. Maness is currently serving as a director for the Michigan Oil & Gas Association, and he previously served on the Mt. Pleasant Public Schools Board of Education.

W. Joseph Manifold (age 60) has been a director of the Corporation since 2003 and of the Bank since January 1, 2010. Mr. Manifold is the CFO of Federal Broach Holdings LLC, a holding company which operates several manufacturing companies. Previously, he was a senior manager with Ernst & Young Certified Public Accounting firm working principally on external bank audits and was CFO of the Delfield Company. Prior to joining the Board, Mr. Manifold also served on the Isabella Community Credit Union Board and was Chairman of the Mt. Pleasant Public Schools Board of Education.

Current Directors with Terms Ending in 2013

James C. Fabiano (age 68) has been a director of the Bank since 1979 and of the Corporation since 1988. He served as the Corporation’s chair from 2004 to 2010. Mr. Fabiano is Chairman and CEO of Fabiano Brothers, Inc., a beverage distributor operating in several counties throughout Michigan. Mr. Fabiano is a past recipient of the Mt. Pleasant Area Chamber of Commerce Citizen of the Year award. He is also a past Chairman of the Central Michigan University Board of Trustees.

Thomas L. Kleinhardt (age 57) has been a director of the Bank since October 1998 and was appointed to the Corporation’s Board of Directors effective January 1, 2010. Mr. Kleinhardt is President of McGuire Chevrolet, is active in the Clare Kiwanis Club, and coaches the girls Varsity Basketball team at Farwell High School.

Joseph LaFramboise (age 62) has been a director of the Bank since September 2007, and was appointed to the Corporation’s Board of Directors effective January 1, 2010. He is a retired Sales and Marketing Executive of Ford Motor Company. Mr. LaFramboise is Ambassador of Eagle Village in Evart, Michigan.

Dale D. Weburg (age 68) has served as a director of the Breckenridge Division of the Bank since 1987 and of the Bank and Corporation since 2000. Mr. Weburg is President of Weburg Farms, a cash crop farm operation. Mr. Weburg also serves as a trustee of the Board of Directors of Gratiot Health System.

Each of the directors has been engaged in their stated professions for more than five years. The principal occupation

Other Named Executive Officers

Steven D. Pung (age 62), Executive Vice President of Dennis P. Angner is with the Corporation,Bank and hea member of the Board of Directors of Financial Group Information Services (a wholly owned subsidiary of the Corporation) has been employed by Isabella Bankand/orthe Corporation since 1984. Other executive officers of the Corporation include: Richard J. Barz, President of Isabella Bank, an employee of Isabella Bankand/or the Corporation since 1972;1978. Timothy M. Miller (age 58)60), President of the Breckenridge divisionDivision of Isabellathe Bank and a member of its Board of Directors, has been an employee of Breckenridge divisionand/orthe Corporation since 1985; Peggy L. Wheeler1985. David J. Reetz (age 49)51), Senior Vice President and ControllerChief Lending Officer of the Corporation,Bank, has been employed by Isabella Bankand/or the Corporation since 1977; and Steven D. Pung (age 59), Chief Operations Officer of Isabella Bank, employed by Isabella Bankand/or1987. the Corporation since 1978.

All officers of the Corporation serve at the pleasure of the Corporation’s Board of Directors.

Corporate Governance

Director Independence

The Corporation has adopted the director independence standards as defined inunder Rule 5605(a)(2) of the NASDAQ Marketplace Rule 4200(a)(15).Rules. The Board has determined that Jeffrey J. Barnes, Sandra L. Caul, James C. Fabiano, Dale D. Weburg,G. Charles Hubscher, Thomas L. Kleinhardt, Joseph LaFramboise, David J. Maness, W. Joseph

Manifold, William J. Strickler, Sandra L. Caul, W. Michael McGuire, and Ted W. KortesDale D. Weburg are independent directors. Dennisdirectors. Richard J. Barz is not independent as he is employed as Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation.Dennis P. Angner is not independent as he is employed as President and Chief ExecutiveFinancial Officer of the Corporation. Richard J. Barz is not

Board Leadership Structure and Risk Oversight

The Corporation’s Governance policy provides that only directors who are deemed to be independent as heset forth by NASDAQ and SEC rules are eligible to hold the office of Chairman of the Board. Additionally, the chairpersons of Board established committees must also be independent directors. It is employed as Presidentthe Board’s belief that having a separate Chairman and Chief Executive Officer best serves the interest of the shareholders. The Board of Directors elects its chairperson at the first Board meeting following the annual meeting. Independent members of the Board of Directors meet without insider directors at least twice per year.

Management is responsible for the Corporation’s day to day risk management and the Board’s role is to engage in informed oversight. The Board utilizes committees to oversee risks associated with compensation, financial, and governance. Financial Group Information Services, the Corporation’s information processing subsidiary, is responsible for overseeing risks associated with information technology. The Isabella Bank.

Bank Board of Directors is responsible for overseeing credit, investment, interest rate, and trust risks. The chairpersons of the respective boards or committees report on their activities on a regular basis.

The Audit Committee is responsible for the integrity of the consolidated financial statements of the Corporation; the independent auditors’ qualifications and independence; the performance of the Corporation’s, and its subsidiaries’, internal audit function and independent auditors; the Corporation’s system of internal controls; the Corporation’s financial reporting and system of disclosure controls; and the compliance by the Corporation with legal and regulatory requirements and with the Corporation’s Code of Business Conduct and Ethics.

Committees of the Board of Directors and Meeting Attendance

The Board of Directors of the Corporation met 1412 times during 2008.2011. All incumbent directors attended 75% or more of the meetings held in 2008.2011. The Board of Directors has an Audit Committee, a Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, and a Compensation and Human Resource Committee, and a Finance and Planning Committee.

Audit Committee

The Audit Committee is composed of independent directors who meet the requirements for independence as defined in Rule 5605(a)(2) of the NASDAQ Marketplace Rule 4200(a)(15).Rules. Information regarding the functions performed by the Committee, its membership, and the number of meetings held during the year, is set forth in the “Report of the Audit Committee” included elsewhere in this annual proxy statement. The Audit Committee is governed by a written charter approved by the Board of Directors and was included as Appendix A toBoard. The Audit Committee Charter is available on the Corporation’s proxy statement forBank’s websitewww.isabellabank.com under the 2008 Annual Shareholder’s Meeting.


3

Investor Relations tab.


In accordance with the provisions of the Sarbanes — Oxley Act of 2002, Directordirectors Manifold meetsand McGuire meet the requirements of Audit Committee Financial Expert and hashave been so designated by the Board of Directors.Board. The committeeCommittee also consists of directors Caul, Fabiano, Maness, McGuireBarnes, Hubscher, LaFramboise, and Weburg.
Maness.

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

The Corporation has a standing Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee consisting of independent directors who meet the requirements for independence as defined in Rule 5605(a)(2) of NASDAQ Marketplace Rule 4200(a) (15).Rules. The Committee consists of directors Caul, Fabiano,LaFramboise, Maness, Manifold, Strickler and Weburg.McGuire. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee met as a full board and held two meetings in 2008, and2011, with all directors attended 75% or more of the meetings in 2008.meetings. The Board of Directors has approved a Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Charter and it was included as Appendix B towhich is available on the Corporation’s proxy statement forBank’s websitewww.isabellabank.com under the 2008 Annual Shareholder’s Meeting. Investor Relations tab.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for evaluating and recommending individuals for nomination to the Board of Directors for approval. In making its selectionsThe Committee in evaluating nominees, including incumbent directors and recommendations,any nominees put forth by shareholders, considers business experience, skills, character, judgment, leadership experience, and their knowledge of the Nominatinggeographical markets, business segments or other criteria the Committee deems relevant and Corporate Governanceappropriate based on the current composition of the Board. The Committee considers a varietydiversity in identifying members with respect to geographical markets served by the Corporation and the business experience of factors, which generally include the candidate’s personal and professional integrity, independence, business judgment, and communication skills.

nominee.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider, as potential nominees persons recommended by shareholders. Recommendations should be submitted in writing to the Secretary of the Corporation, 401 N. Main St., MountMt. Pleasant, Michigan 48858 and include the shareholder’s name, address and number of shares of the Corporation owned by the shareholder. The recommendation should also include the name, age, address and qualifications of the recommended candidate for nomination. Recommendations for the 20102013 Annual Meeting of Shareholders should be delivered no later than December 11, 2009.6, 2012. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee does not evaluate potential nominees for director differently based on whether they are recommended to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, by a shareholder or otherwise.

Compensation and Human Resource Committee

The Compensation and Human Resource Committee of the Corporation is responsible for reviewing and recommending to the Corporation’s Board of Directors the compensation of the PresidentChief Executive Officer and other executive officers of the Corporation, benefit plans and the overall percentage increase in salaries. The committee consists of all independent directors, who meet the requirements for independence as defined in Rule 5605(a) (2) of the NASDAQ Marketplace Rules. The Committee consists of directors Maness, Barnes, Caul, Fabiano, Caul, Kortes,Hubscher, Kleinhardt, LaFramboise, Manifold, McGuire, Maness, Manifold, Strickler, and Weburg. The Committee held one meetingtwo meetings during 20082011 with all directors attendingin attendance with the meeting.exception of Fabiano who was excused from one of the meetings. This committeeCommittee is governed by a written charter approved by the Board of Directors that was attached as Appendix A tois available on the Corporation’s proxy statement forBank’s websitewww.isabellabank.com under the 2007 Annual Shareholder’s Meeting.

Investor Relations tab.

Finance and Planning Committee

The Finance and Planning Committee evaluates new business opportunities and business acquisitions, assists management in establishing financial goals, reviews all strategic plans of subsidiaries to assure consistency with overall corporate goals, and reviews interest rate risks, credit risks and insurance coverage. The committee consists of directors Maness, Angner, Barz, Fabiano, Kortes, McGuire, and Strickler.
Communications with the Board

Shareholders may communicate with the Corporation’s Board of Directors by sending written communications to the attention of the Corporation’s Secretary, Isabella Bank Corporation, 401 N. Main St., MountMt. Pleasant, Michigan 48858. Communications will be forwarded to the Board of Directors or the appropriate committee, as soon as practicable.

Code of Ethics

The Corporation has adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that is applicable to the Corporation’s principal executive officerChief Executive Officer and the principal financial officer and controller.Chief Financial Officer. The Corporation’s Code of Business Conduct and Ethics may be obtained free of charge by sending a request to Debra Campbell, Secretary, Isabella Bank Corporation, 401 N. Main St., Mount Pleasant, Michigan 48858.


4is available on the Bank’s websitewww.isabellabank.com under the Investor Relations tab.


Report of the Audit Committee

The Audit Committee oversees the Corporation’s financial reporting process on behalf of the Board of Directors.Board. The 2011 Committee consistsconsisted of directors Fabiano, Caul,Barnes, Hubscher, LaFramboise, Maness, Manifold McGuire, and Weburg.

McGuire.

The Audit Committee is responsible for pre-approving all auditing services and permitted non-audit services over $5,000 for the Corporation by its independent auditors or any other auditing or accounting firm if those fees are reasonably expected to exceed 5.0% of the current year agreed upon fee for independent audit services, except as noted below. The Audit Committee has established general guidelines for the permissible scope and nature of any permitted non-audit services in connection with its annual review of the audit plan and reviews the guidelines with the Board of Directors.

Management has the primary responsibility for the consolidated financial statements and the reporting process including the systems of internal controls. In fulfilling its oversight responsibilities, the Audit Committee reviewed the audited consolidated financial statements in the Annual Report with management including a discussion of the quality, not just the acceptability, of the accounting principles, the reasonableness of significant judgments, and the clarity of disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. The Audit Committee also reviewed with management and the independent auditors, management’s assertion on the design and effectiveness of the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008.

2011.

The Audit Committee reviewed with the Corporation’s independent auditors, who are responsible for expressing an opinion on the conformity of those audited consolidated financial statements with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, their judgments as to the quality, not just the acceptability, of the Corporation’s accounting principles and such other matters as are required to be discussed with the Audit Committee by the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), including those described in AU Section 380 “Communication with Audit Committees”, as may be modified or supplemented. In addition, the Audit Committee has received the written disclosures and the letter from the independent accountants required by PCAOB Rule 3526, Communication with Audit Committees Concerning Independence, as may be modified or supplemented, and has discussed with the independent accountant the independent accountants’ independence.

The Audit Committee discussed with the Corporation’s internal and independent auditors the overall scope and plans for their respective audits. The Audit Committee meets with the internal and external independent auditors, with and without management present, to discuss the results of their examinations, their evaluations of the Corporation’s internal controls and the overall quality of the Corporation’s financial reporting process. The Audit Committee held foursix meetings during 2008,2011, and all directorscommittee members attended 75% or more of the meetings held in 2008.

meetings.

In reliance on the reviews and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors (and the Board has approved) that the audited consolidated financial statements be included in the Annual Report onForm 10-K for the year ended December 31, 20082011 for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Audit Committee has appointed Rehmann Robson, P.C. as the independent auditors for the 20092012 audit.

Respectfully submitted,

W. Joseph Manifold, Audit Committee Chairperson

James C. Fabiano

Jeffrey J. Barnes

G. Charles Hubscher

Joseph LaFramboise

David J. Maness

Sandra L. Caul

W. Michael McGuire

Dale D. Weburg


5


Compensation Discussion and Analysis

The Compensation and Human Resource Committee (the “Committee”) is responsible for reviewing and recommending the compensation and benefits for the Chief Executive Officer, President, and executive officers of the Corporation. The Committee evaluates and approves the executive officer and senior management compensation plans, policies and programs of the Corporation and its affiliates. The Committee also evaluates and establishes the compensation of the President and Chief Executive Officer, of the Corporation. The President and Chief Executive Officer, Dennis P. Angner,Richard J. Barz, conducts annual performance reviews for all Named Executive Officers, excluding himself. Mr. AngnerBarz recommends an appropriate salary increase to the Committee based on the performance review and the officer’s years of service along with competitive market data.

Compensation Objectives

The Committee considers asset growth with the safety and soundness objectives and earnings per share to be the primary ratios in measuring financial performance. The Corporation’s philosophy is to maximize long-term return to shareholders consistent with safe and sound banking practices, while maintaining the commitment to superior customer and community service. The Corporation believes that the performance of our executive officers in managing ourthe business should be the basis for determining overall compensation. Consideration is also given to overall economic conditions and current competitive forces in the market place. The objectives of the Committee are to effectively balance salaries and potential compensation to an officer’s individual management responsibilities and encourage them to realize their potential for future contributions to the Corporation. The objectives are designed to attract and retain high performing executive officers who will lead the Corporation while attaining the Corporation’s earnings and performance goals.

What the Compensation Programs are Designed to Reward

The Corporation’s compensation programs are designed to reward dedicated and conscientious employment with the Corporation, loyalty in terms of continued employment, attainment of job related goals and overall profitability of the Corporation. In measuring an executive officer’s contributions to the Corporation, the Committee considers numerous factors including, among other things, the Corporation’s growth in terms of asset size and increase in earnings per share. In rewarding loyalty and long-term service, the Corporation provides attractive retirement benefits.

Review of Risks Associated with Compensation Plans

Based on an analysis conducted by management and reviewed by the Committee, management does not believe that the Corporation’s compensation programs for employees are reasonably likely to have a material short or long term adverse effect on the Corporation’s Results of Operation.

Use of Consultants

In 2010, the Committee directly engaged the services of Blanchard Chase (now Blanchard Consulting Group), an outside compensation consulting firm, to assist with a total compensation review for the top two executive officers of the Corporation (CEO and President). Blanchard Consulting Group is an independent consulting firm and does not perform any additional services for the Corporation or senior management. In addition, Blanchard Consulting Group does not have any other personal or business relationships with any Board member or any officer of the Corporation. During 2011, the Committee did not employ any services of outside compensation or benefit consultants to assist it in compensation-related initiatives.

Elements of Compensation

The Corporation’s executive compensation program has consisted primarily of base salary and benefits, annual cash bonus incentives, stock awards,director fees for insider directors, and participation in the Corporation’s retirement plans.

Why Each of the Elements of Compensation is Chosen

Base Salary and Benefitsare set to provide competitive levels of compensation to attract and retain officers with strong motivated leadership. Each officer’s performance, current compensation, and responsibilities within the Corporation are considered by the Committee when establishing base salaries. The Corporation also believes

it is best to pay sufficient base salary because it believes an over-reliance on equity incentive compensation could potentially skew incentives toward short-term maximization of shareholder value as opposed to building long-term shareholder value. Base salary encourages management to operate the Corporation in a safe and sound manner even when incentive goals may prove unattainable.

Annual Performance Incentivesare used to reward executive officers for the Corporation’s overall financial performance. This element of the Corporation’s compensation programs is included in the overall compensation in order to reward employees above and beyond their base salaries when the Corporation’s performance and profitability exceed established annual targets. The inclusion of a modest incentive compensation encourages management to be more creative, diligent and exhaustive in managing the Corporation to achieve specifiedspecific financial goals.

Stock Awardsare also provided as stock awards aregoals without incurring inordinate risks.

Performance incentives paid under the element of compensationExecutive Incentive Plan in 2011 were determined by reference to seven performance measures that is most effectiverelated to services performed in aligning2010. The maximum award that may be granted under the financial interests of management with those of shareholders and because stock awards are a traditional


6


and well-proven element of compensation among community banks and bank holding companies. These stock awards are granted pursuantExecutive Incentive Plan to the Isabella Bank Corporation and Related Companies Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors (“Directors’ Plan”), under whicheach eligible executive officers elect to defer their director fees, which deferred fees are then converted, on a quarterly basis, into sharesemployee equals 10% of the Corporation’s common stock.employee’s base salary (the “Maximum Award”). The Corporation has established a Trust to fund the Directors’ Plan. The directorspayment of 35% of the CorporationMaximum Award was conditioned on the eligible employee accomplishing personal performance goals that were established by such employee’s supervisor as part of the employee’s annual performance review. Each of the employees who were eligible to participate in the Executive Incentive Plan in 2010 accomplished his or her personal performance goals and its subsidiaries are requiredwas accordingly paid 35% of the 2010 Maximum Award in 2011. The payment of the remaining 65% of the Maximum Award was conditioned on the achievement of Corporation-wide targets in the following six categories: (1) earnings per share (weighted 40%); (2) net operating expenses to defer at least 25%average assets (weighted 10%); (3) Fully Taxable Equivalent “FTE” net interest margin, excluding loan fees (weighted 10%); (4) in-market deposit growth (weighted 20%); (5) loan growth (weighted 10%); and (6) exceeding peer group return on average assets (weighted 10%). The following chart provides the 2010 target for each of their earned board fees into the Directors’ Plan.
foregoing targets that were used to determine bonus awards that were paid in 2011, as well as the performance obtained for each target.

Executive Incentive Plan

    2010 Targets  2010
Performance
 

Target

  25.00%  50.00%  75.00%  100.00%  

Earning per share

  $  1.15   $  1.16   $  1.18   $  1.20    $1.31  

Net operating expenses to average assets

   1.71  1.70  1.69  1.68  1.65

FTE Net Interest Margin

   3.88  3.90  3.92  3.94  3.83

In market deposit growth

   4.50  5.00  5.50  6.00  12.19

Loan growth

   5.50  6.00  6.50  7.00  3.03

Exceeding peer group return on average assets

   0.26  0.26  0.27  0.28  0.77

Retirement Plans.Plans.    The Corporation’s retirement plans are designed to assist executives in providing themselves with a financially secure retirement. OurThe retirement plans include: a frozen defined benefit pension plan,plan; a 401(k) plan,plan; and a non-leveraged employee stock ownership plan (ESOP), which is frozen to new participants,participants; and a retirement bonus plan.

How the Corporation ChoseDetermined Amounts for Each Element

The Committee’s approach to determining the annual base salary of executive officers is to offer competitive salaries in comparison with other comparable financial institutions. The Committee utilizedutilizes both an independent compensation consultant, to performBlanchard Consulting Group, and a compensation survey prepared by the Michigan Bankers Association of similar sized Michigan based financial institutions. The independent compensation consultant established a benchmark peer group of 20 mid-west financial institutions for 2007in non urban areas whose average assets size, number of branch locations, return on average assets and nonperforming assets were comparable to Isabella Bank Corporation. The Michigan Bankers Association 2011 compensation survey was based on the compensation information provided by the Michigan Bankers Associationthese organizations for banks in the State of Michigan with assets over $500 million to provide salary ranges for its executive officers.2010. Specific factors used to decide

where an executive officer’s salary should be within the established range include the historical financial performance, financial performance outlook, years of service, and job performance.

The Committee targets total compensation for the Chief Executive Officer and the President & Chief Financial Officer to approximate the median of the range obtained from the Michigan Bankers Association compensation survey as well as any ranges obtained from independent compensation consultants. Compensation for other named executive officers was based on the ranges provided by the Michigan Bankers Association survey.

The annual performance incentive is based on the achievement of goals set on individual performance and recognition of individual performance. A subjectivefor each individual. An analysis is conducted by the Chief Executive Officer. The Chief Executive Officer makes a recommendation to the Committee for the appropriate amount for each individual executive officer. The Committee reviews, modifies if necessary, and approves the recommendations of the Chief Executive Officer. The Committee reviews the performance of the Chief Executive Officer. The Committee uses the following factors as quantitative measures of corporate performance in determining annual cash bonus amounts to be paid.paid:

Peer group financial performance compensation

1 and 5 year shareholder returns

• peer group financial performance compensation;
• 1 and 5 year shareholder returns;
• earnings per share and earnings per share growth;
• budgeted as compared to actual annual operating performance;
• community and industry involvement;
• results of audit and regulatory exams; and
• other strategic goals as established by the board of directors

Earnings per share and earnings per share growth

Budgeted as compared to actual annual operating performance

Community and industry involvement

Results of audit and regulatory exams

Other strategic goals as established by the board of directors

While no particular weight is given to any specific factor, the Committee gives at least equal weight to the subjective analyses as described above.

Stock awards

Retirement plans.    The Corporation has a 401(k) plan in which substantially all employees are grantedeligible to participate. Employees may contribute up to 50% of their compensation subject to certain limits based on federal tax laws. As a result of the curtailment of the defined benefit plan noted below, the Corporation increased the contributions to the 401(k) plan effective January 1, 2007. The Corporation makes an annual 3.0% safe harbor contribution for all eligible employees and matching contributions equal to 50% of the first 4.0% of an employee’s compensation contributed to the Plan during the year. Employees are 100% vested in the safe harbor contributions and are 0% vested through their first two years of employment and are 100% vested after 6 years through a laddered vesting schedule of service for matching contributions.

The Corporation maintains a non-leveraged employee stock ownership plan (ESOP) which was frozen effective December 31, 2006 to new participants. Contributions to the plan are discretionary and approved by the Board of Directors.

The retirement bonus plan is a nonqualified plan of deferred compensation benefits for eligible employees effective January 1, 2007. An initial amount was credited for each eligible employee as of January 1, 2007. Subsequent amounts have been credited on each allocation date thereafter as defined in the plan. The amount of the initial allocation and the annual allocation are determined pursuant to the Director’s Plan, under which participants elect to defer their director fees, which director fees are then converted, on a quarterly basis, into sharespayment schedule adopted at the sole and exclusive discretion of the Corporation’s common stock based onBoard of Directors, as set forth in the fair market value of a share of the Corporation’s common stock at that time. Shares of stock credited to a participant’s account under the Directors’ Plan are eligible for stock and cash dividends as payable.

Total compensation in 2008 was based on the committee targeting its executive officer’s compensation to approximate the median of the ranges provided by independent consultants and Michigan Bankers Association surveys.
Retirement plans.plan.

In December 2006, the Board of Directors voted to curtail the defined benefit plan effective March 1, 2007. The effect of the curtailment was recognized in the first quarter of 2007 and the current participants’ accrued benefits were frozen as of March 1, 2007. Participation in the plan was limited to eligible employees as of December 31, 2006.

Other Benefits and Perquisites.Executive officers are eligible for all of the benefits made available to full-time employees of the Corporation (such as the 401(k) plan, employee stock purchase plan, health insurance, group term life insurance and disability insurance) on the same basis as other full-time employees and are subject to the same sick leave and other employee policies. The Corporation has a 401(k) planalso provides its executive officers with

certain additional benefits and perquisites, which it believes are appropriate in which substantially all employeesorder to attract and retain the proper quality of talent for these positions and to recognize that similar executive benefits and perquisites are eligiblecommonly offered by comparable financial institutions.

A description and the cost to participate. Employees may contribute up to 100% of their compensation subject to certain limits based on federal tax laws. As a result of the curtailment of the defined benefit plan noted above, the Corporation increasedof these perquisites are included in footnote two in the contributions to the 401(k)


7

“Summary Compensation Table” appearing on page 15.


plan effective January 1, 2007. The enhancement includes a discretionary 3.0% contribution for all eligible employees and matching contributions equal to 50% of the first 4.0% of an employee’s compensation contributed to the Plan during the year.
The Corporation maintainsbelieves that benefits and perquisites provided to its executive officers in 2011 represented a non-leveraged employee stock ownership plan (ESOP) which covers substantially allreasonable percentage of its employees. The planeach executive’s total compensation package and was frozen effective December 31, 2006not inconsistent, in the aggregate, with perquisites provided to new participants. Contributions’ to the plan are discretionary and approved by the Boardexecutive officers of Directors.
comparable competing financial institutions.

The Corporation maintains a plan for qualified officers to provide death benefits to each participant. Insurance policies, designed primarily to fund death benefits, have been purchased on the life of each participant with the Corporation as the sole owner and beneficiary of the policies.

The retirement bonus plan is a nonqualified plan of deferred compensation benefits for eligible employees effective January 1, 2007. An initial amount has been credited for each eligible employee as of January 1, 2007. Subsequent amounts will be credited on each allocation date thereafter as defined in the plan. The amount of the initial allocation and the annual allocation will be determined pursuant the payment schedule adopted at the sole and exclusive discretion of the Board of Directors, as set forth in the plan.

How Elements Fit into Overall Compensation Objectives

The elements of the Corporation’s compensation are structured to reward past and current performance, continued service and to motivate its leaders to excel in the future. The Corporation’s salary compensation has generally been used to retain and attract motivated leadership. The Corporation intends to continually ensure salaries are sufficient to attract and retain exceptional officers. The Corporation’s cash bonus incentive rewards current performance based upon personal and corporate goals and targets. The Corporation makes stock awardsoffers the Isabella Bank Corporation and Related Companies Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors (the “Directors’ Plan”) to motivate its eligible officers to enhance value for shareholders by aligning the interests of management with those of its shareholders.

As part of its goal of attracting and retaining quality team members, the Corporation has developed competitive employee benefit plans that make it stand out from the rest of the competition.plans. Management feels that the combination of all of the plans listed above makes the Corporation’s total compensation packages attractive.

Compensation and BenefitsHuman Resource Committee Report

The following Report of the Compensation and Human Resource Committee does not constitute soliciting material and should not be deemed filed or incorporated by reference into any other Corporation filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent the Corporation specifically incorporates this Report by reference therein.

The Compensation and Human Resource Committee, which includes all of the independent directors of the board,Board, has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis required by Item 402(b) of SECRegulation S-K with management, and based on such review and discussion, the Compensation and Human Resource Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement and the Annual Report onForm 10-K.

Submitted by the Compensation and Human Resource Committee of Isabella Bank Corporation’s Board of Directors:

David J. Maness, Chairperson

Jeffrey J. Barnes

Sandra L. Caul

James C. Fabiano Chairperson

Sandra

G. Charles Hubscher

Thomas L. Caul

Ted W. Kortes
David J. Maness
Kleinhardt

Joseph LaFramboise

W. Joseph Manifold

W. Michael McGuire

William J. Strickler

Dale D. Weburg


8


Executive Officers

Executive Officers of the Corporation are compensated in accordance with their employment with the applicable entity. The following table shows information on compensation earned from the Corporation or its subsidiaries for each of the last three fiscal years ended December 31, 2008, by2011, for the President and Chief Executive Officer, the PrincipalChief Financial Officer, and the corporation’sCorporation’s three other most highly compensated executive officers.

Summary Compensation Table

                             
              Change in Pension
       
              Value and
       
              Non-Qualified
       
              Deferred
       
              Compensation
  All Other
    
     Salary
  Bonus
  Stock Awards
  Earnings
  Compensation
  Total
 
Name and principal position
 Year  ($)(1)  ($)(1)  ($)  ($)(2)  ($)(3)  ($) 
 
Dennis P. Angner  2008  $294,670  $9,450  $41,425  $28,089  $18,453  $392,087 
President and CEO  2007   288,101   8,225   26,280   (7,000)  18,715   334,321 
of Isabella Bank Corporation  2006   255,237   10,000   16,228   70,646   8,233   360,344 
Peggy L. Wheeler  2008   105,000   3,500      13,000   2,216   123,716 
Principal Financial Officer,  2007   100,000   3,000      (3,000)  2,023   102,023 
Sr. Vice President
and Controller of
Isabella Bank Corporation
  2006   88,500         14,339   685   103,524 
Richard J. Barz  2008   300,785   9,100   32,490   72,622   22,697   437,694 
Executive Vice President of  2007   274,706   7,875   18,125      23,226   323,932 
Isabella Bank Corporation President and CEO
Isabella Bank
  2006   237,175   14,400   15,100   134,235   10,948   411,858 
Timothy M. Miller  2008   160,145   3,200   6,715   3,411   14,127   187,598 
Vice President of  2007   155,171      7,880   (1,000)  14,167   176,218 
Isabella Bank Corporation President of the Breckenridge division of Isabella Bank  2006   149,117   3,567   7,223   17,030   5,778   182,715 
Steven D. Pung(4)   2008   117,100   3,785   1,125   45,884   13,169   181,063 
Sr. Vice President and COO Isabella Bank  2007   108,100   3,625   1,800      14,194   127,719 

Name and principal position

  Year   Salary
($)(1)
   Bonus ($)   Change in pension
value and
non-qualified
deferred
compensation
earnings

($)(2)
   All other
compensation
($)(3)
   Total
($)
 

Richard J. Barz

   2011    $375,225    $26,535    $181,143    $37,627    $620,530  

CEO Isabella Bank Corporation

   2010     357,600     24,706     116,364     34,856     533,526  

President and CEO Isabella Bank

   2009     354,250     9,625     90,184     30,568     484,627  

Dennis P. Angner

   2011    $355,625    $26,100    $163,672    $28,542    $573,939  

President and CFO

   2010     352,600     24,706     103,340     27,922     508,568  

Isabella Bank Corporation

   2009     359,425     9,800     79,623     25,252     474,100  

Steven D. Pung

   2011    $167,362    $12,719    $98,915    $27,732    $306,728  

Executive Vice President

   2010     143,632     10,572     62,288     32,886     249,378  

Isabella Bank

   2009     127,100     6,003     48,518     18,468     200,089  

Timothy M. Miller

   2011    $181,986    $13,046    $17,000    $15,070    $227,102  

President of the Breckenridge

   2010     179,309     12,370     9,000     14,709     215,388  

Division of Isabella Bank

   2009     180,238     7,319     6,000     11,685     205,242  

David J. Reetz(4)

   2011    $125,640    $8,612    $61,944    $15,077    $211,273  

Sr. Vice President and CLO

   2010     123,910     9,165     36,429     13,694     183,198  

Isabella Bank

            

(1)Includes compensation voluntarily deferred under the Corporation’s 401(k) plan. Directors fees paid in cash are also included, for calendar years 2008, 20072011, 2010 and 20062009 respectively as follows: Richard J. Barz $50,225, $52,600, and $59,250; Dennis P. Angner $14,670, $23,870$49,625, $52,600, and $20,237; Richard J. Barz $25,785, $20,475$59,425; Steven D. Pung $900, $900, and $12,175;$900; and Timothy M. Miller $17,445, $20,940$10,650, $11,300, and $18,117.$26,900.

(2)For 2006, approximately 75% ofRepresents the aggregate non-cash change in the actuarial present value of the definednoted executive’s accumulated benefit is related to prior service, a decrease inunder the assumed discount rate,Isabella Bank Corporation Pension Plan for calendar years 2011, 2010, and a2009 as follows: Richard J. Barz $143,000, $81,000, and $56,000; Dennis P. Angner $109,000, $53,000, and $32,000; Steven D. Pung $77,000, $42,000, $29,000; Timothy M. Miller $17,000, $9,000, and $6,000; David J. Reetz $43,000 and $19,000; this also includes the non-cash change in the actuarial mortality table. Amounts were determined using assumptions consistent with those used in the Corporation’s consolidated financial statements. The Board of Directors approved a curtailment of this plan in December 2006 effective March 1, 2007. Assumptions were consistent with those that were presented in the consolidated financial statements.Isabella Bank Corporation Retirement Bonus Plan for calendar years 2011, 2010, and 2009 as follows: Richard J. Barz $38,143, $35,364, $34,184; Dennis P. Angner $54,672, $50,340, and $47,623; Steven D. Pung $21,915, $20,288, and $19,518; and David J. Reetz $18,944 and $17,429.

(3)For all noted executives all other compensation includes 401(k) matching contributions. For Richard J. Barz, and Steven D. Pung, and David J. Reetz this also includes club dues and auto allowance. For Dennis P. Angner and Timothy M. Miller, this also includes auto allowance.

(4)Not a named executive officer prior to 2007.2010.


9


20082011 Pension Benefits

The following table indicates the present value of accumulated benefits as of December 31, 20082011 for each named executive in the summary compensation table.

               
    Number of
       
    Years of
  Present
    
    Credited
  Value of
    
    Service as
  Accumulated
  Payments
 
    of 01/01/09
  Benefit
  During Last
 
Name
 Plan Name (#)  ($)  Fiscal Year 
 
Dennis P. Angner Isabella Bank Corporation Pension Plan  23  $297,000  $ 
  Isabella Bank Corporation Retirement Bonus Plan  23   177,570    
Peggy L. Wheeler Isabella Bank Corporation Pension Plan  28   79,000    
  Isabella Bank Corporation Retirement Bonus Plan  28   46,134    
Richard J. Barz Isabella Bank Corporation Pension Plan  35   625,000    
  Isabella Bank Corporation Retirement Bonus Plan  35   201,383    
Timothy M. Miller Isabella Bank Corporation Pension Plan  6   64,000    
Steven D. Pung Isabella Bank Corporation Pension Plan  28   313,000    
  Isabella Bank Corporation Retirement Bonus Plan  28   105,824    

Name

  

Plan name

  Number of
years of
vesting
service as of
01/01/12 (#)
  Present
value of
accumulated
benefit

($)
   Payments
during last
fiscal year
 

Richard J. Barz

  Isabella Bank Corporation Pension Plan  40  $905,000    $  
  Isabella Bank Corporation Retirement Bonus Plan  40   309,074       

Dennis P. Angner

  Isabella Bank Corporation Pension Plan  28   491,000       
  Isabella Bank Corporation Retirement Bonus Plan  28   330,205       

Steven D. Pung

  Isabella Bank Corporation Pension Plan  33   461,000       
  Isabella Bank Corporation Retirement Bonus Plan  33   167,545       

Timothy M.
Miller

  Isabella Bank Corporation Pension Plan  11   96,000       

David J. Reetz

  Isabella Bank Corporation Pension Plan  25   162,000       
  Isabella Bank Corporation Retirement Bonus Plan  25   109,322       

Defined benefit pension plan.plan.    The Corporation sponsors the Isabella Bank Corporation Pension Plan, a frozen defined benefit pension plan. In December 2006, the Board of Directors voted to curtail the defined benefit plan effective March 1, 2007. The effect of the curtailment which was recognized in the first quarter of 2007, froze the current participant’s accrued benefits as of March 1, 2007 and limited participation in the plan to eligible employees as of December 31, 2006. Due to the curtailment of the plan, the number of years of credited service was frozen. As such, the years of credited service for the plan may differ from the participant’s actual years of service with the Corporation.

Annual contributions are made to the plan as required by accepted actuarial principles, applicable federal tax law,laws, and expenses of operating and maintaining the plan. The amount of contributions on behalf of any one participant cannot be separately or individually computed.

Pension plan benefits are based on years of service and the employees’ five highest consecutive years of compensation out of the last ten years of service, effective through December 31, 2006.

A participant may earn a benefit for up to 35 years of accredited service. Earned benefits are 100 percent vested after five years of service. Benefit payments normally start when a participant reaches age 65. A participant with more than five years of service may elect to take early retirement benefits anytime after reaching age 55. Benefits payable under early retirement are reduced actuarially for each month prior to age 65 in which benefits begin.

Dennis P. Angner, Richard J. Barz, Steven D. Pung, and Timothy M. Miller and Steven D. Pung are eligible for early retirement under the Isabella Bank Corporation Pension Plan. Under the provisions of the Plan, participants are eligible for early retirement after reaching the age of 55 with at least 5 years of service. The early retirement benefit amount is the accrued benefit payable at normal retirement date reduced by5/9% 5/9% for each of the first 60 months and5/18% 5/18% for each of the next 60 months that the benefit commencement date precedes the normal retirement date.

Retirement bonus plan.plan.    The Corporation sponsors the Isabella Bank Corporation Retirement Bonus Plan. The retirement bonus planRetirement Bonus Plan is a nonqualified plan of deferred compensation benefits for eligible employees effective January 1, 2007. This plan is intended to provide eligible employees with additional retirement benefits. To be eligible, the employee needed to be employed by the Corporation on January 1, 2007, and be a participant in the Corporation’s frozen Executive Supplemental Income Agreement. Participants must also be an officer of the Corporation with at least 10 years of service as of December 31, 2006. The Corporation has sole and exclusive discretion to add new participants to the plan by authorizing such participation pursuant to action of the Corporation’s Board of Directors.

An initial amount has beenwas credited for each eligible employee as of January 1, 2007. Subsequent amounts shall behave been credited on each allocation date thereafter as defined in the plan.Plan. The amount of the initial allocation and the


10


annual allocation shall be determined pursuant to the payment schedule adopted by the sole and exclusive discretion of the Board, of Directors, as set forth in the plan.
Plan.

Richard J. Barz, Timothy M. Miller,Dennis P. Angner, and Steven D. Pung are eligible for early retirement under the Isabella Bank Corporation Retirement Bonus Plan. Under the provisions of the Plan,plan, participants are eligible for early retirement upon attaining 55 years of age. There is no difference between the calculation of benefits payable upon early retirement and normal retirement.

20082011 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation

             
  Executive
  Aggregate
  Aggregate
 
  Contributions in
  Earnings in
  Balance at
 
  Last FY
  Last FY
  Last FYE
 
Name
 ($)  ($)  ($) 
 
Dennis P. Angner $41,425  $1,269  $85,930 
Peggy L. Wheeler         
Richard J. Barz  32,490   987   67,306 
Timothy M. Miller  6,715   352   22,465 
Steven D. Pung  1,125   98   6,042 

Name

  Executive
contributions in
last FY

($)
   Aggregate
earnings in
last FY ($)
   Aggregate
balance at
last FYE
($)
 

Richard J. Barz

  $29,462    $5,133    $176,837  

Dennis P. Angner

   33,462     6,898     235,199  

Steven D. Pung

   900     238     7,998  

Timothy M. Miller

   3,337     1,080     36,297  

David J. Reetz

   N/A     N/A     N/A  

The directors of the Corporation and its subsidiaries are required to defer at least 25% of their earned board fees into the Directors’ Plan and may defer up to 100% of their earned fees based on their annual election. These amounts are reflected in the 20082011 nonqualified deferred compensation table above. Under the Directors’ Plan, these deferred fees are converted on a quarterly basis into shares of the Corporation’s common stock based on the fair market value of shares of the Corporation’s common stock at that time. Shares credited to a participant’s account are eligible for stock and cash dividends as payable.

Distribution from the Directors’ Plan occurs when the participant retires from the board,Board, attains age 70 or upon the occurrence of certain other events. Distributions must take the form of shares of the Corporation’s common stock. Any Corporation common stock issued under the Directors’ Plan will be considered restricted stock under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control

The estimated pay outspayments payable to each named executive officer upon severance from employment, retirement, termination upon death or disability or termination following a change in control of the Corporation are described below. For all termination scenarios, the amounts assume such termination took place as of December 31, 2008.

2011.

Any Severance of Employment

Regardless of the manner in which a named executive officer’s employment terminates, he or she is entitled to receive amounts earned during his or her term of employment. Such amounts include:

Amounts accrued and vested through the Defined Benefit Pension Plan.

Amounts accrued and vested through the Retirement Bonus Plan.

• Amounts accrued and vested through the Defined Benefit Pension Plan.
• Amounts accrued and vested through the Retirement Bonus Plan.
• Amounts deferred in the Directors’ Plan.
• Unused vacation pay.

Amounts deferred in the Directors’ Plan.

Unused vacation pay.

Retirement

In the event of the retirement of an executive officer, the officer would receive the benefits identified above. As of December 31, 2008,2011, the named executive officers listed had no unused vacation days.


11


Death or Disability

In the event of death or disability of an executive officer, in addition to the benefits listed above, the executive officer will also receive payments under the Corporation’s life insurance plan or benefits under the Corporation’s disability plan as appropriate.

In addition to potential payments upon termination available to all employees, the estates for the executive officers listed below would receive the following payments upon death:

             
  While an
       
  Active
  Subsequent to
    
Name
 Employee  Retirement    
 
Dennis P. Angner $560,000  $140,000     
Peggy L. Wheeler  210,000   105,000     
Richard J. Barz  550,000   275,000     
Timothy M. Miller  285,400   142,700     
Steven D. Pung  234,200   117,100     

Name

  While an
Active
Employee
   Subsequent to
Retirement
 

Richard J. Barz

  $650,000    $325,000  

Dennis P. Angner

   612,000     306,000  

Steven D. Pung

   333,000     166,500  

Timothy M. Miller

   305,600     152,800  

David J. Reetz

   251,200     125,600  

Change in Control

The Corporation currently does not have a change in control agreement with any of the executive officers; provided, however, pursuant to the Retirement Bonus Plan each participant would become 100% vested in their benefit under the plan if, following a change in control, they voluntarily terminate employment or are terminated without just cause.

Director Compensation

The following table summarizes the Compensation of each non-employee director who served on the Board of Directors during 2008.

                 
        Change in
    
        Pension Value
    
        and Non-
    
  Fees
     Qualified
    
  Earned or
     Deferred
    
  Paid in
  Stock
  Compensation
    
  Cash
  Awards
  Earnings
  Total
 
Name
 ($)  ($)  ($)  ($) 
 
Sandra Caul $  $37,450  $(174,451) $(137,001)
James Fabiano     47,750   (482,948)  (435,198)
Ted Kortes  18,737   12,038   (3,429)  27,346 
David Maness     40,325   (79,544)  (39,219)
W. Joseph Manifold     25,350   (55,389)  (30,039)
W. Michael McGuire     30,275   (34,439)  (4,164)
William Strickler     51,499   (215,151)  (163,652)
Dale Weburg     32,435   (111,175)  (78,740)
2011.

   

Fees

earned or

paid in
cash

   Total 

Name

  ($)   ($) 

Jeffrey J. Barnes

   27,675     27,675  

Sandra L. Caul

   32,675     32,675  

James C. Fabiano

   32,550     32,550  

G. Charles Hubscher

   32,375     32,375  

Thomas L. Kleinhardt

   36,675     36,675  

Joseph LaFramboise

   32,775     32,775  

David J. Maness

   58,321     58,321  

W. Joseph Manifold

   30,871     30,871  

W. Michael McGuire

   35,050     35,050  

Dianne C. Morey

   7,350     7,350  

Dale D. Weburg

   36,425     36,425  

The Corporation paid a $6,000 retainer plus $950$1,350 per board meeting plus a retainer of $6,000 to its directorseach board member during 2008 and $2252011. Members of the Audit Committee were paid $500 per audit committee meeting attended.

Members of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee were paid $200 per meeting attended. The Corporation sponsorsChair of the Board is paid a nonqualified deferred compensation planretainer of $33,000 and the Chair for the Audit Committee is paid a retainer of $4,000. Fees paid to Dianne C. Morey during 2011 were significantly less than the other directors (the “Directors’ Plan”), pursuantdue to whichher resignation from the Corporation’s Board of Directors on April 27, 2011.

Pursuant to the Directors’ Plan the directors of the Corporation and its subsidiaries are required to defer at least 25% of their earned board fees. Under the Directors’ Plan, deferred directors’ fees are converted on a quarterly basis into shares of the Corporation’s common stock, based on the fair market value of a share of the Corporation’s common stock at that time. Shares of stock credited to a participant’s account are eligible for cash and stock dividends as payable. ParticipantsDirectors of the Corporation deferred $483,405$444,905 under the Directors’ Plan in 2008.

2011.

Upon a participant’s attainment of age 70, retirement from the board,Board, or the occurrence of certain other events, the participant is eligible to receive a lump-sum, in-kind distribution of all of the stock that is then credited to his or


12


her account. The plan does not allow for cash settlement. Stock issued under the Directors’ Plan is restricted stock under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

The Corporation established a Rabbi Trust (the Trust) effective as of January 1, 2008 to fund the Directors’ Plan. The Trust is an irrevocable grantor trust to which the Corporation may contribute assets for the limited purpose of funding a nonqualified deferred compensation plan. Although the Corporation may not reach the assets of the Trust for any purpose other than meeting its obligations under the Directors’ Plan, the assets of the Trust remain subject to the claims of the Corporation’s creditors. The Corporation may contribute cash or common stock to the Trust from time to time for the sole purpose of funding the Directors’ Plan. The Trust will use any cash that the Corporation may contribute to it to purchase shares of the Corporation’s common stock on the open market through the Corporation’s brokerage services department.

The Corporation transferred $248,693$440,155 to the Rabbi Trust in 2008,2011, which held 5,24816,585 shares of the Corporation’s common stock for settlement as of December 31, 2008.2011. As of December 31, 2008,2011, there were 186,766201,438 shares of stock credited to participants’ accounts, as adjusted for the 10% stock dividend paid on February 29, 2008, which credits are unfunded as of such date to the extent that they are in excess of the stock and cash that has been credited to the Trust. All amounts are unsecured claims against the Corporation’s general assets. The net cost of this benefit to the Corporation was $119,616$183,703 in 2008.

2011.

The following table displays the number of equity shares grantedcredited to the accounts of active directors pursuant to the terms of the Directors’ Plan as of December 31, 2008:

2011:

Name

# of shares of
stock  credited

Dennis P Angner

   9,924  
# of Shares
of Stock
Name
Granted
Dennis P Angner

Jeffrey J. Barnes

   2,3684,561  

Richard JJ. Barz

   1,8457,461  

Sandra L. Caul

   13,07417,806  

James C. Fabiano

   35,65747,518  
Ted Kortes

G. Charles Hubscher

   3387,406  
David Maness

Thomas L. Kleinhardt

   6,18613,251  
W.

Joseph ManifoldLaFramboise

   4,1425,416  
W. Michael McGuire

David J. Maness

   2,81315,858  
William J Strickler

W. Joseph Manifold

   16,1919,667  
Dale Weburg

W. Michael McGuire

   8,3825,845

Dale D. Weburg

15,651  

Compensation and Human Resource Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

The Compensation and Human Resource Committee of the Corporation is responsible for reviewing and recommending to the Corporation’s Board of Directors the compensation of the PresidentChief Executive Officer and other executive officers of the Corporation, benefit plans and the overall percentage increase in salaries. The committee consists of directors Maness, Barnes, Caul, Fabiano, Caul, Kortes,Hubscher, Kleinhardt, LaFramboise, Manifold, McGuire, Maness, Manifold, Strickler, and Weburg.

Indebtedness of and Transactions with Management

Certain directors and officers of the Corporation and members of their families were loan customers of Isabella Bank, or have been directors or officers of corporations, or partners of partnerships which have had transactions with the subsidiary Bank. In management’s opinion, all such transactions arewere made in the ordinary course of business and arewere substantially on the same terms, including collateral and interest rates, as those prevailing at

the same time for comparable transactions with customers not related to the Bank. These transactions do not involve more than normal risk of collectability or present other unfavorable features. Total loans to these customers were approximately $4,011,000$3,728,000 as of December 31, 2008.2011. The Corporation addresses transactions with related parties in its’Code Code of Business Conduct and Ethics’policyEthics Policy.Conflicts of interest are prohibited as a matter of Corporation policy, except under guidelines approved by the Board of Directors or committees of the Board.


13


Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management

As of April 1, 2009March 28, 2012 the Corporation does not have any person who is known to the Corporation to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of the common stock of the Corporation.

The following table sets forth certain information as of April 1, 2009March 28, 2012 as to the common stock of the Corporation owned beneficially by each director and director nominee, by each named executive officer, and by all directors, director nominees and executive officers of the Corporation as a group. The shares to be granted from stock awardscredited under the Directors’ Plan are not included in the table below.

                 
  Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership 
  Sole Voting
  Shared Voting
  Total
  Percentage of
 
  and Investment
  and Investment
  Beneficial
  Common Stock
 
Name of Owner
 Powers  Powers  Ownership  Outstanding 
 
Dennis P. Angner*  20,946      20,946   0.28%
Richard J Barz*  23,915      23,915   0.32%
Sandra L. Caul     10,242   10,242   0.14%
James C. Fabiano  250,930   6,059   256,989   3.42%
Theodore W. Kortes     15,115   15,115   0.20%
W. Joseph Manifold  543      543   0.01%
W. Michael McGuire  6,177      6,177   0.08%
David J. Maness  429   951   1,381   0.02%
William J. Strickler  78,126   13,029   91,154   1.21%
Dale D. Weburg  25,642   29,969   55,611   0.74%
Timothy M. Miller  77   2,946   3,024   0.04%
Steven D. Pung  12,752   7,160   19,912   0.26%
Peggy L. Wheeler  5,730   2,256   7,986   0.11%
                 
All Directors, nominees and Executive Officers as a Group (13 persons)  425,268   87,727   512,995   6.83%
                 

  Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership 

Name of Owner

 Sole Voting
and  Investment
Powers
   Shared Voting
or Investment
Powers
   Total
Beneficial
Ownership
   Percentage of
Common  Stock
Outstanding
 

Dennis P. Angner*

  18,712          18,712     0.25

Jeffrey J. Barnes

       5,837     5,837     0.08

Richard J. Barz*

  18,911          18,911     0.25

Sandra L. Caul

       10,609     10,609     0.14

James C. Fabiano

  272,708     6,773     279,481     3.67

G. Charles Hubscher

  28,860     3,523     32,383     0.43

Thomas L. Kleinhardt

       31,546     31,546     0.41

Joseph LaFramboise

  200     937     1,137     0.01

David J. Maness

  480     1,274     1,754     0.02

W. Joseph Manifold

  2,107          2,107     0.03

W. Michael McGuire

  116,462          116,462     1.53

Dale D. Weburg

  28,665     32,620     61,285     0.80

Timothy M. Miller

  258     3,428     3,686     0.05

Steven D. Pung

  9,752     8,647     18,399     0.24

David J. Reetz

  8,871     181     9,051     0.12
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

All Directors, nominees and Executive

Officers as a Group (15) persons

  505,985     105,374     611,360     8.03
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

*Trustees of the ESOP who vote ESOP stock.

Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Audit Committee has appointed Rehmann Robson, P.C. as the independent auditors of the Corporation for the year ending December 31, 2009.

2012.

A representative of Rehmann Robson, P.C. is expected to be present at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to respond to appropriate questions from shareholders and to make any comments they believeRehmann Robson, P.C. believes are appropriate.

Fees for Professional Services Provided by Rehmann Robson, P.C.

The following table shows the aggregate fees billed by Rehmann Robson, P.C. for the audit and other services provided to the Corporation for 20082011 and 2007.

         
  2008  2007 
 
Audit Fees $238,275  $371,860 
Audit Related Fees  52,415   31,365 
Tax Fees  65,257   28,750 
Other Professional Services Fees  15,098   16,450 
         
Total $371,045  $448,425 
         


14

2010.


  2011  2010

Audit fees

  $253,920    $252,163 

Audit related fees

   17,510     39,089 

Tax fees

   20,175     24,730 
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

  $291,605    $315,982 
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

The audit fees were for performing the integrated audit of the Corporation’s consolidated annual financial statements and the audit of internal control over financial reporting related to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act, review of interim quarterly financial statements included in the Corporation’sForms 10-Q, auditing of the Corporation’s employee benefit plans and services that are normally provided by Rehmann Robson, P.C. in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements. The audit fees have steadily declined over the past few years as a result of the centralization of corporate processes and diligently working on improving efficiencies related to Sarbanes Oxley (SOX) compliance.

The audit related fees for 2008 and 2007 were for regulatory filings and procedures related to the acquisition of Greenville Community Financial Corporation andare typically for various discussions related to the adoption and interpretation of new accounting pronouncements.

During 2010, this includes fees for procedures related to an SEC comment letter and other nonrecurring regulatory filings. Also included are fees for auditing of the Corporation’s employee benefit plans.

The tax fees were for the preparation of the CorporationCorporation’s and its subsidiaries’ state and federal tax returns and for consultation with the Corporation on various tax matters. The increase in the 2008 tax fees is primarily related to tax consulting for an audit conducted by the State of Michigan for Single Business Tax (SBT), the 2007 Greenville Community Financial Corporation final tax return preparation, and tax consulting related to the joint venture with CT/IBT Title (refer to Note 2 of the Corporation’s consolidated financial statement).

The Audit Committee has considered whether the services provided by Rehmann Robson, P.C., other than the audit fees, are compatible with maintaining Rehmann Robson’sRobson, P.C.’s independence and believes that the other services provided are compatible.

Pre-approvalPre-Approval Policies and Procedures

All audit and non-audit services over $5,000 to be performed by Rehmann Robson, P.C. must be approved in advance by the Audit Committee.Committee if those fees are reasonably expected to exceed 5.0% of the current year agreed upon fee for independent audit services. As permitted by the SEC’s rules, the Audit Committee has authorized its Chairperson to pre-approve audit, audit-related, tax and non-audit services, provided that such approved service is reported to the full Audit Committee at its next meeting.

As early as practicable in each calendar year, the independent auditor provides to the Audit Committee a schedule of the audit and other services that the independent auditor expects to provide or may provide during the next twelve months. The schedule will be specific as to the nature of the proposed services, the proposed fees, timing, and other details that the Audit Committee may request. The Audit Committee will by resolution authorize or decline the proposed services. Upon approval, this schedule will serve as the budget for fees by specific activity or service for the next twelve months.

A schedule of additional services proposed to be provided by the independent auditor, or proposed revisions to services already approved, along with associated proposed fees, may be presented to the Audit Committee for their consideration and approval at any time. The schedule will be specific as to the nature of the proposed service, the proposed fee, and other details that the Audit Committee may request. The Audit Committee will by resolution authorize or decline authorization for each proposed new service.

Applicable SEC rules and regulations permit waiver of the pre-approval requirements for services other than audit, review or attest services if certain conditions are met. Out of the services characterized above as Audit-Related, Taxaudit-related, tax and Professional Services,professional services, none were billed pursuant to these provisions in 20082011 and 20072010 without pre-approval.

pre-approval as required under the Corporation’s policies.

Shareholder Proposals

Any proposals which shareholders of the Corporation intend to present at the next annual meeting of the Corporation must be received before December 11, 20096, 2012 to be considered for inclusion in the Corporation’s proxy statement and proxy for that meeting. Proposals should be made in accordance with Securities and Exchange CommissionRule 14a-8.


15


Directors’ Attendance at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders

The Corporation’s directors are encouraged to attend the annual meeting of shareholders. At the 20082011 annual meeting, all directors were in attendance.

attendance with the exception of Fabiano.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires the Corporation’s directors and certain officers and persons who own more than ten percent of the Corporation’s common stock, to file with the SEC initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership of the Corporation’s common stock. These officers, directors, and greater than ten percent shareholders are required by SEC regulation to furnish the Corporation with copies of these reports.

To the Corporation’s knowledge, based solely on review of the copies of such reports furnished to the Corporation, during the year ended December 31, 20082011 all Section 16(a) filing requirements were satisfied, with respect to the applicable officers, directors, and greater than 10 percent beneficial owners.

Other Matters

The cost of soliciting proxies will be borne by the Corporation. In addition to solicitation by mail, officers and other employees of the Corporation may solicit proxies by telephone or in person, without compensation other than their regular compensation.

As to Other Business Which May Come Before the Meeting

Management of the Corporation does not intend to bring any other business before the meeting for action. However, if any other business should be presented for action, it is the intention of the persons named in the enclosed form of proxy to vote in accordance with their judgment on such business.

By order of the Board of Directors

-s- DEBRA CAMPBELL

LOGO

Debra Campbell, Secretary


16



SUMMARY OF SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
                     
  2008  2007  2006  2005  2004 
  (Dollars in thousands except per share data) 
 
INCOME STATEMENT DATA                    
Total interest income $61,385  $53,972  $44,709  $36,882  $33,821 
Net interest income  35,779   28,013   24,977   23,909   23,364 
Provision for loan losses  9,500   1,211   682   777   735 
Net income  4,101   7,930   7,001   6,776   6,645 
BALANCE SHEET DATA                    
End of year assets $1,139,263  $957,282  $910,127  $741,654  $678,034 
Daily average assets  1,113,102   925,631   800,174   700,624   675,157 
Daily average deposits  817,041   727,762   639,046   576,091   567,145 
Daily average loans/net  708,434   596,739   515,539   459,310   430,854 
Daily average equity  143,626   119,246   91,964   74,682   70,787 
PER SHARE DATA(1)                    
Earnings per share                    
Basic $0.55  $1.14  $1.12  $1.14  $1.13 
Diluted  0.53   1.11   1.09   1.14   1.13 
Cash dividends  0.65   0.62   0.58   0.55   0.52 
Book value (at year end)  17.89   17.58   16.61   13.44   12.25 
FINANCIAL RATIOS                    
Shareholders’ equity to assets (at year end)  11.80%  12.86%  12.72%  10.91%  10.71%
Return on average equity  2.86   6.65   7.61   9.07   9.39 
Return on average tangible equity  4.41   8.54   8.31   9.12   10.01 
Cash dividend payout to net income  118.82   54.27   53.92   48.02   46.20 
Return on average assets  0.37   0.86   0.87   0.97   0.98 
                                 
  2008  2007 
  4th  3rd  2nd  1st  4th  3rd  2nd  1st 
 
Quarterly Operating Results:                                
Total interest income $15,099  $15,401  $15,359  $15,526  $13,747  $13,794  $13,539  $12,892 
Interest expense  5,836   6,309   6,379   7,082   6,466   6,690   6,554   6,249 
                                 
Net interest income  9,263   9,092   8,980   8,444   7,281   7,104   6,985   6,643 
Provision for loan losses  5,725   975   1,593   1,207   593   268   224   126 
Noninterest income  1,130   2,377   1,778   2,517   2,605   2,719   2,227   2,411 
Noninterest expenses  8,377   7,430   7,341   7,556   6,597   6,995   6,833   6,804 
Net (loss) income  (2,041)  2,524   1,691   1,927   2,268   2,096   1,756   1,810 
Per Share of Common Stock:(1)                                 
Earnings (loss) per share                                
Basic $(0.28) $0.34  $0.23  $0.26  $0.33  $0.30  $0.25  $0.26 
Diluted  (0.27)  0.33   0.22   0.25   0.32   0.29   0.25   0.25 
Cash dividends  0.29   0.12   0.12   0.12   0.29   0.11   0.11   0.11 
Book value (at quarter end)  17.89   18.78   18.75   19.07   17.58   17.38   17.04   16.77 
(1)Retroactively restated for the 10% stock dividend, paid on February 29, 2008.


18


(Dollars in thousands except per share data)

   2011  2010  2009  2008  2007 

INCOME STATEMENT DATA

      

Total interest income

  $57,905   $57,217   $58,105   $61,385   $53,972  

Net interest income

   41,702    40,013    38,266    35,779    28,013  

Provision for loan losses

   3,826    4,857    6,093    9,500    1,211  

Net income

   10,210    9,045    7,800    4,101    7,930  

BALANCE SHEET DATA

      

End of year assets

  $1,337,925   $1,225,810   $1,143,944   $1,139,263   $957,282  

Daily average assets

   1,287,195    1,182,930    1,127,634    1,113,102    925,631  

Daily average deposits

   927,186    840,392    786,714    817,041    727,762  

Daily average loans/net

   730,919    712,272    712,965    708,434    596,739  

Daily average equity

   145,725    139,855    139,810    143,626    119,246  

PER SHARE DATA

      

Earnings per share

      

Basic

  $1.35   $1.20   $1.04   $0.55   $1.14  

Diluted

   1.31    1.17    1.01    0.53    1.11  

Cash dividends

   0.76    0.72    0.70    0.65    0.62  

Book value (at year end)

   20.40    19.23    18.69    17.89    17.58  

FINANCIAL RATIOS

      

Shareholders’ equity to assets (at year end)

   11.57  11.84  12.31  11.80  12.86

Return on average equity

   7.01    6.47    5.58    2.86    6.65  

Return on average tangible equity

   10.30    9.55    8.53    4.41    8.54  

Cash dividend payout to net income

   56.51    59.93    67.40    118.82    54.27  

Return on average assets

   0.79    0.76    0.69    0.37    0.86  

  2011  2010 
   4th  3rd  2nd  1st  4th  3rd  2nd  1st 

Quarterly Operating Results:

        

Total interest income

 $14,466   $14,532   $14,669   $14,238   $14,540   $14,306   $14,272   $14,099  

Interest expense

  3,979    4,070    4,101    4,053    4,217    4,296    4,291    4,400  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net interest income

  10,487    10,462    10,568    10,185    10,323    10,010    9,981    9,699  

Provision for loan losses

  1,443    963    603    817    1,626    968    1,056    1,207  

Noninterest income

  2,433    1,859    1,978    1,948    2,629    2,634    1,870    2,167  

Noninterest expenses

  8,651    8,513    8,779    8,587    8,558    8,620    8,275    8,354  

Net income

  2,711    2,511    2,672    2,316    2,318    2,553    2,151    2,023  

Per Share of Common Stock:

        

Earnings per share

        

Basic

 $0.36   $0.33   $0.35   $0.31   $0.30   $0.34   $0.29   $0.27  

Diluted

  0.35    0.32    0.34    0.30    0.30    0.33    0.28    0.26  

Cash dividends

  0.19    0.19    0.19    0.19    0.18    0.18    0.18    0.18  

Book value (at quarter end)

  20.40    20.53    20.00    19.52    19.23    19.59    19.39    18.89  

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMReport of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Shareholders and Board of Directors

Isabella Bank Corporation

Mt.

Mount Pleasant, Michigan

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets ofIsabella Bank Corporationas of December 31, 20082011 and 2007,2010, and the related consolidated statements of changes in shareholders’ equity, income, comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2008.2011. We also have auditedIsabella Bank Corporation’sinternal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008,2011, based on criteria established in theInternal Control-Integrated Frameworkissued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).Isabella Bank Corporation’smanagement is responsible for these consolidated financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements and an opinion on the effectiveness of theIsabella Bank Corporation’sinternal control over financial reporting, based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audits of the consolidated financial statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material misstatement exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A corporation’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of consolidated financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A corporation’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the corporation; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of consolidated financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the corporation are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the corporation; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the corporation’s assets that could have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

As described in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, effective January 1, 2008 the Corporation adopted EITF IssueNo. 06-4,Accounting for Deferred Compensation and Postretirement Benefit Aspects of Endorsement Split-Dollar Life Insurance Arrangements. Also, as described in Notes 17 and 20 to the consolidated financial statements, effective January 1, 2007 the Corporation elected the early adoption of Statements of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No.’s 159,The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities,and 157,Fair Value Measurements,and effective December 31, 2006 changed its method of accounting for defined benefit pension and other postretirement plans in accordance with SFAS No. 158,Employer’s Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans.


19


In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position ofIsabella Bank Corporationas of December 31, 20082011 and 2007,2010, and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 20082011 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also, in our opinionIsabella Bank Corporationmaintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008,2011, based on the criteria established in theInternal Control-Integrated Frameworkissued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations (COSO) of the Treadway Commission.
-s- Rehmann Robson P.C.

LOGO

Rehmann Robson, P.C.

Saginaw, Michigan

March 6, 2009


202012


CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
         
  December 31 
  2008  2007 
  (Dollars in thousands) 
 
ASSETS
Cash and demand deposits due from banks $23,554  $25,583 
Trading securities  21,775   25,064 
Investment securities available for sale (amortized cost of $248,741 in 2008 and $212,285 in 2007)  246,455   213,127 
Mortgage loans available for sale  898   2,214 
Net loans        
Loans  735,385   612,687 
Less allowance for loan losses  11,982   7,301 
         
Total net loans
  723,403   605,386 
Premises and equipment  23,231   22,516 
Corporate-owned life insurance policies  16,152   13,195 
Accrued interest receivable  6,322   5,948 
Acquisition intangibles and goodwill, net  47,804   27,010 
Equity securities without readily determinable fair values  17,345   7,353 
Other assets  12,324   9,886 
         
Total assets
 $1,139,263  $957,282 
         
 
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Deposits        
Noninterest bearing $97,546  $84,846 
NOW accounts  113,973   105,526 
Certificates of deposit and other savings  422,689   410,782 
Certificates of deposit over $100,000  141,422   132,319 
         
Total deposits
  775,630   733,473 
Other borrowed funds ($23,130 in 2008 and 7,523 in 2007 at fair value)  222,350   92,887 
Escrow funds payable     1,912 
Accrued interest and other liabilities  6,807   5,930 
         
Total liabilities
  1,004,787   834,202 
         
Shareholders’ Equity        
Common stock — no par value 15,000,000 shares authorized; outstanding — 7,518,856 (including 5,248 shares to be issued) in 2008 and 6,364,120 in 2007  133,602   112,547 
Shares to be issued for deferred compensation obligations  4,015   3,772 
Retained earnings  2,428   7,027 
Accumulated other comprehensive loss  (5,569)  (266)
         
Total shareholders’ equity
  134,476   123,080 
         
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity
 $1,139,263  $957,282 
         

(Dollars in thousands)

   December 31, 
   2011   2010 

ASSETS

  

Cash and cash equivalents

    

Cash and demand deposits due from banks

  $24,514    $16,978  

Interest bearing balances due from banks

   4,076     1,131  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total cash and cash equivalents

   28,590     18,109  

Certificates of deposit held in other financial institutions

   8,924     15,808  

Trading securities

   4,710     5,837  

Available-for-sale securities (amortized cost of $414,614 in 2011 and $329,435 in 2010)

   425,120     330,724  

Mortgage loans available-for-sale

   3,205     1,182  

Loans

    

Agricultural

   74,645     71,446  

Commercial

   365,714     348,852  

Consumer

   31,572     30,977  

Residential real estate mortgage

   278,360     284,029  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total loans

   750,291     735,304  

Less allowance for loan losses

   12,375     12,373  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net loans

   737,916     722,931  

Premises and equipment

   24,626     24,627  

Corporate owned life insurance

   22,075     17,466  

Accrued interest receivable

   5,848     5,456  

Equity securities without readily determinable fair values

   17,189     17,564  

Goodwill and other intangible assets

   46,792     47,091  

Other assets

   12,930     19,015  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

TOTAL ASSETS

  $1,337,925    $1,225,810  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

  

Deposits

    

Noninterest bearing

  $119,072    $104,902  

NOW accounts

   163,653     142,259  

Certificates of deposit under $100 and other savings

   440,123     425,981  

Certificates of deposit over $100

   235,316     204,197  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total deposits

   958,164     877,339  

Borrowed funds ($5,242 in 2011 and $10,423 in 2010 at fair value)

   216,136     194,917  

Accrued interest payable and other liabilities

   8,842     8,393  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total liabilities

   1,183,142     1,080,649  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Shareholders’ equity

    

Common stock — no par value 15,000,000 shares authorized; issued and outstanding 7,589,226 (including 16,585 shares held in the Rabbi Trust) in 2011 and 7,550,074 (including 32,686 shares held in the Rabbi Trust) in 2010

   134,734     133,592  

Shares to be issued for deferred compensation obligations

   4,524     4,682  

Retained earnings

   13,036     8,596  

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)

   2,489     (1,709
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total shareholders’ equity

   154,783     145,161  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY

  $1,337,925    $1,225,810  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


21


CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
             
  Year Ended December 31 
  2008  2007  2006 
  (Dollars in thousands) 
 
Number of Shares of Common Stock Outstanding
            
Balance at beginning of year  6,364,120   6,335,861   4,974,715 
Common stock dividends  687,599      497,299 
Shares issued in exchange for bank acquisition  514,809      797,475 
Other issuances of common stock  100,664   71,479   66,372 
Common stock repurchased  (148,336)  (43,220)   
             
Balance end of year
  7,518,856   6,364,120   6,335,861 
             
Common Stock
            
Balance at beginning of year $112,547  $111,648  $69,592 
Common stock dividends (10)%  30,256      20,887 
Regulatory capital transfer  (28,000)     (12,000)
Issuances of common stock in exchange for bank acquisition  22,652      30,448 
Issuance of common stock  2,836   2,780   2,721 
Common stock purchased for deferred compensation obligations  (249)      
Common stock repurchased  (6,440)  (1,881)   
             
Balance end of year
  133,602   112,547   111,648 
Shares to be issued for deferred compensation obligations
            
Balance at beginning of year  3,772   3,137   2,704 
Share-based payment awards under equity compensation plan  603   758   470 
Issuance of common stock  (360)  (123)  (37)
             
Balance end of year
  4,015   3,772   3,137 
Retained Earnings
            
Balance at beginning of year  7,027   4,451   10,112 
Adjustment to initially apply FASB Statement No. 159, net of tax     (1,050)   
Adjustment to initially apply EITF06-4, net of tax
  (1,571)      
Net income  4,101   7,930   7,001 
Common stock dividends (10)%  (30,256)     (20,887)
Regulatory capital transfer  28,000      12,000 
Cash dividends ($0.65 per share in 2008, $0.62 per share in 2007, $0.58 per share in 2006)  (4,873)  (4,304)  (3,775)
             
Balance end of year
  2,428   7,027   4,451 
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
            
Balance at beginning of year  (266)  (3,487)  (1,506)
Cumulative adjustment to initially apply the fair value option of FASB Statement No. 159, net of tax     827     
Cumulative adjustment to initially apply FASB Statement No. 158, net of tax        (2,728)
Other comprehensive (loss) income  (5,303)  2,324   747 
             
Balance end of year
  (5,569)  (266)  (3,487)
Total shareholders’ equity end of year
 $134,476  $123,080  $115,749 
             

(Dollars in thousands except per share data)

  Common Stock
Shares
Outstanding
  Common
Stock
  Shares to be
Issued for
Deferred
Compensation
Obligations
  Retained
Earnings
  Accumulated Other
Comprehensive
(Loss) Income
  Totals 

Balance, January 1, 2009

  7,518,856   $133,602   $4,015   $2,428   $(5,569 $134,476  

Comprehensive income

              7,800    3,450    11,250  

Issuance of common stock

  126,059    2,664                2,664  

Common stock issued for deferred compensation obligations

  12,890    331    (185          146  

Share based payment awards under equity compensation plan

          677            677  

Common stock purchased for deferred compensation obligations

      (767        (767

Common stock repurchased pursuant to publicly announced repurchase plan

  (122,612  (2,387           (2,387

Cash dividends ($0.70 per share)

              (5,256      (5,256
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balance, December 31, 2009

  7,535,193    133,443    4,507    4,972    (2,119  140,803  

Comprehensive income

              9,045    410    9,455  

Issuance of common stock

  124,953    2,683                2,683  

Common stock issued for deferred compensation obligations

  28,898    537    (475          62  

Share based payment awards under equity compensation plan

          650            650  

Common stock purchased for deferred compensation obligations

      (514        (514

Common stock repurchased pursuant to publicly announced repurchase plan

  (138,970  (2,557           (2,557

Cash dividends ($0.72 per share)

              (5,421      (5,421
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balance, December 31, 2010

  7,550,074    133,592    4,682    8,596    (1,709  145,161  

Comprehensive income

              10,210    4,198    14,408  

Issuance of common stock

  120,336    3,075                3,075  

Common stock issued for deferred compensation obligations

  39,257    697    (773          (76

Share based payment awards under equity compensation plan

          615            615  

Common stock purchased for deferred compensation obligations

      (426              (426

Common stock repurchased pursuant to publicly announced repurchase plan

  (120,441  (2,204           (2,204

Cash dividends ($0.76 per share)

              (5,770      (5,770
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balance, December 31, 2011

  7,589,226   $134,734   $4,524   $13,036   $2,489   $154,783  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


22


CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
             
  Year Ended December 31 
  2008  2007  2006 
  (Dollars in thousands
 
  except per share data) 
 
Interest Income
            
Loans, including fees $49,674  $43,808  $36,575 
Investment securities            
Taxable  5,433   3,751   4,948 
Nontaxable  4,642   3,657   2,797 
Trading account securities  1,093   2,097    
Federal funds sold and other  543   659   389 
             
Total interest income
  61,385   53,972   44,709 
Interest Expense
            
Deposits  19,873   22,605   17,164 
Borrowings  5,733   3,354   2,568 
             
Total interest expense
  25,606   25,959   19,732 
             
Net interest income
  35,779   28,013   24,977 
Provision for loan losses  9,500   1,211   682 
             
Net interest income after provision for loan losses
  26,279   26,802   24,295 
Noninterest Income
            
Service charges and fees  6,370   5,894   5,490 
Title insurance revenue (Note 2)  234   2,192   2,389 
Gain on sale of mortgage loans  249   209   207 
Net gain on trading securities  245   460    
Other  704   1,207   1,012 
             
Total noninterest income
  7,802   9,962   9,098 
Noninterest Expenses
            
Compensation and benefits  16,992   15,618   13,869 
Occupancy  2,035   1,766   1,730 
Furniture and equipment  3,849   3,297   2,868 
Other  7,828   6,548   6,006 
             
Total noninterest expenses
  30,704   27,229   24,473 
Income before federal income tax (benefit) expense
  3,377   9,535   8,920 
Federal income tax (benefit) expense  (724)  1,605   1,919 
             
Net income
 $4,101  $7,930  $7,001 
             
Earnings per share
            
Basic $0.55  $1.14  $1.12 
             
Diluted $0.53  $1.11  $1.09 
             

(Dollars in thousands except per share data)

   Year Ended December 31 
   2011  2010  2009 

Interest income

    

Loans, including fees

  $45,463   $46,794   $47,706  

Investment securities

    

Taxable

   6,941    5,271    4,712  

Nontaxable

   4,806    4,367    4,623  

Trading account securities

   189    306    687  

Federal funds sold and other

   506    479    377  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total interest income

   57,905    57,217    58,105  

Interest expense

    

Deposits

   10,935    11,530    13,588  

Borrowings

   5,268    5,674    6,251  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total interest expense

   16,203    17,204    19,839  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net interest income

   41,702    40,013    38,266  

Provision for loan losses

   3,826    4,857    6,093  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net interest income after provision for loan losses

   37,876    35,156    32,173  

Noninterest income

    

Service charges and fees

   6,118    6,480    6,913  

Gain on sale of mortgage loans

   538    610    886  

Net (loss) gain on trading securities

   (78  (94  80  

Net gain on borrowings measured at fair value

   181    227    289  

Gain on sale of available-for-sale investment securities

   3    348    648  

Other

   1,456    1,729    1,340  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total noninterest income

   8,218    9,300    10,156  

Noninterest expenses

    

Compensation and benefits

   19,292    18,552    18,258  

Occupancy

   2,470    2,351    2,170  

Furniture and equipment

   4,497    4,344    4,146  

FDIC insurance premiums

   1,086    1,254    1,730  

Other

   7,185    7,306    7,379  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total noninterest expenses

   34,530    33,807    33,683  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Income before federal income tax expense

   11,564    10,649    8,646  

Federal income tax expense

   1,354    1,604    846  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

NET INCOME

  $10,210   $9,045   $7,800  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Earnings per share

    

Basic

  $1.35   $1.20   $1.04  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Diluted

  $1.31   $1.17   $1.01  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Cash dividends per basic share

  $0.76   $0.72   $0.70  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


23


CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
             
  Year Ended December 31 
  2008  2007  2006 
  (Dollars in thousands) 
 
Net income
 $4,101  $7,930  $7,001 
             
Unrealized holding gains on available-for-sale securities:            
Unrealized (losses) gains arising during the year  (3,104)  614   1,020 
Reclassification adjustment for net realized (gains) losses included in net income  (24)  19   112 
             
Net unrealized (losses) gains  (3,128)  633   1,132 
Tax effect  (643)  (216)  (385)
             
Unrealized (losses) gains, net of tax  (3,771)  417   747 
             
(Increase) reduction of unrecognized pension cost  (2,320)  2,890    
Tax effect  788   (983)   
             
Net unrealized (loss) gain on defined benefit pension plan  (1,532)  1,907    
             
Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax
  (5,303)  2,324   747 
             
Comprehensive income
 $(1,202) $10,254  $7,748 
             

(Dollars in thousands)

   Year Ended December 31 
   2011  2010  2009 

Net income

  $10,210   $9,045   $7,800  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Unrealized holding gains on available-for-sale securities:

    

Unrealized gains arising during the year

   9,220    1,156    3,415  

Reclassification adjustment for net realized gains included in net income

   (3  (348  (648
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net unrealized gains

   9,217    808    2,767  

Tax effect

   (3,719  (351  436  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Unrealized gains, net of tax

   5,498    457    3,203  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

(Increase) reduction of unrecognized pension costs

   (1,971  (72  374  

Tax effect

   671    25    (127
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net unrealized (loss) gain on defined benefit pension plan

   (1,300  (47  247  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Other comprehensive income, net of tax

   4,198    410    3,450  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Comprehensive income

  $14,408   $9,455   $11,250  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


24


CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)
             
  Year Ended December 31 
  2008  2007  2006 
  (Dollars in thousands) 
 
Operating activities
            
Net income $4,101  $7,930  $7,001 
Reconciliation of net income to cash provided by (used in) operations:            
Provision for loan losses  9,500   1,211   682 
Provision for foreclosed asset losses  231   109    
Depreciation  2,171   1,960   1,852 
Amortization and impairment of mortgage servicing rights  346   201   184 
Amortization of acquisition intangibles  415   278   160 
Net amortization of investment securities  356   216   705 
Realized (gain) loss on sale of available-for-sale investment securities  (24)  19   112 
Unrealized gains on trading securities  (245)  (460)   
Unrealized losses on borrowings measured at fair value  641   66    
Earnings on corporate owned life insurance policies  (616)  (432)  (404)
Share-based payment awards under equity compensation plan  603   758   470 
Deferred income tax (benefit) expense  (1,812)  301   274 
Net changes in operating assets and liabilities which provided (used) cash, net in 2008 and 2006 of bank acquisitions and of the 2008 joint venture formation:            
Trading securities  8,513   53,235    
Loans held for sale  1,316   520   (1,990)
Accrued interest receivable  226   (183)  (626)
Other assets  (3,565)  (4,667)  (1,424)
Escrow funds payable  (46)  (504)  (7,407)
Accrued interest and other liabilities  (1,450)  (171)  (1,378)
             
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
  20,661   60,387   (1,789)
Investing activities
            
Activity in available-for-sale securities            
Maturities, calls, and sales  66,387   54,997   57,577 
Purchases  (96,168)  (132,115)  (70,140)
Loan principal originations, net  (42,700)  (24,455)  (44,805)
Proceeds from sales of foreclosed assets  2,310   662   524 
Purchases of premises and equipment  (2,990)  (3,722)  (2,467)
Bank acquisition, net of cash acquired  (9,465)     (2,713)
Cash contributed to title company joint venture formation  (4,542)      
Purchase of corporate owned life insurance policies  (1,560)     (499)
             
Net cash used in investing activities
  (88,728)  (104,633)  (62,523)
Financing activities
            
Net (decrease) increase in deposits  (47,892)  7,633   60,024 
Net increase in other borrowed funds  123,016   34,365   6,138 
Cash dividends paid on common stock  (4,873)  (4,304)  (3,775)
Proceeds from issuance of common stock  2,476   2,657   2,459 
Common stock repurchased  (6,440)  (1,881)   
Common stock purchased for deferred compensation obligations  (249)      
             
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
  66,038   38,470   64,846 
             
(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents
  (2,029)  (5,776)  534 
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year  25,583   31,359   30,825 
             
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year
 $23,554  $25,583  $31,359 
             
Supplemental cash flows information:            
Interest paid $25,556  $25,872  $19,392 
Federal income taxes paid  1,155   1,776   1,516 
Transfer of loans to foreclosed assets  3,398   1,295   433 

(Dollars in thousands)

   Year Ended December 31 
   2011  2010  2009 

OPERATING ACTIVITIES

    

Net income

  $10,210   $9,045   $7,800  

Reconciliation of net income to net cash provided by operations:

    

Provision for loan losses

   3,826    4,857    6,093  

Impairment of foreclosed assets

   82    180    157  

Depreciation

   2,521    2,522    2,349  

Amortization and impairment of originated mortgage servicing rights

   714    543    683  

Amortization of acquisition intangibles

   299    338    375  

Net amortization of available-for-sale securities

   1,689    1,153    741  

Gain on sale of available-for-sale securities

   (3  (348  (648

Net unrealized losses (gains) on trading securities

   78    94    (80

Net gain on sale of mortgage loans

   (538  (610  (886

Net unrealized gains on borrowings measured at fair value

   (181  (227  (289

Increase in cash value of corporate owned life insurance

   (609  (642  (641

Realized gain on redemption of corporate owned life insurance

       (21    

Share-based payment awards under equity compensation plan

   615    650    677  

Deferred income tax expense (benefit)

   389    179    (641

Origination of loans held for sale

   (57,584  (72,106  (153,388

Proceeds from loan sales

   56,099    73,815    152,891  

Net changes in operating assets and liabilities which provided (used) cash:

    

Trading securities

   1,049    7,632    8,292  

Accrued interest receivable

   (392  376    490  

Other assets

   147    (1,914  (6,331

Accrued interest payable and other liabilities

   449    1,005    581  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net cash provided by operating activities

   18,860    26,521    18,225  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

INVESTING ACTIVITIES

    

Net change in certificates of deposit held in other financial institutions

   6,884    (10,428  (4,805

Activity in available-for-sale securities

    

Maturities, calls, and sales

   78,152    85,273    130,580  

Purchases

   (165,017  (156,928  (140,517

Loan principal originations and collections, net

   (20,743  (21,319  4,437  

Proceeds from sales of foreclosed assets

   2,041    2,778    4,145  

Purchases of premises and equipment

   (2,520  (3,232  (3,035

Purchases of corporate owned life insurance

   (4,000  (175    

Proceeds from the redemption of corporate owned life insurance

       154    11  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net cash used in investing activities

   (105,203  (103,877  (9,184
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

FINANCING ACTIVITIES

    

Acceptances and withdrawals of deposits, net

  $80,825   $74,687   $27,022  

Increase (decrease) in other borrowed funds

   21,400    2,043    (28,960

Cash dividends paid on common stock

   (5,770  (5,421  (5,256

Proceeds from issuance of common stock

   2,302    2,208    2,479  

Common stock repurchased

   (1,507  (2,020  (2,056

Common stock purchased for deferred compensation obligations

   (426  (514  (767
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

   96,824    70,983    (7,538
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS

   10,481    (6,373  1,503  

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

   18,109    24,482    22,979  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD

  $28,590   $18,109   $24,482  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOWS INFORMATION:

    

Interest paid

  $16,239   $17,344   $20,030  

Federal income taxes paid

   878    1,261    2,237  

SUPPLEMENTAL NONCASH INFORMATION:

    

Transfers of loans to foreclosed assets

  $1,932   $3,868   $2,536  

Common stock issued for deferred compensation obligations

   773    475    185  

Common stock repurchased from an associated grantor trust (Rabbi Trust)

   (697  (537  (33

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


25


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in thousands except per share amounts)

NoteNOTE 1 — Nature of Operations and Summary of Significant Accounting PoliciesNATURE OF OPERATIONS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND CONSOLIDATION:

Basis of Presentation and Consolidation:
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Isabella Bank Corporation (the “Corporation”), a financial services holding company, and its wholly owned subsidiaries, Isabella Bank (the “Bank”), Financial Group Information Services, and IB&T Employee Leasing, LLC. All intercompany balances and accounts have been eliminated in consolidation.

Nature of Operations:NATURE OF OPERATIONS:

Isabella Bank Corporation is a financial services holding company offering a wide array of financial products and services in mid-Michigan.several mid-Michigan counties. Its banking subsidiary, Isabella Bank, offers banking services through 25 locations, 24 locations,24-hourhour banking services locally and nationally through shared automatic teller machines, 24-24 hour online banking, and direct deposits to businesses, institutions, and individuals. Lending services offered include commercial real estate loans, and lines of credit, agricultural loans, residential real estate loans, and consumer loans, student loans, and credit cards.loans. Deposit services include interest and noninterest bearing checking accounts, savings accounts, money market accounts, and certificates of deposit. Other related financial products include trust and investment services, safe deposit box rentals, and credit life insurance. Active competition, principally from other commercial banks, savings banks and credit unions, exists in all of the Bank’sCorporation’s principal markets. The Corporation’s results of operations can be significantly affected by changes in interest rates or changes in the local economic environment.
In April 2007, the Corporation consolidated the charters of FSB Bank and Isabella Bank. The consolidation into a single charter helped to further reduce operating expenses through the elimination of duplications in memberships, licensing, service contracts, compliance, computer platforms, and computer processing. The legal reorganization had no effect on the Corporation’s consolidated financial statements (See “Note 23 — Operating Segments”).
On January 1, 2008, the Corporation acquired 100 percent of Greenville Community Financial Corporation (GCFC). As a result of this acquisition, Greenville Community Bank, a wholly-owned subsidiary of GCFC, merged with and into the Bank (see Note 2 — “Business Combinations and Joint Venture Formation”).
On March 1, 2008, IBT Title and Insurance Agency, Inc. (IBT Title), a wholly owned subsidiary of Isabella Bank Corporation, merged its assets and liabilities with Corporate Title Agency, LLC (“Corporate Title”), a third-party title business based in Traverse City, Michigan, to form CT/IBT Title Agency, LLC. As a result of this transaction, the Corporation became a 50 percent joint venture owner in CT/IBT Title Agency, LLC. The joint venture is accounted for as an equity investment. The purpose of this joint venture was to help IBT Title and Insurance Agency, Inc. expand its service area and to take advantage of economies of scale (see Note 2 — “Business Combinations and Joint Venture Formation”).

Financial Group Information Services provides information technology services to Isabella Bank Corporation and its subsidiaries.

IB&T Employee Leasing provides payroll services, benefit administration, and other human resource services to Isabella Bank Corporation and its subsidiaries.

Use of Estimates:USE OF ESTIMATES:

In preparing consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of the date of the consolidated balance sheet and reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting year. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Material estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant change in the near term relate to the determination of the allowance for loan losses, the fair value of certain available-for-sale investment securities, the valuation of real estate


26


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
acquired in connection with foreclosures or in satisfaction of loans, valuation of goodwill and other intangible assets, and determinations of assumptions in accounting for the defined benefit pension plan,plan.

FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS:    Fair value refers to the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in an orderly transaction between market participants in the market in which the reporting entity transacts such sales or transfers based on the assumptions market participants would use when pricing an asset or liability. Assumptions are developed based on prioritizing information within a fair value hierarchy that gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets and the lowest priority to unobservable data, such as the reporting entity’s own data. The Corporation may choose to measure eligible items at fair value at specified election dates. Unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value measurement option has been elected are reported in earnings at each subsequent reporting date. The fair value option (i) may be applied instrument by instrument, with certain exceptions, allowing the Corporation to record identical financial assets and liabilities at fair value or by another measurement basis permitted under generally accepted accounting principles, (ii) is irrevocable (unless a new election date occurs) and (iii) is applied only to entire instruments and not to portions of instruments.

For assets and liabilities recorded at fair value, it is the Corporation’s policy to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when developing fair value measurements for those financial instruments for which there is an active market. In cases where the market for a financial asset or liability is not active, the Corporation includes appropriate risk adjustments that market participants would make for nonperformance and liquidity risks when developing fair value measurements. Fair value measurements for assets and liabilities for which limited or no observable market data exists are accordingly based primarily upon estimates, are often calculated based on the economic and competitive environment, the characteristics of the asset or liability and other post-retirement liabilities. In connectionfactors. Therefore, the results cannot be determined with the determinationprecision and may not be realized in an actual sale or immediate settlement of the allowance for loan lossesasset or liability. Additionally, there may be inherent weaknesses in any calculation technique, and changes in the underlying assumptions used, including discount rates and estimates of future cash flows, could significantly affect the results of current or future values.

The Corporation utilizes fair value measurements to record fair value adjustments to certain assets and liabilities and to determine fair value disclosures. Investment securities available-for-sale, trading securities, and certain liabilities are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. Additionally, from time to time, the Corporation may be required to record other assets at fair value on a nonrecurring basis, such as mortgage loans available-for-sale, impaired loans, foreclosed assets, originated mortgage servicing rights, goodwill, and certain other assets and liabilities. These nonrecurring fair value adjustments typically involve the application of lower of cost or market accounting or write downs of individual assets.

Fair Value Hierarchy

Under fair value measurement and disclosure authoritative guidance, the Corporation groups assets and liabilities measured at fair value into three levels, based on the markets in which the assets and liabilities are traded, and the carryingreliability of the assumptions used to determine fair value, based on the prioritization of foreclosed real estate, management obtains independent appraisalsinputs in the valuation techniques. These levels are:

Level 1:    Valuation is based upon quoted prices for identical instruments traded in active markets.

Level 2:    Valuation is based upon quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active and model based valuation techniques for which all significant properties.

assumptions are observable in the market.

Significant Group ConcentrationsLevel 3:    Valuation is generated from model based techniques that use at least one significant assumption not observable in the market. These unobservable assumptions reflect estimates of Credit Risk:assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability.

The asset’s or liability’s fair value measurement level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of any input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Valuation techniques maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. Transfers between measurement levels are recognized at the end of reporting periods.

For a further discussion of fair value considerations, refer to Note 20 to the consolidated financial statements.

SIGNIFICANT GROUP CONCENTRATIONS OF CREDIT RISK:

Most of the Corporation’s activities conducted are with customers located within the central Michigan area. A significant amount of its outstanding loans are secured by commercial and residential real estate or are made to finance agricultural production.estate. Other than these types of loans, there is no significant concentration to any other industry or any one customer.

Cash and Cash Equivalents:CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS:

For purposes of the consolidated statements of cash flows, cash and cash equivalents include cash and balances due from banks, federal funds sold, and other deposit accounts, all of which have original maturity dates within ninety days.accounts. Generally, federal funds sold are for a one day period. The Corporation maintains deposit accounts in various financial institutions which generally exceed federally insured limits or are not insured.
Management does not believe the Company is exposed to any significant interest, credit or other financial risk as a result of these deposits.

Trading Securities:CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT HELD IN OTHER FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS:

Effective January 1, 2007,    Certificates of deposits held in conjunction with the early adoptionother financial institutions consist of the fair value optioninterest bearing certificates of SFAS No. 159 (see Note 20), thedeposit that mature within 3 years and are carried at cost.

TRADING SECURITIES:    The Corporation engages in trading activities forof its own account.accounts. Securities that are held principally for resale in the near term are recorded in the trading assets account at fair value with unrealized changes in fair value recorded in noninterest income. Interest and dividends areincome is included in net interest income.

Available-For-Sale Investment Securities:AVAILA

BLE-FOR-SALE INVESTMENT SECURITIES:    All purchases of investment securities are generally classified as available-for-sale. However, classification of investment securities as either held to maturity or trading may be elected by management of the Corporation. Securities classified as “available-for-sale”, other than money market preferred securities,available-for-sale are recorded at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses, net of the effect of deferred income taxes, excluded from earnings and reported in other comprehensive income. Available — for-saleAuction rate money market preferred securities and preferred stocks are considered equity securities for federal income tax purposes, and as such, no estimated federal income tax impact is expected or recorded. Auction rate money market preferred securities and preferred stock are recorded at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses, considered not other-than-temporary, excluded from earnings and reported in other comprehensive income.
Purchase premiums and discounts are recognized in interest income using the interest method over the terms of the securities. Declines inRealized gains and losses on the fair valuesale of available-for-sale investment securities below their cost that are deemed to be other than temporarydetermined using the specific identification method.

Investment securities are reflected in earnings as realized losses.reviewed quarterly for possible other-than-temporary impairment (“OTTI”). In determining whether an other-than-temporary impairment (OTTI) losses exist,exists for debt securities, management must assert that: (a) it does not have the intent to sell the security; and (b) it is more likely than not it will not have to sell the security before recovery of its cost basis. If these conditions are not met, the Corporation must recognize an other-than-temporary impairment charge through earnings for the difference between the debt security’s amortized cost basis and its fair value, and such amount is included in noninterest income. For debt securities that do not meet the above criteria, and the Corporation does not expect to recover the security’s amortized cost basis, the security is considered other-than-temporarily impaired. For these debt securities, the Corporation separates the total impairment into the credit risk loss component and the amount of the loss related to market and other risk factors. In order to determine the amount of the credit loss for a debt security, the Corporation calculates the recovery value by performing a discounted cash flow analysis based on the current cash flows and future cash flows management expects to recover. The amount of the total other-than-temporary impairment related to the credit risk is recognized in earnings and is included in noninterest income. The amount of the total other-than-temporary impairment related to other risk factors is recognized as a component of other comprehensive income. For debt securities that have recognized an other-than-temporary impairment through earnings, if through subsequent evaluation there is a significant increase in the cash flow expected, the difference between the amortized cost basis and the cash flows expected to be collected is accreted as interest income.

Available-for-sale equity securities are reviewed for other-than-temporary impairment at each reporting date. This evaluation considers (1)a number of factors including, but not limited to, the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than cost, (2) the financial condition and near-termnear term prospects of the issuer, and (3)management’s ability and intent to hold the positivesecurities until fair value recovers. If it is determined that management does not have the ability and intent to hold the securities until recovery or that there are conditions that indicate that a security may not recover in value then the difference between the fair value and abilitythe cost of the Corporation to retain its investmentsecurity is recognized in the issuerearnings and is included in noninterest income. No such losses for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recoverydebt or equity securities were recognized in fair value (see Note 4). Realized gains and losses on the sale of securities are recorded on the trade date and are determined using the specific identification method.

2011, 2010, or 2009.

Loans:LOANS:

Loans that management has the intent and ability to hold for the foreseeable future or until maturity or payoff are reported at their outstanding principal balance adjusted for any charge offs,charge-offs, the allowance for loans losses, and any deferred fees or costs on originated loans. Interest income on loans is accrued over the term of the loan based on the principal amount outstanding. Loan origination fees and certain direct loan origination costs are capitalized and recognized as a component of interest income over the term of the loan using the constantlevel yield method.

The accrual of interest on mortgageagricultural, commercial and commercialmortgage loans is discontinued at the time the loan is 90 days or more past due unless the credit is well-securedwell secured and in the process of collection. Credit card loans and other personalConsumer loans are typically charged off no later than 180 days past due. Past due status is based on contractual terms of the loan. In all cases, loans are placed on nonaccrual or charged off at an earlier date if collection of principal or interest is considered doubtful.


27


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
For loans that are placed on non-accrual status or charged-off,charged off, all interest accrued in the current calendar year, but not collected, is reversed against interest income while interest accrued in prior calendar years, but not collected is charged against the allowance for loan losses. The interest on these loans is accounted for on the cash-basis, or cost-recovery method, until qualifying for return to accrual status. Loans are returned to accrual status when all principal and interest amounts contractually due are brought current and future payments are reasonably assured. For impaired loans not classified as nonaccrual, interest income continues to be accrued over the term of the loan based on the principal amount outstanding.

Allowance for Loan Losses:ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES:

The allowance for loan losses is established as losses are estimated to have occurred through a provision for loan losses charged to earnings. Loan losses are charged against the allowance when management believes the uncollectibility of the loan balance is confirmed. Subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the allowance.

The allowance for loan losses is evaluated on a regular basis by management and is based upon management’s periodic review of the collectibility of the loans in light of historical experience, the nature and volume of the loan portfolio, adverse situations that may affect the borrower’s ability to repay, estimated value of any underlying collateral and prevailing economic conditions. This evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires estimates that are susceptible to significant revision as more information becomes available.

The allowance consists of specific, general and unallocated components. The specific component relates to loans that are classified as either doubtful, substandard or special mention.deemed to be impaired. For such loans that are also classified as impaired,analyzed for specific allowance allocations, an allowance is established when the discounted cash flows (oror collateral value or observable market price)price of the impaired loan is lower than the carrying value of that loan. The general component covers non-classifiednon classified loans and is based on historical loss experience. An unallocated component is maintained to cover uncertainties that management believes affect its estimate of probable losses based on qualitative factors. The unallocated component of the allowance reflects the margin of imprecision inherent in the underlying assumptions used in the methodologies for estimating specific and general losses in the portfolio.

A

Loans may be classified as impaired if they meet one or more of the following criteria:

1.  There has been a chargeoff of its principal balance;

2.  The loan has been classified as a troubled debt restructuring; or

3.  The loan is considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Bank will be unable to collect the scheduled payments of principal or interest when due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Factors considered by management in determining impairment include payment status, collateral value, and the probability of collecting scheduled principal and interest payments when due. Loans that experience insignificant payment delays and payment shortfalls generally are not classified as impaired. Management determines the significance of payment delays and payment shortfalls on acase-by-case basis, taking into consideration all of the circumstance surrounding the loan and the borrower, including the length of the delay, the reason for the delay, the borrower’s prior payment record, and the amount of the shortfall in relation to the principal and interest owed. nonaccrual status.

Impairment is measured on a loan by loan basis for commercialagricultural and commercial real estate loans by either the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, the loan’s obtainable market price, or the fair value of the collateral, less cost to sell, if the loan is collateral dependent.

Large groups of smaller balance homogeneous loans are collectively evaluated for impairment. Accordingly, the Corporation does not separately identify individual consumer and residential loans for impairment disclosures.

Loans Held for Sale:LOANS HELD FOR SALE:

Mortgage loans originated and intended for sale in the secondary market are carried at the lower of cost or fair value as determined by aggregating outstanding commitments from investors or current investor yield requirements. Net unrealized losses, if any, are recognized through a valuation allowance by charges toof which the provision is accounted for in other noninterest expenses in the consolidated statements of income.

Mortgage loans held for sale can beare sold with the mortgage servicing rights retained by the Bank or sold to the investor.Corporation. The carrying value of mortgage loans sold is reduced by the cost allocated to the associated mortgage servicing rights. Gains or losses on sales of mortgage loans are recognized based on the difference between the selling price and the carrying value of the related mortgage loans sold.


28


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATEDTRANSFERS OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)ASSETS:
Transfers of Financial Assets:
Transfers of financial assets, including held for sale mortgage loans as described above, and participation loans are accounted for as sales when control over the assets has been surrendered. Control over transferred assets is determined to be surrendered when 1) the assets have been legally isolated from the Bank,Corporation, 2) the transferee obtains the right (free of conditions that constrain it from taking advantage of the right) to pledge or exchange the transferred assets and 3) the BankCorporation does not maintain effective control over the transferred assets through an agreement to repurchase them before their maturity.
Other than servicing, the Corporation has no substantive continuing involvement related to these loans.

Servicing:SERVICING:

Servicing assets are recognized as separate assets when rights are acquired through purchase or through sale of financial assets. The Corporation has no purchased servicing rights. For sales of mortgage loans, a portion of the cost of originating the loan is allocated to the servicing right based on relative fair value. Fair value is based on market prices for comparable mortgage servicing contracts, when available, or alternatively, is based on a valuation model that calculates the present value of estimated future net servicing income. The valuation model incorporates assumptions that market participants would use in estimating future net servicing income, such as the cost to service, the discount rate, the custodial earnings rate, an inflation rate, ancillary income, prepayment speeds and default rates and losses.

Servicing assets are evaluated for impairment based upon the fair value of the rights as compared to amortized cost. Impairment is determined by stratifying rights into tranches based on predominant risk characteristics, such as interest rate, loan type, and investor type. Impairment is recognized through a valuation allowance for an individual tranche, to the extent that fair value is less than the capitalized amount for the tranche. If the Corporation later determines that all or a portion of the impairment no longer exists for a particular tranche, a reduction of the valuation allowance may be recorded as an increase to income. Capitalized servicing rights are reported in other assets and are amortized into non-interestnoninterest income in proportion to, and over the period of, the estimated future net servicing income of the underlying financial assets.

The unpaid principal balance of mortgages serviced for others was $304,626 and $309,882 with capitalized servicing rights of $2,374 and $2,667 at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

Servicing fee income is recorded for fees earned for servicing loans for others. The fees are based on a contractual percentage of the outstanding principal; or a fixed amount per loan and are recorded as income when earned. The amortization of mortgage servicing rights is netted against loanCorporation recorded servicing fee income, a componentrevenue of noninterest$732, $760, and $724 related to residential mortgage loans serviced for others during 2011, 2010, and 2009, respectively and is included in other non interest income.

Loans Acquired Through Transfer:LOANS ACQUIRED THROUGH TRANSFER:

American Institute of Certified Public Accountants’ Statement of Position (SOP)03-3    Authoritative accounting guidance related to acquired loans requires that a valuation allowance for loans acquired in a transfer, including in a business combination, reflect only losses incurred after acquisition, and should not be recorded at acquisition. ItThis standard applies to any loan acquired in a transfer that shows evidence of credit quality deterioration since it was originated. The effect on results of operations and financial position of the Corporation’s acquisition of the allowance for loan losses carried over from Farwell State Savings Bank (“Farwell”) (see Note 2) was not material in 2006 due to the limited number of troubled loans held by Farwell. Included in the fair value adjustments of nonintangible net assets acquired from Greenville Community Financial Corporation (GCFC), was a reduction in the allowance for loan losses of $437. The $437 represented the identified impairments in GCFC’s loan portfolio as of December 31, 2007 (see Note 2).

Foreclosed Assets:FORECLOSED ASSETS:

Assets acquired through, or in lieu, of loan foreclosure are held for sale and are initially recorded at the lower of the Bank’sCorporation’s carrying amount or fair value less estimated selling costs at the date of transfer, establishing a new cost basis. Any write-downswrite downs based on the asset’s fair value at the date of acquisition are charged to the allowance for loan losses. After foreclosure, property held for sale is carried at the lower of the new cost basis or fair value less costs to sell. Impairment losses on property to be held and used are measured at the amount by which the carrying amount of property exceeds its fair value. Costs relating to holding these assets are expensed as incurred. Valuations are


29


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
periodically performed by management, and any subsequent write-downs are recorded as a charge to operations, if necessary, to reduce the carrying value of a property to the lower of the Bank’sCorporation’s carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell. Foreclosed assets of $2,923$1,876 and $1,376$2,067 as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively, are included in Other Assets on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets at December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
sheets.

Off-Balance-Sheet Credit Related Financial Instruments:PREMISES AND EQUIPMENT:

In the ordinary course of business, the Corporation has entered into commitments to extend credit, including commitments under credit card arrangements, home equity lines of credit, commercial letters of credit, and standby letters of credit. Such financial instruments are recorded only when funded.
Premises and Equipment:
Land is carried at cost. Buildings and equipment are carried at cost, less accumulated depreciation. Depreciationdepreciation which is computed principally by the straight linestraight-line method based upon the estimated useful lives of the related assets, which range from 3 to 40 years. Major improvements are capitalized and appropriately amortized based upon the useful lives of the related assets which generally range from 5 to 30 years.or the expected terms of the leases,

if shorter, using the straight-line method. Maintenance, repairs and minor alterations are charged to current operations as expenditures occuroccur. Management annually reviews these assets to determine whether carrying values have been impaired.

FDIC INSURANCE PREMIUM:    In 2009, the Corporation was required to prepay quarterly FDIC risk-based assessments for the fourth quarter of 2009 and major improvements are capitalized.

each of the quarters in the years ending December 31, 2010, 2011 and 2012. The assessments for 2010 through 2012, which had a carrying balance of $2,588 and $3,586 as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively, have been recorded as a prepaid asset in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets in Other Assets, and will be expensed on a ratable basis quarterly through December 31, 2012.

Equity Securities Without Readily Determinable Fair Values:EQUITY SECURITIES WITHOUT READILY DETERMINABLE FAIR VALUES:    

Included in equity securities without readily determinable fair values are restricted securities, of $9,340 in 2008 and $6,253 in 2007. Restricted securities include stock of the Federal Reserve Bank and the Federal Home Loan Bank, which are carried at cost, and have no contractual maturity. Also includedinvestments in nonconsolidated entities accounted for under the equity method of accounting.

Equity securities without readily determinable fair values consist of the following as of December 31:

   2011   2010 

Federal Home Loan Bank Stock

  $7,380    $7,596  

Investment in Corporate Settlement Solutions

   6,611     6,793  

Federal Reserve Bank Stock

   1,879     1,879  

Investment in Valley Financial Corporation

   1,000     1,000  

Other

   319     296  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $17,189    $17,564  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN:    At December 31, 2008 is2011, the Corporation’s investmentIsabella Bank Corporation and Related Companies Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors (the “Directors Plan”) had 218,023 shares eligible to be issued to participants, for which an associated grantor trust (Rabbi Trust) held 16,585 shares. The Corporation had 224,663 shares to be issued in CT/IBT Title Agency, LLC, which was $6,905 at that date (see Note 2 — “Business Combinations and Joint Venture Formation”).

Stock2010, with 32,686 shares held in the Rabbi Trust. Compensation Plans:
In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS) No. 123(revised 2004),Share-Based Payment, compensation costs relating to share-basedshare based payment transactions are recognized in the consolidated financial statements andas the services are rendered, with the cost is measured based on the fair value of the equity or liability instruments issued. SFAS No. 123(R) covers a wide range ofissued (see “Equity Compensation Plan” in Note 17.) The Corporation has no other share-based compensation arrangements including stock options, restricted share plans, performance-based awards, share appreciation rights, and employee share purchase plans. Compensation expense is based on the fair value of the awards, which is generally the market price of the stock on the measurement date and is recognized ratably over the service period of the award, which is usually the vesting period.
SFAS 123(R) applies to new awards and awards modified, repurchased, or cancelled after January 1, 2006. Compensation cost related to the non-vested portion of the awards outstanding as of December 31, 2005 was based on the grant date fair value of those awards as calculated under the original provisions of SFAS No. 123; that is, the Corporation was not required to re-measure the grant date fair value estimate of the unvested portion of awards granted prior to the effective date of SFAS No. 123(R).

Corporate Owned Life Insurance:CORPORATE OWNED LIFE INSURANCE:    

The Corporation has purchased life insurance policies on key members of management. In the event of death of one of these individuals, the Corporation would receive a specified cash payment equal to the face value of the policy. Such policies are recorded at their cash surrender value, or the amount that can be realized on the balance sheet dates. Increases in cash surrender value in excess of single premiums paid are reported as other noninterest income.
Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) IssueNo. 06-4,Other Noninterest Income.Accounting for Deferred Compensation and Postretirement Benefit Aspects of Endorsement Split-Dollar Life Insurance Arrangements,ratified by the FASB in September, 2006, requires that policyholders recognize a liability for any postretirement benefits provided through


30


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
the Corporation’s program. As of December 31, 2008,2011 and 2010, the present value of the nature and amount of post retirement benefits promisedpayable by the Corporation to the covered employees iswas estimated to be $2,460.$2,633 and $2,573, respectively, and is included in Accrued Interest Payable and Other Liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets. The periodic policy maintenance costs were $85$60 and $68 for 2008.
Acquisition Intangibles2011 and Goodwill:2010, respectively.

ACQUISITION INTANGIBLES AND GOODWILL:

Isabella Bank    The Corporation previously acquired branch facilities and related deposits in business combinations accounted for as a purchase. During October 2006, Isabella Bank Corporation acquired Farwell State Savings Bank (“Farwell”) resulting in identified core deposit intangibles and goodwill (see Note 2). On January 1, 2008, Isabella Bank acquired Greenville Community Financial Corporation (“GCFC”) resulting in identified core deposit intangibles and goodwill (see Note 2). The acquisition of the branchesacquisitions included amounts related to the valuation of customer deposit relationships (core deposit intangibles). Such core deposit intangibles are included in other assets and are being amortized on the straight line basis over nine years. Core deposit intangibles arising from the acquisition of Farwellacquisitions are included in Other Assets and are being amortized over their estimated lives and evaluated for potential impairment on a 10 year sum-of-year’s digits amortization schedule. Core deposit intangibles arising from the acquisition of GCFC are being amortized on a 15 year sum-of-year’s digits amortization schedule.at least an annual basis. Goodwill, which is included in otherOther Assets, represents the excess of purchase price over identifiable assets, and is not amortized but is evaluated for impairment on at least annually, or on an interim basisannual basis. Goodwill is typically qualitatively evaluated to determine if an event occurs or circumstances change that wouldit is more likely than not reducethat the carrying balance is impaired. If it is determined that the carrying balance of goodwill is more likely than not to be impaired, management performs a cash flow valuation to determine the extent of the

potential impairment. Acquisition intangibles are tested for impairment with a cash flow valuation. This valuation method requires a significant degree of management judgment. In the event the projected undiscounted net operating cash flows for these intangible assets are less than the carrying value, the asset is recorded at fair value as determined by the valuation model.

OFF BALANCE SHEET CREDIT RELATED FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS:    In the ordinary course of business, the reporting unit below the carrying value.

Corporation has entered into commitments to extend credit, including commitments under credit card arrangements, home equity lines of credit, commercial letters of credit, and standby letters of credit. Such financial instruments are recorded only when funded.

Federal Income Taxes:FEDERAL INCOME TAXES:

Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are determined using the liability (or balance sheet) method. Under this method, the net deferred tax assets or liability is determined based on the tax effects of the temporary differences between the book and tax bases on the various balance sheet assets and liabilities and gives current recognition to changes in tax rates and laws.
Valuation allowances are established, where necessary, to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized. Income tax expense is the tax payable or refundable for the year plus or minus the change during the year in deferred tax assets and liabilities.

The Corporation analyzes its filing positions in the jurisdictions where it is required to file income tax returns, as well as all open tax years in these jurisdictions. The Corporation has also elected to retain its existing accounting policy with respect to the treatment of interest and penalties attributable to income taxes, and continues to reflect any charges for such, to the extent they arise, as a component of its noninterest expenses.

Advertising Costs:MARKETING COSTS:    

AdvertisingMarketing costs are expensed as incurred (see Note 11).

RECLASSIFICATIONS:    Certain amounts reported in the 2010 and 2009 consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to conform with the 2011 presentation.

Computation of Earnings Per Share:NOTE 2 — COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

Basic earnings per share represents income available to common stockholdersshareholders divided by the weighted-averageweighted average number of common shares issuedoutstanding during the period, which includes shares held in the Rabbi Trust controlled by the Corporation (see Note 17).period. Diluted earnings per share reflects additional common shares that would have been outstanding if dilutive potential common shares had been issued, as well as any adjustments to income that would result from the assumed issuance. Potential common shares that may be issued by the Corporation relate solely to outstanding shares in the Corporation’s Deferred Director fee plan (seeDirectors Plan, see Note 17).

17.

Earnings per common share have been computed based on the following:

             
  2008  2007  2006 
 
Average number of common shares issued*  7,492,677   6,973,508   6,269,465 
Effect of shares in the Deferred Director fee plan*  184,473   197,055   181,280 
             
Average number of common shares outstanding used to calculate diluted earnings per common share  7,677,150   7,170,563   6,450,745 
             
Net Income $4,101  $7,930  $7,001 
             
Earnings per share            
Basic $0.55  $1.14  $1.12 
             
Diluted $0.53  $1.11  $1.09 
             

   2011   2010   2009 

Average number of common shares outstanding for basic calculation

   7,572,841     7,541,676     7,517,276  

Average potential effect of shares in the Directors Plan(1)

   194,634     187,744     181,319  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Average number of common shares outstanding used to calculate diluted earnings per common share

   7,767,475     7,729,420     7,698,595  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net income

  $10,210    $9,045    $7,800  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Earnings per share

      

Basic

  $1.35    $1.20    $1.04  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Diluted

  $1.31    $1.17    $1.01  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

(1)
*As adjusted forExclusive of shares held in the 10% stock dividend paid February 29, 2008Rabbi Trust


31


NOTE 3 — ACCOUNTING STANDARDS UPDATES

Recently Adopted Accounting Standards Updates

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2010-06:“Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurement”
Reclassifications:
Certain amounts reported

In January 2010, ASU No. 2010-06 amended Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 820 “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures” to add new disclosures for: (1) significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements and the reasons for the transfers and (2) presenting separately information about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements for Level 3 fair value instruments (as opposed to reporting activity as net).

ASU No. 2010-06 also clarified existing disclosures by requiring reporting entities to provide fair value measurement disclosures for each class of assets and liabilities and to provide disclosures about the valuation techniques and inputs used to measure fair value for both recurring and nonrecurring fair value measurements.

The new authoritative guidance was effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2009 except for the disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements in the 2007rollforward of activity in Level 3 fair value measurements, which was effective for interim and 2006annual periods beginning after December 15, 2010. The new guidance did not have a significant impact on the Corporation’s consolidated financial statements have been reclassifiedstatements.

ASU No. 2011-01: “Deferral of the Effective Date of Disclosures about Troubled Debt Restructurings in Update No. 2010-20.”

In January 2011, ASU No. 2011-01 amended ASC Topic 310, “Receivables” to conformtemporarily delay the effective date of new disclosures related to troubled debt restructurings as required in ASU No. 2010-20, “Disclosures about the Credit Quality of Financing Receivables and the Allowance for Credit Losses”,which was initially intended to be effective for interim and annual periods ending after December 15, 2010. The effective date of the new disclosures about troubled debt restructurings was delayed to coordinate with the 2008 presentation.newly issued guidance for determining what constitutes a troubled debt restructuring (ASU No. 2011-02). The new disclosures were effective for interim and annual periods beginning on or after June 15, 2011 and increased the level of reporting disclosures related to troubled debt restructurings.

ASU No. 2011-02: “A Creditor’s Determination of Whether a Restructuring Is a Troubled Debt Restructuring.”

In April 2011, ASU No. 2011-02 amended ASC Topic 310, “Receivables” to clarify authoritative guidance as to what loan modifications constitute concessions, and would therefore be considered a troubled debt restructuring. Classification as a troubled debt restructuring will automatically classify such loans as impaired. ASU No. 2011-02 clarifies that:

If a debtor does not otherwise have access to funds at a market rate for debt with similar risk characteristics as the modified debt, the modification would be considered to be at a below-market rate, which may indicate that the creditor has granted a concession.

A modification that results in a temporary or permanent increase in the contractual interest rate cannot be presumed to be at a rate that is at or above a market rate and therefore could still be considered a concession.

A creditor must consider whether a borrower’s default is “probable” on any of its debt in the foreseeable future when assessing financial difficulty.

A modification that results in an insignificant delay in payments is not a concession.

In addition, ASU No. 2011-02 clarifies that a creditor is precluded from using the effective interest rate test in the debtor’s guidance on modification of payables (ASC Topic 470, “Debt”) when evaluating whether a modification constitutes a troubled debt restructuring. The new authoritative guidance was effective for interim

and annual periods beginning on or after June 15, 2011 and increased the volume of loans that the Corporation classified as troubled debt restructurings and required additional disclosures (see Note 6 – Loans and Allowance for Loan Losses).

Recent Accounting Pronouncements:ASU No. 2011-08: “Testing Goodwill for Impairment

In September 2011, ASU No. 2011-08 amended ASC Topic 350, “Goodwill and Other” to simplify the testing of 2006, EITF IssueNo. 06-4,Accountinggoodwill impairments. This update will allow for Deferred Compensation and Postretirement Benefit Aspectsa qualitative assessment of Endorsement Split-Dollar Life Insurance Arrangements, was ratified bygoodwill to determine whether or not it is necessary to perform the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”). The EITF reached a consensus that for an endorsement split-dollar life insurance arrangement withintwo-step impairment test described in ASC Topic 350. While the scope of this Issue, an employer should recognize a liability for future benefits. The Corporation has purchased corporation-owned life insurance on certain of its employees. The cash surrender value of these policies is carried as an asset on the consolidated balance sheets. These life insurance policies are generally subject to endorsement split-dollar life insurance arrangements. These arrangements were designed to provide a pre-and postretirement benefit for senior officers of the Corporation. The Corporation adopted EITF IssueNo. 06-4 effective January 1, 2008 and as a result recorded an initial liability of $2,375. To establish this liability, the Corporation recorded a one time charge of $1,571, net of tax, directly to retained earnings at that date.

On March 19, 2008, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 161 (SFAS No. 161)Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.The objective of SFAS No. 161 is to enhance disclosures about an entity’s derivative and hedging activities and thereby improve the transparency of financial reporting. SFAS No. 161new authoritative guidance is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011, the Corporation elected to early adopt the guidance as of December 31, 2011. The new guidance did not have any impact on the Corporation’s consolidated financial statements.

Pending Accounting Standards Updates

ASU No. 2011-03: “Reconsideration of Effective Control for Repurchase Agreements

In April 2011, ASU No. 2011-03 amended ASC Topic 310, “Transfers and Servicing” to eliminate from the assessment of effective control, the criteria calling for the transferor to have the ability to repurchase or redeem the financial assets on substantially the agreed upon terms, even in the event of the transferee’s default. The assessment of effective control should instead focus on the transferor’s contractual rights and obligations. The new authoritative guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning on or after NovemberDecember 15, 20082011 and is not expected to impact the Corporation’s consolidated financial statements.

ASU No. 2011-04: “Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRS

In May 2011, ASU No. 2011-04 amended ASC Topic 820, “Fair Value Measurement” to align fair value measurements and disclosures in U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) and International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). The ASU changes the wording used to describe the requirements in GAAP for measuring fair value and disclosures about fair value.

The ASU clarifies the application of existing fair value measurements and disclosure requirements related to:

The application of highest and best use and valuation premise concepts.

Measuring the fair value of an instrument classified in a reporting entity’s stockholders’ equity.

Disclosure about fair value measurements within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.

The ASU also changes particular principles or requirements for measuring fair value and disclosing information measuring fair value and disclosures related to:

Measuring the fair value of financial instruments that are managed within a portfolio.

Application of premiums and discounts in a fair value measurement.

The new authoritative guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning on or after December 15, 2011 and is not expected to have a significant impact on the Corporation’s consolidated financial statements.

ASU No. 2011-05: “Presentation of Comprehensive Income

In May 2008,June 2011, ASU No. 2011-05 amended ASC Topic 220, “Comprehensive Income” to improve the comparability, consistency, and transparency of financial reporting and to increase the prominence of items reported in other comprehensive income. In addition, to increase the prominence of items reported in other comprehensive income, and to facilitate the convergence of GAAP and IFRS, the FASB issued Statementeliminated the option to present components of Financial Accounting Standards No. 162 (SFAS No. 162)other comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in shareholders’ equity.

The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. The objective of SFAS No. 162 is to identify the sources of accounting principles and the framework for selecting the principles to be used in the preparation of financial statements of nongovernmental entities that are presented in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) in the United States (the GAAP hierarchy). SFAS No. 162new authoritative guidance is effective 60 days following the SEC’s approval of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board amendments to AU Section 411, The Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity With Generally Accepted Accounting Principlesfor interim and annual periods beginning on or after December 15, 2011 and is not expected to have a significant impact on the Corporation’s consolidated financial statements.

In October 2008, the FASB staff issued Staff PositionNo. FSP 157-3,Determining the Fair Value of a Financial Asset When the Market for That Asset is Not Active.FSP 157-3 clarifies the application of SFAS 157, whichstatements since the Corporation adopted as of January 1, 2007, in cases where a market is not active. The Corporation has considered the guidance provided byFSP 157-3, which was effective on October 10, 2008, in its determination of estimated fair values as of December 31, 2008.
In December 2008 the FASB issued FSP No. 132(R)-1Employers’ Disclosures about Postretirement Benefit Plan Assets. FSP 132(R)-1 provides guidance related to an employer’s disclosures about plan assets of defined benefit pension or other post- retirement benefit plans. Under FSP 132(R)-1, disclosures should provide users of financial statements with an understanding of how investment allocation decisions are made, the factors that are pertinent to an understanding of investment policies and strategies, the major categories of plan assets, the inputs and valuation techniques used to measure the fair value of plan assets, the effect of fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs on changes in plan assets for the period and significant concentrations of risk within plan assets. The disclosures required by FSP 132(R)-1 will be included in the Corporation’s financial statements beginning with the financial statements for the year-ended December 31, 2009.
On January 12, 2009 EITF Issue99-20-1,Amendments to the Impairment Guidance of EIFT IssueNo. 99-20 Recognition of Interest Income and Impairment on Purchased Beneficial Interests and Beneficial Interests That Continue to be Held by a Transferor in Securitized Financial Assets was ratified by the FASB. The FSP retains and emphasizes the objective of an other-than-temporary impairment assessment and the related disclosure


32


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
requirements in FASB Statement No. 115,Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities,and other related guidance. EITF Issue99-20-1 is not expected to have a significant impact on the Corporation’s consolidated financial statements.
The FASB Issued EITFNo. 03-6-1,Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securitiesin June 2008. FSPEITF 03-6-1 provides that unvested share-based payment awards that contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents (whether paid or unpaid) are participating securities and shall be included in the computation of earnings per share pursuant to the two-class method. FSPEITF 03-6-1 will be effective on January 1, 2009. All previously reported earnings per share data will be retrospectively adjusted to conform with the provisions of FSPEITF 03-6-1. FSPEITF 03-6-1 is not expected to have a significant impact on the Corporation’s consolidated financial statements.
Note 2 — Business Combinations and Joint Venture Formation
Farwell State Savings Bank
On October 3, 2006, Isabella Bank (the “Bank”) acquired 100 percent of Farwell State Savings Bank (Farwell). As a result of this acquisition, Farwell merged with and into the Bank. Under the terms of the merger agreement, each share of Farwell common stock was automatically converted into the right to receive 3.0382 shares of Isabella Bank Corporation common stock and $29.00 in cash. As a result of this acquisition, the Corporation issued 797,475 shares of Isabella Bank Corporation common stock valued at $30,448 and paid a total of $7,612 in cash to Farwell shareholders. Included in the purchase price was $382 of transaction costs. The total consideration exchanged including the value of the common stock issued, cash paid to shareholders, plus cash paid for transaction costs resulted in a total purchase cost of $38,442. The acquisition of Farwell has increased the overall market share for Isabella Bank Corporation in furtherance of the Bank’s strategic plan.
The following table summarizes the estimated fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the date of the acquisition.
             
     Fair Value
    
     Adjustments of
    
  Farwell
  Nonintangible
  Fair Value
 
  October 3,
  Net Assets
  of Net Assets
 
  2006  Acquired  Acquired 
 
ASSETS
            
Cash and cash equivelants $5,281  $  $5,281 
Securities available for sale  17,166      17,166 
Loans, net  63,874   (470)  63,404 
Bank premises and equipment  307   600   907 
Other assets  2,416   15   2,431 
             
Total assets acquired
  89,044   145   89,189 
             
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
            
Liabilities
            
Deposits  73,731   (393)  73,338 
Accrued interest and other liabilities  1,114      1,114 
             
Total liabilities assumed
  74,845   (393)  74,452 
             
Net assets acquired
 $14,199  $538   14,737 
             
Core deposit intangible          1,442 
Goodwill          22,263 
             
Total consideration paid
         $38,442 
             


33


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
The fair value adjustments are being amortized over two years using the straight line amortization method. The core deposit intangible is being amortized using a 10 year sum-of-the-years’ digits amortization schedule. Goodwill, which is not amortized, is tested for impairment at least annually. As the acquisition was considered a stock transaction, goodwill is not deductible for federal income tax purposes.
The consolidated statements of income include operating results of Farwell since the date of acquisition.
The unaudited pro forma information presented in the following table has been prepared based on Isabella Bank Corporation’s historical results combined with Farwell. The information has been combinedalways elected to present the resultsa separate statement of operations as if the acquisition had occurred at the beginning of the periods presented. The pro forma results are not necessarily indicative of the results which would have actually been attained if the acquisition had been consummated in the past or what may be attained in the future and have not been adjusted for the 10% stock dividend paid February 29, 2008:
     
  Year Ended
 
  December 31
 
  2006 
 
Net interest income $27,499 
     
Net income $8,023 
     
Basic earnings per share $1.41 
     
Greenville Community Financial Corporation
Effective on the opening of business on January 1, 2008, Isabella Bank Corporation acquired 100 percent of Greenville Community Financial Corporation (GCFC). As a result of this acquisition, Greenville Community Bank, a wholly owned subsidiary of GCFC, merged with and into the Bank. Under the terms of the merger agreement, each share of GCFC common stock was automatically converted into the right to receive 0.6659 shares of Isabella Bank Corporation common stock and $14.70 per share in cash. Exclusive of the effects of the 10% stock dividend paid February 29, 2008, the Corporation issued 514,809 shares of Isabella Bank Corporation common stock valued at $22,652 and paid a total of $11,365 in cash to GCFC shareholders. The total consideration exchanged including the value of the common stock issued, cash paid to shareholders, plus cash paid for $564 in transaction costs resulted in a total purchase price of $34,581. The purchase price was determined using the latest Isabella Bank Corporation stock transaction price known to management as of November 27, 2007, the date of the merger agreement. The acquisition of Greenville has increased the overall market share for Isabella Bank Corporation in furtherance of the Bank’s strategic plan.


34comprehensive income.


NOTE 4 — TRADING SECURITIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
The following table summarizes the estimate of the total purchase price of the transaction as well as adjustments to allocate the purchase price based on the preliminary estimates of fair values of the assets and liabilities of GCFC.
             
     Fair Value
    
     Adjustments of
    
  Greenville
  Nonintangible
  Fair Value
 
  January 1,
  Net Assets
  of Net Assets
 
  2008  Acquired  Acquired 
 
ASSETS
            
Cash and cash equivalents $2,339  $  $2,339 
Federal funds sold  125      125 
Trading securities  4,979      4,979 
Securities available for sale  7,007      7,007 
Loans, net  88,613   (398)  88,215 
Bank premises and equipment  2,054   194   2,248 
Other assets  2,870      2,870 
             
Total assets acquired
  107,987   (204)  107,783 
             
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
            
Liabilities
            
Deposits  90,151   (102)  90,049 
Other borrowed funds  5,625   181   5,806 
Accrued interest and other liabilities  146      146 
             
Total liabilities assumed
  95,922   79   96,001 
             
Net assets acquired
 $12,065  $(283)  11,782 
             
Core deposit intangible          1,480 
Goodwill          21,319 
             
Total consideration paid
         $34,581 
             
The fair value adjustments of tangible net assets acquired are being amortized over two years using the straight line amortization method. The core deposit intangible is being amortized using a 15 year sum-of-the-years’ digits amortization schedule. Goodwill, which is not amortized, is tested for impairment at least annually. As the acquisition was considered a stock transaction, goodwill is not deductible for federal income tax purposes.
The 2008 consolidated statements of income include the operating results of GCFC for the entire year.
The unaudited pro forma information presented in the following table has been prepared based on Isabella Bank Corporation’s historical results combined with GCFC. The information has been combined to present the results of operations as if the acquisition had occurred at the beginning of the earliest period presented. The pro forma results are not necessarily indicative of the results which would have actually been attained if the acquisition had been consummated in the past or what may be attained in the future:
         
  Year Ended December 31 
  2007  2006 
 
Net interest income $31,579  $28,817 
         
Net income $8,631  $7,992 
         
Basic earnings per share* $1.10  $1.12 
         
*As adjusted for the 10% stock dividend paid February 29, 2008.


35


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Title Company Joint Venture Formation
On March 1, 2008, IBT Title and Insurance Agency, Inc. (IBT Title), a wholly owned subsidiary of Isabella Bank Corporation, merged its assets and liabilities with Corporate Title Agency, LLC (“Corporate Title”), a third-party title business based in Traverse City, Michigan, to form CT/IBT Title Agency, LLC. As a result of this transaction, the Corporation became a 50 percent joint venture owner in CT/IBT Title Agency, LLC. The purpose of this joint venture is to help IBT Title and Insurance Agency, Inc. expand its service area and to take advantage of economies of scale. As the Corporation is a 50 percent owner of this new entity, revenues and expenses will now be recorded under the equity method and, as such, our share of the net income or loss from the joint venture will be included in other noninterest income. As of December 31, 2008, the Corporation had a recorded investment of $6,905 in the new entity, which is included in equity securities without readily determinable fair values. The following table summarizes the condensed balance sheet of IBT Title as of March 1, 2008. These amounts were excluded from the balance sheet detail of the Corporation and are now included in investment in equity securities without readily determinable fair values.
     
  IBT Title
 
  March 1,
 
  2008 
 
ASSETS
    
Cash and cash equivalents $4,542 
Premises and equipment  2,352 
Other assets, including intangibles of $1,590  2,339 
     
Total assets
  9,233 
     
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
    
Liabilities
    
Escrow funds $1,866 
Other liabilities  194 
     
Total liabilities
  2,060 
Total equity
  7,173 
     
Total liabilities & equity
 $9,233 
     
The assets of the joint venture as of December 31, 2008 were $12,834. The total liabilities of the joint venture were $1,287 and the equity was $11,547 as of December 31, 2008. The Corporation’s share of the joint venture’s operating results for the ten-months ended December 31, 2008 was not significant.
Note 3 — Trading Securities
Trading securities, at fair value, consist of the following investments at December 31:
         
  2008  2007 
 
Government-sponsored enterprises $4,014  $4,024 
States and political subdivisions  11,556   10,324 
Corporate obligations  160   1,004 
Mortgage-backed  6,045   9,712 
         
Total trading securities
 $21,775  $25,064 
         


36


   2011   2010 

States and political subdivisions

  $4,710    $5,837  

Included in the net trading losses of $78 during 2011, were $60 of net trading losses on securities that relate to the Corporation’s trading portfolio as of December 31, 2011. Included in net trading gains of $94 during 2010, were $74 of net trading gains on securities that relate to the Corporation’s trading portfolio as of December 31, 2010.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSNOTE 5(Continued)
Note 4 —AVAILABLE-FOR-SALE INVESTMENT SECURITIES

The amortized cost and fair value of available-for-sale investment securities, available for sale, with gross unrealized gains and losses, are as follows as of December 31:

                 
  2008 
     Gross
  Gross
    
  Amortized
  Unrealized
  Unrealized
  Fair
 
  Cost  Gains  Losses  Value 
 
Securities Available-for-Sale                
U.S. Government and federal agencies $3,999  $84  $  $4,083 
Government-sponsored enterprises  61,919   1,070   1   62,988 
States and political subdivisions  148,186   1,808   671   149,323 
Corporate  7,145         7,145 
Money market preferred  11,000      5,021   5,979 
Mortgage-backed  16,492   445      16,937 
                 
Total
 $248,741  $3,407  $5,693  $246,455 
                 
                 
  2007 
     Gross
  Gross
    
  Amortized
  Unrealized
  Unrealized
  Fair
 
  Cost  Gains  Losses  Value 
 
Securities Available-for-Sale                
U.S. Government and federal agencies $3,983  $75  $  $4,058 
Government-sponsored enterprises  49,631   556   6   50,181 
States and political subdivisions  130,772   611   427   130,956 
Corporate  12,000         12,000 
Money market preferred  12,300         12,300 
Mortgage-backed  3,599   33      3,632 
                 
Total
 $212,285  $1,275  $433  $213,127 
                 
The Corporation had pledged investments in the following amounts as of December 31:
         
  2008  2007 
 
Pledged for public deposits and for other purposes necessary or requried by law $18,000  $26,289 
Pledged to secure repurchase agreements  64,876   16,072 
         
Total
 $82,876  $42,361 
         


37


   2011 
       Gross   Gross     
   Amortized   Unrealized   Unrealized   Fair 
   Cost   Gains   Losses   Value 

Government sponsored enterprises

  $395    $2    $    $397  

States and political subdivisions

   166,832     8,157     51     174,938  

Auction rate money market preferred

   3,200          1,151     2,049  

Preferred stocks

   6,800          1,767     5,033  

Mortgage-backed securities

   140,842     2,807     47     143,602  

Collateralized mortgage obligations

   96,545     2,556          99,101  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $414,614    $13,522    $3,016    $425,120  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

   2010 
       Gross   Gross     
   Amortized   Unrealized   Unrealized   Fair 
   Cost   Gains   Losses   Value 

Government sponsored enterprises

  $5,394    $10    $    $5,404  

States and political subdivisions

   167,328     3,349     960     169,717  

Auction rate money market preferred

   3,200          335     2,865  

Preferred stocks

   7,800          864     6,936  

Mortgage-backed securities

   101,096     1,633     514     102,215  

Collateralized mortgage obligations

   44,617     103     1,133     43,587  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $329,435    $5,095    $3,806    $330,724  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
The amortized cost and fair value of available-for-sale securities by contractual maturity at December 31, 20082011 are as follows:
         
  Available for Sale 
  Amortized
  Fair
 
  Cost  Value 
 
Within 1 year $32,057  $27,163 
Over 1 year through 5 years  73,531   74,888 
After 5 years through 10 years  79,159   80,158 
Over 10 years  47,502   47,309 
         
   232,249   229,518 
Mortgage-backed securities  16,492   16,937 
         
  $248,741  $246,455 
         

   Maturing   

Securities

With

Variable

Monthly

Payments

or

     
       After One   After Five           
   Due in   Year But   Years But       Continual     
   One Year   Within   Within   After   Call     
   or Less   Five Years   Ten Years   Ten Years   Dates   Total 

Government sponsored enterprises

  $    $    $395    $    $    $395  

States and political subdivisions

   8,381     34,610     87,436     36,405          166,832  

Auction rate money market preferred

                       3,200     3,200  

Preferred stocks

                       6,800     6,800  

Mortgage-backed securities

                       140,842     140,842  

Collateralized mortgage obligations

                       96,545     96,545  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total amortized cost

  $8,381    $34,610    $87,831    $36,405    $247,387    $414,614  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Fair value

  $8,441    $35,904    $93,586    $37,404    $249,785    $425,120  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Expected maturities for government sponsored enterprises and states and political subdivisions may differ from contractual maturities because issuers may have the right to call or prepay obligations.

Because of their variable payments, mortgage-backed securities

As auction rate money market preferreds and preferred stocks have continual call dates, they are not reported by a specific maturity group.

Because of their variable monthly payments, mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations are not reported by a specific maturity group.

A summary of the activity related to the sale of available-for-sale debt securities is as follows during the years ended December 31:

             
  2008  2007  2006 
 
Proceeds from sales of securities $6,096  $5,396  $15,257 
             
Gross realized gains $24  $12  $ 
Gross realized losses     (31)  (112)
             
Net realized gains (losses) $24  $(19) $(112)
             
Applicable income tax (expense) benefit $(8) $6  $38 
             

   2011   2010  2009 

Proceeds from sales of securities

  $8,877    $18,303   $32,204  
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Gross realized gains

  $3    $351   $648  

Gross realized losses

        (3    
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net realized gains

  $3    $348   $648  
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Applicable income tax expense

  $1    $118   $220  
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

The cost basis used to determine the realized gains or losses of securities sold was the amortized cost of the individual investment security as of the trade date.

Information pertaining to available-for-sale securities with gross unrealized losses at December 31 aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in continuous loss position, follows:

                     
  December 31, 2008 
  Less Than Twelve Months  Over Twelve Months    
  Gross
     Gross
     Total
 
  Unrealized
  Fair
  Unrealized
  Fair
  Unrealized
 
  Losses  Value  Losses  Value  Losses 
 
Securities Available-for-Sale                    
Government-sponsored enterprises $1  $999  $  $  $1 
States and political subdivisions  620   27,015   51   2,705   671 
Money market preferred  5,021   5,979         5,021 
                     
Total securities available-for-sale
 $5,642  $33,993  $51  $2,705  $5,693 
                     


38


   2011 
   Less Than Twelve Months   Over Twelve Months     
   Gross       Gross       Total 
   Unrealized   Fair   Unrealized   Fair   Unrealized 
   Losses   Value   Losses   Value   Losses 

States and political subdivisions

  $51    $1,410    $    $    $51  

Auction rate money market preferred

             1,151     2,049     1,151  

Preferred stocks

             1,767     5,033     1,767  

Mortgage-backed securities

   47     24,291               47  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $98    $25,701    $2,918    $7,082    $3,016  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Number of securities in an unrealized loss position:

     6       6     12  
    

 

 

     

 

 

   

 

 

 

   2010 
   Less Than Twelve Months   Over Twelve Months     
   Gross       Gross       Total 
   Unrealized   Fair   Unrealized   Fair   Unrealized 
   Losses   Value   Losses   Value   Losses 

States and political subdivisions

  $960    $29,409    $    $    $960  

Auction rate money market preferred

             335     2,865     335  

Preferred stocks

             864     2,936     864  

Mortgage-backed securities

   514     38,734               514  

Collateralized mortgage obligations

   1,133     33,880               1,133  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $2,607    $102,023    $1,199    $5,801    $3,806  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Number of securities in an unrealized loss position:

     82       4     86  
    

 

 

     

 

 

   

 

 

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
                     
  December 31, 2007 
  Less Than Twelve Months  Over Twelve Months    
  Gross
     Gross
     Total
 
  Unrealized
  Fair
  Unrealized
  Fair
  Unrealized
 
  Losses  Value  Losses  Value  Losses 
 
Securities Available-for-Sale                    
Government-sponsored enterprises $6  $994  $  $  $6 
States and political subdivisions  276   32,309   151   17,065   427 
                     
Total securities available-for-sale
 $282  $33,303  $151  $17,065  $433 
                     
The unrealized losses in the Corporation’s municipal bond portfolio are largely due to the downgradingAs a result of the two largest bond insurers from AAA to AA in June 2008. These downgrades caused the market to demand higher returns on insured bonds, which has resulted in declines in the value of the Corporation’s municipal bond portfolio, as the majority of the portfolio is insured. Despite the significant declines in interest rates observed during the fourth quarter of 2008, the municipal bond portfolio has struggled to increase in value.
The Corporation has invested $11,000 inconditions associated with certain auction rate money market preferred investment security instruments, which are classified as available-for-sale securities, and reflected at estimated fair value. Due$7,800 of the Corporation’s initial investment of $11,000 converted to recent events and general uncertaintypreferred stocks with debt like characteristics in credit markets, these investments have become illiquid.
2009. Due to the current illiquiditylimited trading of these securities in 2009 and 2010, the fair values were estimated utilizingCorporation utilized a discounted cash flow analysis or other type of valuation adjustment methodology as ofto determine fair values on December 31, 2008. These analyses consider, among other factors, the collateral underlying the security investments,2010. This analysis considered the creditworthiness of the counterparty, the timing of expected future cash flows, estimatesthe current volume of trading activity, and recent trade prices. The discount rates used were determined by using the next timeinterest rates of similarly rated financial institution’s debt based on the security is expectedweighted average of a range of terms for corporate bond interest rates, which were obtained from published sources and ranged from 3.90% to 6.90% as of December 31, 2010. During 2011, the markets for these securities have a successful auction,normalized and established regular trading patterns. As such, the Corporation’s positive intentCorporation determined the fair value for these securities based on quoted prices for identical securities, or based on quoted prices for similar securities as of December 31, 2011.

As of December 31, 2011 and ability to hold such securities until credit markets improve. These securities were also compared, when possible, to other securities with similar characteristics.

Due to the lack of marketability of certain investments at this time,December 31, 2010, management conducted an analysis to determine whether all securities currently in an unrealized loss position, including auction rate money market preferred securities and preferred stocks, should be considered other-than-temporarily-impaired (OTTI)(“OTTI”). Such analyses included,considered, among other factors, the following criteria:

Has the value of the investment declined more than what is deemed to be reasonable based on a risk and maturity adjusted discount rate?

Is the investment credit rating below investment grade?

• Has the value of the investment declined more than 20% based on a risk and maturity adjusted discount rate?
• Is the investment credit rating below investment grade?
• Is it probable that the issuer will be unable to pay the amount when due?
• Does the Corporation have the ability and positive intent to hold the security until maturity?
• Has the duration of the investment been extended by more than 7 years?

Is it probable that the issuer will be unable to pay the amount when due?

Is it more likely than not that the Corporation will not have to sell the security before recovery of its cost basis?

Has the duration of the investment been extended?

As of December 31, 2011, the Corporation held an auction rate money market preferred security and preferred stocks which continued to be in an unrealized loss position as a result of the securities’ interest rates, as they are currently lower than the offering rates of securities with similar characteristics. Management has determined that any declines in the fair value of these securities are the result of changes in interest rates and not risks related to the underlying credit quality of the security. Additionally, none of these securities are deemed to be below investment grade, management does not intend to sell the securities in an unrealized loss position, and it is more likely than not that the Corporation will not have to sell the securities before recovery of their cost basis. As a result, the Corporation has not recognized an other-than-temporary impairment related to these declines in fair value.

Based on the Corporation’s analysis using the above criteria, and the fact that management has asserted that it does not have the intent to sell these securities in an unrealized loss position, and that it is more likely than not the Corporation haswill not have to sell the positive intent and ability to hold debt securities for the reasonably foreseeable future,before recovery of their cost basis, management does not believe that the values of these or any othersuch securities are other-than-temporarily impaired as of as of December 31, 20082011 or 2007.

39

2010.


NOTE 6 — LOANS AND ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES (ALLL)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Note 5 — Loans
The BankCorporation grants commercial, agricultural, consumerresidential, and residentialconsumer loans to customers situated primarily in Clare, Gratiot, Isabella, Gratiot, Mecosta, Southwestern Midland, Western Saginaw, Montcalm, and Southern ClareSaginaw counties in Michigan. The ability of the borrowers to honor their repayment obligations is often dependent upon the real estate, agricultural, light manufacturing, retail, gaming and tourism, higher education, and general economic conditions of this region. Substantially all of the consumer and residential mortgage loans are secured by various items of property, while commercial loans are secured primarily by real estate, business assets, and personal guarantees; a portion of loans are unsecured.
A summary

Loans that management has the intent and ability to hold in its portfolio are reported at their outstanding principal balance adjusted for any charge-offs, the allowance for loans losses, and any deferred fees or costs. Interest income on loans is accrued over the term of the major classificationsloan based on the principal amount outstanding. Loan origination fees and certain direct loan origination costs are capitalized and recognized as a component of interest income over the term of the loan using the level yield method.

The accrual of interest on agricultural, commercial and mortgage loans is typically discontinued at the time the loan is 90 days or more past due unless the credit is well-secured and in the process of collection. Consumer loans are typically charged off no later than 180 days past due. Past due status is based on contractual terms of the loan. In all cases, loans are placed on nonaccrual or charged off at an earlier date if collection of principal or interest is considered doubtful.

For loans that are placed on nonaccrual status or charged off, all interest accrued in the current calendar year, but not collected, is reversed against interest income while interest accrued in prior calendar years, but not collected, is charged against the allowance for loan losses. The interest on these loans is accounted for on the cash basis, until qualifying for return to accrual status. Loans are returned to accrual status after six months of continuous performance. For impaired loans not classified as nonaccrual, interest income continues to be accrued over the term of the loan based on the principal amount outstanding.

Commercial and agricultural loans include loans for commercial real estate, commercial operating loans, farmland and agricultural production, and state and political subdivisions. Repayment of these loans is often dependent upon the successful operation and management of a business; thus, these loans generally involve greater risk than other types of lending. The Corporation minimizes its risk by limiting the amount of loans to any one borrower to $12,500. Borrowers with credit needs of more than $12,500 are serviced through the use of loan participations with other commercial banks. Commercial and agricultural real estate loans generally require

loan-to-value limits of less than 80%. Depending upon the type of loan, past credit history, and current operating results, the Corporation may require the borrower to pledge accounts receivable, inventory, and property and equipment. Personal guarantees are generally required from the owners of closely held corporations, partnerships, and sole proprietorships. In addition, the Corporation requires annual financial statements, prepares cash flow analyses, and reviews credit reports as deemed necessary.

The Corporation offers adjustable rate mortgages, fixed rate balloon mortgages, construction loans, and fixed rate mortgage loans which typically have amortization periods up to a maximum of 30 years. Fixed rate loans with an amortization of greater than 15 years are generally sold upon origination to the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation. Fixed rate residential mortgage loans with an amortization of 15 years or less may be held in the Corporation’s portfolio, held for future sale, or sold upon origination. Factors used in determining when to sell these mortgages include management’s judgment about the direction of interest rates, the Corporation’s need for fixed rate assets in the management of its interest rate sensitivity, and overall loan demand.

Lending policies generally limit the maximum loan-to-value ratio on residential mortgages to 95% of the lower of the appraised value of the property or the purchase price, with the condition that private mortgage insurance is required on loans with loan to value ratios in excess of 80%. Substantially all loans upon origination have a loan to value ratio of less than 80%. Underwriting criteria for residential real estate loans include: evaluation of the borrower’s ability to make monthly payments, the value of the property securing the loan, ensuring the payment of principal, interest, taxes, and hazard insurance does not exceed 28% of a borrower’s gross income, all debt servicing does not exceed 36% of income, acceptable credit reports, verification of employment, income, and financial information. Appraisals are performed by independent appraisers and reviewed internally. All mortgage loan requests are reviewed by a mortgage loan committee or through a secondary market automated underwriting system; loans in excess of $400 require the approval of the Bank’s Internal Loan Committee, Board of Directors, or the Board of Director’s Loan Committee.

Consumer loans include automobile loans, secured and unsecured personal loans, and overdraft protection related loans. Loans are amortized generally for a period of up to 6 years. The underwriting emphasis is on a borrower’s perceived intent and ability to pay rather than collateral value. No consumer loans are sold to the secondary market.

The ALLL is established as follows:

         
  December 31 
  2008  2007 
 
Mortgage loans on real estate        
Residential 1-4 family $231,705  $227,304 
Commercial  200,398   158,982 
Agricultural  31,656   19,951 
Construction and land development  16,571   15,060 
Second mortgages  46,103   36,393 
Equity lines of credit  25,018   19,180 
         
Total mortgage loans  551,451   476,870 
Commercial and agricultural loans        
Commercial  124,408   79,324 
Agricultural production  26,347   27,456 
         
Total commercial and agricultural loans  150,755   106,780 
Consumer installment loans  33,179   29,037 
         
Total loans  735,385   612,687 
Less: allowance for loan losses  11,982   7,301 
         
Loans, net
 $723,403  $605,386 
         
losses are estimated to have occurred through a provision for loan losses charged to earnings. Loan losses are charged against the ALLL when management believes the uncollectibility of the loan balance is confirmed. Subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the allowance.

The ALLL is evaluated on a regular basis by management and is based upon management’s periodic review of the collectibility of the loans in light of historical experience, the nature and volume of the loan portfolio, adverse situations that may affect the borrower’s ability to repay, estimated value of any underlying collateral, and prevailing economic conditions. This evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires estimates that are susceptible to significant revision as more information becomes available.

The primary factors behind the determination of the level of the ALLL are specific allocations for impaired loans, historical loss percentages, as well as unallocated components. Specific allocations for impaired loans are primarily determined based on the difference between the net realizable value of the loan’s underlying collateral or the net present value of the projected payment stream and its recorded investment. Historical loss allocations are calculated at the loan class and segment levels based on a migration analysis of the loan portfolio over the preceding three years. An unallocated component is maintained to cover uncertainties that management believes affect its estimate of probable losses based on qualitative factors. The unallocated component of the allowance reflects the margin of imprecision inherent in the underlying assumptions used in the methodologies for estimating specific and general losses in the portfolio.

Allowance for Loan Losses

A summary of changes in the allowance for loan losses (ALLL) and the recorded investment in loans by segments follows:

Allowance for Credit Losses and Recorded Investment in Loans 
Year Ended December 31, 2011 
   Commercial  Agricultural  Residential
Real
Estate
  Consumer  Unallocated  Total 

Allowance for loan losses

       

January 1, 2011

  $6,048   $1,033   $3,198   $605   $1,489   $12,373  

Loans charged off

   (1,863  (121  (2,240  (552      (4,776

Recoveries

   460    1    177    314        952  

Provision for loan losses

   1,639    90    1,845    266    (14  3,826  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

December 31, 2011

  $6,284   $1,003   $2,980   $633   $1,475   $12,375  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Allowance for loan losses as of December 31, 2011

       

Individually evaluated for impairment

  $2,152   $822   $1,146   $   $   $4,120  

Collectively evaluated for impairment

   4,132    181    1,834    633    1,475    8,255  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

  $6,284   $1,003   $2,980   $633   $1,475   $12,375  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Loans as of December 31, 2011

       

Individually evaluated for impairment

  $14,097   $3,384   $7,664   $105    $25,250  

Collectively evaluated for impairment

   351,617    71,261    270,696    31,467     725,041  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $365,714   $74,645   $278,360   $31,572    $750,291  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Allowance for Credit Losses and Recorded Investment in Loans

 
Year Ended December 31, 2010 
   Commercial  Agricultural   Residential
Real Estate
  Consumer  Unallocated  Total 

Allowance for loan losses

        

January 1, 2010

  $5,531   $731    $3,590   $626   $2,501   $12,979  

Loans charged off

   (3,731       (2,524  (596      (6,851

Recoveries

   452    1     638    297        1,388  

Provision for loan losses

   3,796    301     1,494    278    (1,012  4,857  
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

December 31, 2010

  $6,048   $1,033    $3,198   $605   $1,489   $12,373  
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Allowance for loan losses as of December 31, 2010

        

Individually evaluated for impairment

  $490   $558    $732   $   $   $1,780  

Collectively evaluated for impairment

   5,558    475     2,466    605    1,489    10,593  
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

  $6,048   $1,033    $3,198   $605   $1,489   $12,373  
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Loans as of December 31, 2010

        

Individually evaluated for impairment

  $4,939   $2,196    $4,865   $48    $12,048  

Collectively evaluated for impairment

   343,913    69,250     279,164    30,929     723,256  
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $348,852   $71,446    $284,029   $30,977    $735,304  
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Following is a summary of changes in the ALLL for the year ended December 31, 2009:

January 1, 2009

  $11,982  

Loans charged off

   (6,642

Recoveries

   1,546  

Provision for loan losses

   6,093  
  

 

 

 

December 31, 2009

  $12,979  
  

 

 

 

Credit Quality Indicators

The following table displays the credit quality indicators for commercial and agricultural credit exposures based on internally assigned credit ratings as of December 31:

   2011 
   Commercial   Agricultural 
   Real Estate   Other   Total   Real Estate   Other   Total 

Rating

            

2 — High quality

  $11,113    $11,013    $22,126    $3,583    $1,390    $4,973  

3 — High satisfactory

   90,064     29,972     120,036     11,154     5,186     16,340  

4 — Low satisfactory

   118,611     57,572     176,183     24,253     15,750     40,003  

5 — Special mention

   15,482     4,200     19,682     3,863     2,907     6,770  

6 — Substandard

   19,017     4,819     23,836     1,640     4,314     5,954  

7 — Vulnerable

   187          187                 

8 — Doubtful

   3,621     43     3,664     190     415     605  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $258,095    $107,619    $365,714    $44,683    $29,962    $74,645  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

   2010 
   Commercial   Agricultural 
   Real Estate   Other   Total   Real Estate   Other   Total 

Rating

            

2 — High quality

  $10,995    $13,525    $24,520    $3,792    $1,134    $4,926  

3 — High satisfactory

   74,912     30,322     105,234     11,247     3,235     14,482  

4 — Low satisfactory

   119,912     57,403     177,315     22,384     14,862     37,246  

5 — Special mention

   19,560     6,507     26,067     4,169     3,356     7,525  

6 — Substandard

   10,234     1,104     11,338     2,654     4,613     7,267  

7 — Vulnerable

   3,339     54     3,393                 

8 — Doubtful

   858     127     985                 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $239,810    $109,042    $348,852    $44,246    $27,200    $71,446  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Internally assigned risk ratings are reviewed, at a minimum, when loans are renewed or when management has knowledge of improvements or deterioration of the credit quality of individual credits. Descriptions of the internally assigned risk ratings for commercial and agricultural loans are as follows:

1.    EXCELLENT — Substantially Risk Free

Credit has strong financial condition and solid earnings history, characterized by:

             
  Year Ended December 31 
  2008  2007  2006 
 
Balance at beginning of year $7,301  $7,605  $6,899 
Allowance of acquired bank  822      726 
Loans charged off  (6,325)  (2,146)  (1,149)
Recoveries  684   631   447 
Provision charged to income  9,500   1,211   682 
             
Balance at end of year
 $11,982  $7,301  $7,605 
             

High liquidity, strong cash flow, low leverage.


40

Unquestioned ability to meet all obligations when due.

Experienced management, with management succession in place.

Secured by cash.

2.HIGH QUALITY — Limited Risk

Credit with sound financial condition and has a positive trend in earnings supplemented by:

Favorable liquidity and leverage ratios.

Ability to meet all obligations when due.


Management with successful track record.

Steady and satisfactory earnings history.

If loan is secured, collateral is of high quality and readily marketable.

Access to alternative financing.

Well defined primary and secondary source of repayment.

If supported by guaranty, the financial strength and liquidity of the guarantor(s) are clearly evident.

3.    HIGH SATISFACTORY — Reasonable Risk

Credit with satisfactory financial condition and further characterized by:

Working capital adequate to support operations.

Cash flow sufficient to pay debts as scheduled.

Management experience and depth appear favorable.

Loan performing according to terms.

If loan is secured, collateral is acceptable and loan is fully protected.

4.    LOW SATISFACTORY — Acceptable Risk

Credit with bankable risks, although some signs of weaknesses are shown:

Would include most start-up businesses.

Occasional instances of trade slowness or repayment delinquency — may have been 10-30 days slow within the past year.

Management’s abilities are apparent, yet unproven.

Weakness in primary source of repayment with adequate secondary source of repayment.

Loan structure generally in accordance with policy.

If secured, loan collateral coverage is marginal.

Adequate cash flow to service debt, but coverage is low.

To be classified as less than satisfactory, only one of the following criteria must be met.

5.    SPECIAL MENTION — Criticized

Credit constitutes an undue and unwarranted credit risk but not to the point of justifying a classification of substandard. The credit risk may be relatively minor yet constitute an unwarranted risk in light of the circumstances surrounding a specific loan:

Downward trend in sales, profit levels and margins.

Impaired working capital position.

Cash flow is strained in order to meet debt repayment.

Loan delinquency (30-60 days) and overdrafts may occur.

Shrinking equity cushion.

Diminishing primary source of repayment and questionable secondary source.

Management abilities are questionable.

Weak industry conditions.

Litigation pending against the borrower.

Collateral / guaranty offers limited protection.

Negative debt service coverage, however the credit is well collateralized and payments are current.

6.    SUBSTANDARD — Classified

Credit where the borrower’s current net worth, paying capacity, and value of the collateral pledged is inadequate. There is a distinct possibility that the Corporation will implement collection procedures if the loan deficiencies are not corrected. In addition, the following characteristics may apply:

Sustained losses have severely eroded the equity and cash flow.

Deteriorating liquidity.

Serious management problems or internal fraud.

Original repayment terms liberalized.

Likelihood of bankruptcy.

Inability to access other funding sources.

Reliance on secondary source of repayment.

Litigation filed against borrower.

Collateral provides little or no value.

Requires excessive attention of the loan officer.

Borrower is uncooperative with loan officer.

7.    VULNERABLE — Classified

Credit is considered “Substandard” and warrants placing on nonaccrual. Risk of loss is being evaluated and exit strategy options are under review. Other characteristics that may apply:

Insufficient cash flow to service debt.

Minimal or no payments being received.

Limited options available to avoid the collection process.

Transition status, expect action will take place to collect loan without immediate progress being made.

8.    DOUBTFUL — Workout

Credit has all the weaknesses inherent in a “Substandard” loan with the added characteristic that collection and/or liquidation is pending. The possibility of a loss is extremely high, but its classification as a loss is deferred until liquidation procedures are completed, or reasonably estimable. Other characteristics that may apply:

Normal operations are severely diminished or have ceased.

Seriously impaired cash flow.

Original repayment terms materially altered.

Secondary source of repayment is inadequate.

Survivability as a “going concern” is impossible.

Collection process has begun.

Bankruptcy petition has been filed.

Judgments have been filed.

Portion of the loan balance has been charged-off.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS9.    LOSS(Continued)Charge off

Credits are considered uncollectible and of such little value that their continuance as bankable assets is not warranted. This classification is for charged off loans but does not mean that the asset has absolutely no recovery or salvage value. These loans are further characterized by:

Liquidation or reorganization under bankruptcy, with poor prospects of collection.

Fraudulently overstated assets and/or earnings.

Collateral has marginal or no value.

Debtor cannot be located.

Over 120 days delinquent.

The Corporation’s primary credit quality indicators for residential real estate and consumer loans is the individual loan’s past due aging. The following tables summarize the Corporation’s past due and current loans as of December 31:

   2011 
   Accruing Interest
and Past Due:
   Nonaccrual   Total
Past Due
and
Nonaccrual
   Current   Total 
          
  30-89   90 Days         
  Days   or More         

Commercial

            

Commercial real estate

  $1,721    $364    $4,176    $6,261    $251,834    $258,095  

Commercial other

   426     3     25     454     107,165     107,619  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total commercial

   2,147     367     4,201     6,715     358,999     365,714  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Agricultural

            

Agricultural real estate

        99     189     288     44,395     44,683  

Agricultural other

   2          415     417     29,545     29,962  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total agricultural

   2     99     604     705     73,940     74,645  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Residential mortgage

            

Senior liens

   3,004     124     1,292     4,420     213,181     217,601  

Junior liens

   235     40     94     369     20,877     21,246  

Home equity lines of credit

   185     125     198     508     39,005     39,513  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total residential mortgage

   3,424     289     1,584     5,297     273,063     278,360  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Consumer

            

Secured

   158     5          163     26,011     26,174  

Unsecured

   23               23     5,375     5,398  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total consumer

   181     5          186     31,386     31,572  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $5,754    $760    $6,389    $12,903    $737,388    $750,291  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

   2010 
   Accruing Interest
and Past Due:
   Nonaccrual   Total
Past Due
and
Nonaccrual
   Current   Total 
          
  30-89   90 Days         
  Days   or More         

Commercial

            

Commercial real estate

  $4,814    $125    $4,001    $8,940    $230,870    $239,810  

Commercial other

   381          139     520     108,522     109,042  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total commercial

   5,195     125     4,140     9,460     339,392     348,852  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Agricultural

            

Agricultural real estate

   92               92     44,154     44,246  

Agricultural other

   4     50          54     27,146     27,200  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total agricultural

   96     50          146     71,300     71,446  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Residential mortgage

            

Senior liens

   5,265     310     1,421     6,996     213,003     219,999  

Junior liens

   476          49     525     26,187     26,712  

Home equity lines of credit

   598               598     36,720     37,318  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total residential mortgage

   6,339     310     1,470     8,119     275,910     284,029  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Consumer

            

Secured

   298               298     24,781     25,079  

Unsecured

   10     1          11     5,887     5,898  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total consumer

   308     1          309     30,668     30,977  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $11,938    $486    $5,610    $18,034    $717,270    $735,304  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

December 31, 2009

  $10,305    $768    $8,522    $19,595    $703,721    $723,316  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Impaired Loans

As a result of adopting the amendments in ASU No. 2011-02, the Corporation reassessed all loan restructurings that occurred on or after January 1, 2011 for identification as troubled debt restructurings (TDR’s). The Corporation identified as TDR’s certain loans for which the allowance for loan losses had previously been measured under a general allowance for loan losses methodology. Upon identifying those loans as TDR’s, the Corporation classified them as impaired. The amendments in ASU No. 2011-02 require retrospective application of the impairment measurement guidance for those loans newly identified as impaired during the period. The Corporation’s recorded investment in loans for which the allowance for credit losses was previously measured under a general allowance for credit losses methodology and are now impaired was $5,136, with a specific valuation allowance of $1,022 as of December 31, 2011.

Loans may be classified as impaired if they meet one or more of the following criteria:

1.   There has been a chargeoff of its principal balance (in whole or in part);

2.   The loan has been classified as a TDR; or

3.   The loan is in nonaccrual status.

Impairment is measured on a loan by loan basis for commercial, commercial real estate loans, agricultural, or agricultural mortgage loans by either the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, the loan’s obtainable market price, or the fair value of the collateral, less cost to sell, if the loan is collateral dependent. Large groups of smaller balance homogeneous loans are collectively evaluated for impairment.

Interest income is recognized on impaired loans in nonaccrual status on the cash basis, but only after all principal has been collected. For impaired loans not in nonaccrual status, interest income is recognized daily as earned according to the terms of the loan agreement.

The following is a summary of information pertaining to impaired loans atas of and for the year ended December 31:

         
  2008  2007 
 
Impaired loans with a valuation allowance $9,603  $3,779 
Impaired loans without a valuation allowance $411  $ 
Total impaired loans accruing interest $2,796  $1,292 
Valuation allowance related to impaired loans $2,065  $703 
Total nonaccrual loans $11,175  $4,156 
Accruing loans past due 90 days or more $1,251  $1,727 
Average investment in impaired loans $6,636  $3,768 
Total restructured loans $4,550  $685 
Interest income recognized on

   2011   2011 Year to Date 
   Outstanding
Balance
   Unpaid
Principal
Balance
   Valuation
Allowance
   Average
Outstanding
Balance
   Interest
Income
Recognized
 

Impaired loans with a valuation allowance

          

Commercial real estate

  $5,014    $5,142    $1,881    $4,012    $247  

Commercial other

   734     734     271     376     25  

Agricultural real estate

                  9       

Agricultural other

   2,689     2,689     822     2,443     138  

Residential mortgage senior liens

   7,269     8,825     1,111     5,781     331  

Residential mortgage junior liens

   195     260     35     184     11  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total impaired loans with a valuation allowance

   15,901     17,650     4,120     12,805     752  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Impaired loans without a valuation allowance

          

Commercial real estate

   7,984     10,570       4,863     375  

Commercial other

   365     460       267     10  

Agricultural real estate

   190     190       180       

Agricultural other

   505     625       253     18  

Residential mortgage senior liens

   2     2       202       

Home equity lines of credit

   198     498       99     12  

Consumer secured

   105     114       77     4  
  

 

 

   

 

 

     

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total impaired loans without a valuation allowance

   9,349     12,459       5,941     419  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Impaired loans

          

Commercial

   14,097     16,906     2,152     9,518     657  

Agricultural

   3,384     3,504     822     2,885     156  

Residential mortgage

   7,664     9,585     1,146     6,266     354  

Consumer

   105     114          77     4  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total impaired loans

  $25,250    $30,109    $4,120    $18,746    $1,171  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

   2010   2010 Year to Date 
   Outstanding
Balance
   Unpaid
Principal
Balance
   Valuation
Allowance
   Average
Outstanding
Balance
   Interest
Income
Recognized
 

Impaired loans with a valuation allowance

          

Commercial real estate

  $3,010    $4,110    $472    $2,482    $90  

Commercial other

   18     18     18     259     1  

Agricultural other

   2,196     2,196     558     1,098     143  

Residential mortgage senior liens

   4,292     5,236     698     5,045     187  

Residential mortgage junior liens

   172     250     34     205     7  

Consumer

                  12       
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total impaired loans with a valuation allowance

   9,688     11,810     1,780     9,101     428  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Impaired loans without a valuation allowance

          

Commercial real estate

   1,742     2,669       2,738     147  

Commercial other

   169     269       145     20  

Agricultural real estate

               106       

Residential mortgage senior liens

   401     501       201     26  

Home equity lines of credit

               8       

Consumer secured

   48     85       55     5  
  

 

 

   

 

 

     

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total impaired loans without a valuation allowance

   2,360     3,524       3,253     198  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Impaired loans

          

Commercial

   4,939     7,066     490     5,624     258  

Agricultural

   2,196     2,196     558     1,204     143  

Residential mortgage

   4,865     5,987     732     5,459     220  

Consumer

   48     85          67     5  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total impaired loans

  $12,048    $15,334    $1,780    $12,354    $626  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

   2009 

Impaired loans with a valuation allowance

  $3,757  

Impaired loans without a valuation allowance

   8,897  
  

 

 

 

Total impaired loans

  $12,654  
  

 

 

 

Valuation allowance related to impaired loans

  $612  

Year to date average outstanding balance of impaired loans

  $13,249  

Year to date interest income recognized on impared loans

  $340  

The Corporation had committed to advance $243 in connection with impaired loans, was not significant during anywhich include TDR’s, as of the three years ended December 31, 2008.2011. No additional funds arewere committed to be advanced in connection with impaired loans.

Note 6 — Servicing
Residential mortgage loans, serviced for others are not included in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. The unpaid principal balances of mortgages serviced for others was $254,495, $255,839, and $255,577 at December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006 respectively; such loans are not included in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. The fair value of servicing rights was determined using a discount rate of 8.1%, prepayment speeds ranging from 6.0% to 25.8%, depending upon the stratification of the specific right and a weighted average default rate of 0.0%. Servicing loans for others generally consists of collecting mortgage payments, maintaining escrow accounts, disbursing payments to investors and taxing authorities, and foreclosure processing.
The following table summarizes the changes in each year of the carrying value of mortgage servicing rights included in other assets as of December 31, 2010.

Troubled Debt Restructurings

Loan modifications are considered to be TDR’s when the modification includes terms outside of normal lending practices to a borrower who is experiencing financial difficulties.

Typical concessions granted include, but are not limited to:

1.   Agreeing to interest rates below prevailing market rates for debt with similar risk characteristics.

2.  Extending the amortization period beyond typical lending guidelines for debt with similar risk characteristics.

3.  Forbearance of principal.

4.  Forbearance of accrued interest.

To determine if a borrower is experiencing financial difficulties, the Corporation considers if:

1.  The borrower is currently in default on any of their debt.

2. ��It is likely that the borrower would default on any of their debt if the concession was not granted.

3.  The borrower’s cash flow was sufficient to service all of their debt if the concession was not granted.

4.  The borrower has declared, or is in the process of declaring, bankruptcy.

5.  The borrower is a going concern (if the entity is a business).

The following is a summary of information pertaining to TDR’s during 2011:

   Number
of
Loans
   Pre-
Modification
Recorded
Investment
   Post-
Modification
Recorded
Investment
 

Commercial

      

Commercial real estate

   1    $408    $408  

Commercial other

   42     12,575     12,132  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total commercial

   43     12,983     12,540  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Agricultural other

   8     1,321     1,321  

Residential mortgage senior liens

   36     3,915     3,865  

Consumer

      

Secured

   7     69     69  

Unsecured

   2     20     20  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total consumer

   9     89     89  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $96    $18,308    $17,815  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

The following tables summarize concessions granted by the Corporation to borrowers in financial difficulties during 2011:

   Below Market
Interest Rate
   Below Market
Interest Rate and
Extension of
Amortization Period
 
   Number of
Loans
   Pre-
Modification
Recorded
Investment
   Number of
Loans
   Pre-
Modification
Recorded
Investment
 

Commercial

        

Commercial real estate

   1    $408         $  

Commercial other

   38     9,932     4     2,643  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total commercial

   39     10,340     4     2,643  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Agricultural other

   8     1,321            

Residential mortgage Senior liens

   19     2,161     17     1,754  

Consumer

        

Secured

   6     65     1     4  

Unsecured

             2     20  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total consumer

   6     65     3     24  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   72    $13,887     24    $4,421  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

The Corporation did not restructure any loans through the forbearance of principal or accrued interest during 2011.

Based on the Corporation’s historical loss experience, losses associated with TDR’s are not significantly different than other impaired loans within the same loan segment. As such, TDR’s, including TDR’s that have been modified in the past 12 months that subsequently defaulted, are analyzed in the same manner as other impaired loans within their respective loan segment. The Corporation had no loans that were modified as troubled debt restructurings since January 1, 2010 that subsequently defaulted.

The following is a summary of TDR loan balances as of December 31:

             
  2008  2007  2006 
 
Balance at beginning of year $2,198  $2,155  $2,125 
Mortgage servicing rights capitalized  3,079   2,869   2,655 
Accumulated amortization  (3,016)  (2,785)  (2,589)
Impairment valuation allowance  (156)  (41)  (36)
             
Balance at end of year
 $2,105  $2,198  $2,155 
             
Impairment losses recognized $115  $5  $24 
             

   2011   2010   2009 

Troubled debt restructurings

  $18,756    $5,763    $4,977  

NoteNOTE 7 — Premises and EquipmentPREMISES AND EQUIPMENT

A summary of premises and equipment at December 31 follows:

         
  2008  2007 
 
Land $4,665  $3,997 
Buildings and improvements  18,653   16,067 
Furniture and equipment  23,043   23,226 
         
Total  46,361   43,290 
Less: Accumulated depreciation  23,130   20,774 
         
Premises and equipment, net
 $23,231  $22,516 
         

   2011   2010 

Land

  $5,174    $4,694  

Buildings and improvements

   22,397     21,502  

Furniture and equipment

   26,926     25,822  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   54,497     52,018  

Less: accumulated depreciation

   29,871     27,391  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Premises and equipment, net

  $24,626    $24,627  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Depreciation expense amounted to $2,171, $1,960$2,521, $2,522 and $1,852$2,349 in 2008, 2007,2011, 2010, and 2006,2009, respectively.


41


NOTE 8 — GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Note 8��— Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
The change in the carrying amount of goodwill for the year is as follows:
         
  2008  2007 
 
Balance January 1 $25,889  $25,889 
Goodwill identified in GCFC acquisition (See Note 2)  21,319    
Reclassificaiton for goodwill contributed to CT/IBT Title Agency, LLC joint venture (See Note 2)  (1,590)   
         
Balance at December 31
 $45,618  $25,889 
         
was $45,618 at December 31, 2011 and 2010.

Identifiable intangible assets at year end were as follows:

             
  2008 
  Gross
     Net
 
  Intangible
  Accumulated
  Intangible
 
  Assets  Amortization  Assets 
 
Amortizable intangible assets:            
Core deposit premium resulting from the Greenville acquisition in 2008 $1,480  $185  $1,295 
Core deposit premium resulting from the Farwell acquisition in 2006  1,442   551   891 
Core deposit premium resulting from previous acquisitions  2,451   2,451    
             
Total
 $5,373  $3,187  $2,186 
             
             
  2007 
  Gross
     Net
 
  Intangible
  Accumulated
  Intangible
 
  Assets  Amortization  Assets 
 
Amortizable intangible assets:            
Core deposit premium resulting from the Farwell acquisition in 2006 $1,442  $321  $1,121 
Core deposit premium resulting from previous acquisitions  2,451   2,451    
             
Total
 $3,893  $2,772  $1,121 
             

   2011 
   Gross
Intangible
Assets
   Accumulated
Amortization
   Net
Intangible
Assets
 

Core deposit premium resulting from acquisitions

  $5,373    $4,199    $1,174  

   2010 
   Gross
Intangible
Assets
   Accumulated
Amortization
   Net
Intangible
Assets
 

Core deposit premium resultingfrom acquisitions

  $5,373    $3,900    $1,473  

Amortization expense associated with identifiable intangible assets was $415, $278,$299, $338, and $160$375 in 2008, 2007,2011, 2010, and 2006,2009, respectively.

Estimated amortization expense associated with identifiable intangibles for each of the next five years succeeding December 31, 2011, and thereafter is as follows:

     
Year
 Amount 
 
2009 $376 
2010  337 
2011  299 
2012  261 
2013  221 
Thereafter  692 
     
  $2,186 
     


42


Year

  Amount 

2012

  $260  

2013

   221  

2014

   183  

2015

   145  

2016

   106  

Thereafter

   259  
  

 

 

 
  $1,174  
  

 

 

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
NoteNOTE 9 — DepositsDEPOSITS

Scheduled maturities of time deposits for the next five years, succeeding December 31, 2008and thereafter, are as follows:

     
Year
 Amount 
 
2009 $240,339 
2010  63,464 
2011  29,771 
2012  21,565 
2013  24,860 
Thereafter  1,589 
     
  $381,588 
     

Year

  Amount 

2012

  $265,299  

2013

   63,290  

2014

   46,802  

2015

   55,493  

2016

   43,601  

Thereafter

   7,052  
  

 

 

 
  $481,537  
  

 

 

 

Interest expense on time deposits greater than $100 was $6,525$4,302 in 2008, $6,6492011, $4,427 in 2007,2010, and $5,195$5,246 in 2006.

2009.

NoteNOTE 10 — Borrowed FundsBORROWED FUNDS

Borrowed funds consist of the following obligations at December 31:

         
  2008  2007 
 
Federal Home Loan Bank advances $150,220  $66,023 
Federal Funds purchased  9,700   15,883 
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase without stated maturity dates  42,430   981 
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase with stated maturity dates  20,000   10,000 
         
  $222,350  $92,887 
         

   2011  2010 
   Amount   Rate  Amount   Rate 

Federal Home Loan Bank advances

  $142,242     3.16 $113,423     3.64

Securities sold under agreements to repurchase without stated maturity dates

   57,198     0.25  45,871     0.25

Securities sold under agreements to repurchase with stated maturity dates

   16,696     3.51  19,623     3.28

Federal funds purchased

            16,000     0.60
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $216,136     2.42 $194,917     2.56
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

The Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings are collateralized by U.S. government and federal agency securities and a blanket lien on all qualified 1-to-4 family whole mortgage loans and U.S. government and federal agency securities.loans. Advances are also secured by FHLB stock owned by the Bank.

Corporation. The Corporation had the ability to borrow up to an additional $110,069, based on the assets currently pledged as collateral.

The maturity and weighted average interest rates of FHLB advances are as follows atas of December 31:

                 
  2008  2007 
  Amount  Rate  Amount  Rate 
 
Fixed rate advances due 2008 $     $6,131   4.79%
Fixed rate advances due 2009  42,215   1.89%  11,500   4.95%
Fixed rate advances due 2010  29,516   4.58%  18,392   5.08%
Fixed rate advances due 2011  10,225   3.96%      
One year putable advances due 2010  5,000   5.18%  3,000   4.98%
One year putable advances due 2011  1,000   4.75%      
One year putable advances due 2012  5,000   4.07%  15,000   4.10%
Fixed rate advances due 2012  17,000   4.19%  2,000   4.90%
One year putable advances due 2013  10,264   3.66%      
Fixed rate advances due 2014  5,000   4.38%      
Fixed rate advances due 2015  25,000   4.63%  10,000   4.84%
                 
  $150,220   3.68% $66,023   4.76%
                 

   2011  2010 
   Amount   Rate  Amount   Rate 

Fixed rate advances due 2011

  $        $10,086     3.96

One year putable advances due 2011

            1,000     4.75

Fixed rate advances due 2012

   17,000     2.97  17,000     2.97

One year putable advances due 2012

   15,000     4.10  15,000     4.10

Fixed rate advances due 2013

   5,242     4.14  5,337     4.14

One year putable advances due 2013

   5,000     3.15  5,000     3.15

Fixed rate advances due 2014

   25,000     3.16  25,000     3.16

Fixed rate advances due 2015

   45,000     3.30  25,000     4.63

Fixed rate advances due 2016

   10,000     2.15         

Fixed rate advances due 2017

   20,000     2.56  10,000     2.35
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $142,242     3.16 $113,423     3.64
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Securities sold under agreements to repurchase are classified as secured borrowings. Securities sold under agreements to repurchase without stated maturity dates generally mature within one to four days from the transaction date. Securities sold under agreements to repurchase are reflected at the amount of cash received in


43


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
connection with the transaction. The U.S. government agency securities underlying the agreements have a carrying value and a fair value of $64,876$99,869 and $16,072$86,381 at December 31, 20082011 and 2007,2010, respectively. Such securities remain under the control of the Corporation. The Corporation may be required to provide additional collateral based on the fair value of underlying securities.

The maturity and weighted average interest rates of securities sold under agreements to repurchase with stated maturity dates are as follows at December 31:

                 
  2008  2007 
  Amount  Rate  Amount  Rate 
 
Repurchase agreements due 2010 $5,000   4.00% $5,000   4.00%
Repurchase agreements due 2013  5,000   4.51%  5,000   4.51%
Repurchase agreements due 2014  10,000   3.19%      
                 
  $20,000   3.72% $10,000   4.26%
                 

   2011  2010 
   Amount   Rate  Amount   Rate 

Repurchase agreements due 2011

  $        $858     1.51

Repurchase agreements due 2012

   428     2.08  1,013     2.21

Repurchase agreements due 2013

   5,000     4.51  5,127     4.45

Repurchase agreements due 2014

   10,869     3.12  12,087     3.00

Repurchase agreements due 2015

   399     3.25  538     3.25
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $16,696     3.51 $19,623     3.28
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Securities sold under repurchase agreements without stated maturity dates, federal funds purchased, and Federal Reserve Bank discount window advances generally mature within one to four days from the transaction date. The following table provides a summary of short term borrowings for the years ended December 31:

   2011  2010 
   Maximum
Month-End
Balance
   YTD
Average
Balance
   Weighted Average
Interest Rate
During the Period
  Maximum
Month-End
Balance
   YTD
Average
Balance
   Weighted Average
Interest Rate
During the Period
 

Securities sold under agreements to repurchase without stated maturity dates

  $57,198    $45,397     0.25 $56,410    $44,974     0.28

Federal funds purchased

   18,300     3,467     0.51  16,000     333     0.60

Federal Reserve Bank discount window advance

                 7,500     103     0.75

The Corporation had pledged certificates of deposit held in other financial institutions, trading securities, available-for-sale securities, and 1-4 family mortgage loans in the following amounts at December 31:

   2011   2010 

Pledged to secure borrowed funds

  $292,092    $297,297  

Pledged to secure repurchase agreements

   99,869     86,381  

Pledged for public deposits and for other purposes necessary or required by law

   26,761     14,626  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $418,722    $398,304  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

The Corporation had no investment securities that are restricted to be pledged for specific purposes.

NoteNOTE 11 — Other Noninterest ExpensesOTHER NONINTEREST EXPENSES

A summary of expenses included in Other Noninterest Expenses are as follows for the year ended December 31:

             
  2008  2007  2006 
 
Director fees $867  $796  $584 
Marketing and advertising  691   642   697 
Audit and SOX compliance fees  565   583   1,010 
Other, not individually significant  5,705   4,527   3,715 
             
  $7,828  $6,548  $6,006 
             

   2011   2010   2009 

Marketing and community relations

  $1,174    $1,093    $894  

Directors fees

   842     887     923  

Audit and SOX compliance fees

   714     710     546  

Foreclosed asset and collection

   576     916     831  

Education and travel

   526     499     395  

Printing and supplies

   405     420     529  

Postage and freight

   388     395     472  

Consulting fees

   386     167     201  

Legal fees

   302     382     415  

Amortization of deposit premium

   299     338     375  

All other

   1,573     1,499     1,798  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total other

  $7,185    $7,306    $7,379  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

NoteNOTE 12 — Federal Income TaxesFEDERAL INCOME TAXES

Components of the consolidated provision (benefit) for income taxes are as follows for the year ended December 31:

             
  2008  2007  2006 
 
Currently payable $1,088  $1,304  $1,645 
Deferred (benefit) expense  (1,812)  301   274 
             
Federal income tax (benefit) expense
 $(724) $1,605  $1,919 
             

   2011   2010   2009 

Currently payable

  $965    $1,425    $1,487  

Deferred expense (benefit)

   389     179     (641
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Income tax expense

  $1,354    $1,604    $846  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

The reconciliation of the provision (benefit) for federal income taxes and the amount computed at the federal statutory tax rate of 34% of income before federal income tax (benefit) expensetaxes is as follows for the yearyears ended December 31:

             
  2008  2007  2006 
 
Income taxes at 34% statutory rate $1,148  $3,242  $3,033 
Effect of nontaxable income  (2,088)  (1,782)  (1,239)
Effect of nondeductible expenses  216   145   125 
             
Federal income tax (benefit) expense
 $(724) $1,605  $1,919 
             


44


   2011  2010  2009 

Income taxes at 34% statutory rate

  $3,932   $3,621   $2,940  

Effect of nontaxable income

    

Interest income on tax exempt municipal bonds

   (1,687  (1,565  (1,680

Earnings on corporate owned life insurance

   (207  (225  (218

Other

   (65  (132  (249
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total effect of nontaxable income

   (1,959  (1,922  (2,147

Effect of tax credits

   (793  (263  (134

Effect of nondeductible expenses

   174    168    187  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Income tax expense

  $1,354   $1,604   $846  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for federal income tax purposes. Significant components of the Corporation’sCorporation's deferred tax assets and liabilities, included in other assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets, are as follows as of December 31:
         
  2008  2007 
 
Deferred tax assets
        
Allowance for loan losses $3,145  $1,658 
Deferred directors’ fees  1,930   1,803 
Employee benefit plans  80   33 
Core deposit premium and acquisition expenses  252   116 
Net unrealized losses on trading securities  32   119 
Net unrecognized actuarial loss on pension plan  1,211   424 
Life insurance death benefit payable  804    
Other  860   209 
         
Total deferred tax assets
  8,314   4,362 
         
Deferred tax liabilities
        
Prepaid pension cost  951   899 
Premises and equipment  620   606 
Accretion on securities  45   47 
Core deposit premium and acquisition expenses  506   315 
Net unrealized gains on available-for-sale securities  930   286 
Other  193   194 
         
Total deferred tax liabilities
  3,245   2,347 
         
Net deferred tax assets
 $5,069  $2,015 
         
In July 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Interpretation No. 48,Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes(FIN No. 48), an interpretation of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 109,Accounting for Income Taxes. FIN No. 48 seeks to reduce the significant diversity in practice associated with financial statement recognition and measurement in accounting for income taxes and prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for disclosure of tax positions taken or expected to be taken on an income tax return, in order for those tax provisions to be recognized in the Corporation’s financial statements. During 2007, the Corporation adopted the provisions of FIN No. 48. The adoption had no effect on the Corporation’s financial statements.

   2011   2010 

Deferred tax assets

    

Allowance for loan losses

  $3,278    $3,270  

Deferred directors’ fees

   2,384     2,364  

Employee benefit plans

   158     122  

Core deposit premium and acquisition expenses

   800     694  

Net unrealized losses on trading securities

   364     400  

Net unrecognized actuarial loss on pension plan

   1,780     1,109  

Life insurance death benefit payable

   804     804  

Alternative minimum tax

   729     686  

Other

   260     219  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total deferred tax assets

   10,557     9,668  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Deferred tax liabilities

    

Prepaid pension cost

   851     851  

Premises and equipment

   992     902  

Accretion on securities

   34     36  

Core deposit premium and acquisition expenses

   1,102     1,000  

Net unrealized gains on available-for-sale securities

   4,564     847  

Other

   937     518  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total deferred tax liabilities

   8,480     4,154  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net deferred tax assets

  $2,077    $5,514  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

The Corporation and its subsidiaries are subject to U.S. federal income tax. The Corporation is no longer subject to examination by taxing authorities for years before 2005.2008. There are no material uncertain tax positions requiring recognition in the Corporation’s consolidated financial statements. The Corporation does not expect the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits to significantly increase in the next twelve months.

The Corporation recognizes interestand/or penalties related to income tax matters in income tax expense. The Corporation does not have any amounts accrued for interest and penalties at December 31, 20082011 and 2010 and is not aware of any claims for such amounts by federal income tax authorities.


45


Included in other comprehensive income for 2011 and 2010 are the changes in unrealized losses of $1,719 and unrealized losses of $226, respectively, related to auction rate money market securities and preferred stock. For federal income tax purposes, these securities are considered equity investments for which no federal deferred income taxes are expected or recorded.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
NoteNOTE 13 — Off-Balance-Sheet ActivitiesOFF-BALANCE-SHEET ACTIVITIES

Credit-Related Financial Instruments

The Corporation is party to credit related financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risk. These financial instruments are entered into in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments, which include commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit, involve, to

varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amounts recognized in the consolidated balance sheets. The contract or notional amounts of these instruments reflect the extent of involvement the Corporation has in a particular class of financial instrument.

         
  Contract Amount 
  2008  2007 
 
Unfunded commitments under lines of credit $106,861  $87,969 
Commercial and standby letters of credit  6,429   4,405 
Commitments to grant loans  10,228   1,069 

   Contract Amount 
   2011   2010 

Unfunded commitments under lines of credit

  $102,822    $110,201  

Commercial and standby letters of credit

   4,461     4,881  

Commitments to grant loans

   21,806     13,382  

Unfunded commitments under commercial lines-of-credit, revolving credit home equity lines of credit and overdraft protection agreements are commitments for possible future extensions of credit to existing customers. TheThese commitments for equity lines of credit may expire without being drawn upon. These lines-of-credit are uncollateralized and usuallyTherefore, the total commitment amounts do not contain a specified maturity datenecessarily represent future cash requirements.

Commercial and may not be drawn upon to the total extent to which the Bank is committed. A majority of such commitments are at fixed rates of interest; a portion is unsecured.

Standbystandby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by the Corporation to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. Those guarantees are primarily issued to support private borrowing arrangements, including commercial paper, bond financing, and similar transactions.
The Corporation considers standby letters of credit to be guarantees. These commitments to extend credit and letters of credit mature within one year. The credit risk involved in these transactions is essentially the same as that involved in extending loans to customers. The Corporation evaluates each customer’scustomer's credit worthiness on acase-by-case basis. The amount of collateral obtained, if deemed necessary by the Corporation upon the extension of credit, is based on management’smanagement's credit evaluation of the borrower. While the Corporation considers standby letters of credit to be guarantees, the amount of the liability related to such guarantees on the commitment date is not significant and a liability related to such guarantees is not recorded on the consolidated balance sheets.

Commitments to extend creditgrant loans are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. The commitments may expire without being drawn upon. Therefore, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. The amount of collateral obtained, if it is deemed necessary by the Bank,Corporation, is based on management’s credit evaluation of the customer.

Commitments to grant loans include loans committed to be sold to the secondary market.

The Corporation’s exposure to credit-related loss in the event of nonperformance by the counter parties to the financial instruments for commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit is represented bycould be up to the contractual notional amount of those instruments. The Corporation uses the same credit policies in deciding to make these commitments as it does for extending loans to customers.

No significant losses are anticipated as a result of these commitments.

NOTE 14 — ON-BALANCE SHEET ACTIVITIES

Note 14 —

On-Balance Sheet Activities
Derivative Loan Commitments

Mortgage loan commitments are referred to as derivative loan commitments if the loan that will result from exercise of the commitment will be held for sale upon funding. The Corporation enters into commitments to fund residential mortgage loans at specific times in the future, with the intention that these loans will subsequently be sold in the secondary market. A mortgage loan commitment binds the Corporation to lend funds to a potential borrower at a specified interest rate within a specified period of time, generally up to 60 days after inception of the rate lock.


46


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Outstanding derivative loan commitments expose the Corporation to the risk that the price of the loans arising from the exercise of the loan commitment might decline from the inception of the rate lock to funding of the loan due to increases in mortgage interest rates. If interest rates increase, the value of these loan commitments decreases. Conversely, if interest rates decrease, the value of these loan commitments increases. The notional amount of undesignated interest rate lock commitments was $334$875 and $311$547 at December 31, 20082011 and 2007,2010, respectively.

Forward Loan Sale Commitments

To protect against the price risk inherent in derivative loan commitments, the Corporation utilizes both “mandatory delivery” and “best efforts” forward loan sale commitments to mitigate the risk of potential decreases in the values of loan that would result from the exercise of the derivative loan commitments.

With a “mandatory delivery” contract, the Corporation commits to deliver a certain principal amount of mortgage loans to an investor at a specified price on or before a specified date. If the Corporation fails to deliver the amount of mortgages necessary to fulfill the commitment by the specified date, it is obligated to pay a “pair-off” fee, based on then current market prices, to the investor to compensate the investor for the shortfall.

With a “best efforts” contract, the Corporation commits to deliver an individual mortgage loan of a specified principal amount and quality to an investor if the loan to the underlying borrower closes. Generally, the price the investor will pay the seller for an individual loan is specified prior to the loan being funded (e.g. on the same day the lender commits to lend funds to a potential borrower).

The Corporation expects that these forward loan sale commitments will experience changes in fair value opposite to the change in fair value of derivatederivative loan commitments. The notional amount of undesignated forward loan sale commitments was $1,232$4,080 and $2,525$1,729 at December 31, 20082011 and 2007,2010, respectively.

The fair values of the rate lock loan commitments related to the origination of mortgage loans that will be held for sale and the forward loan sale commitments are deemed insignificant by management and, accordingly, are not recorded in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

Note 15 —Commitments and other Matters

NOTE 15 — COMMITMENTS AND OTHER MATTERS

Banking regulations require banksthe Bank to maintain cash reserve balances in currency or as deposits with the Federal Reserve Bank. At December 31, 20082011 and 2007,2010, the reserve balances amounted to $700$821 and $370,$470, respectively.

Isabella Bank sponsors the IBT Foundation (the “Foundation”), which is a nonprofit entity formed for the purpose of distributing charitable donations to recipient organizations generally located in the communities serviced by Isabella Bank. The Bank periodically makes charitable contributions in the form of cash transfers to the Foundation. The Foundation is administered by members of the Isabella Bank Board of Directors. The assets and transactions of the Foundation are not included in the consolidated financial statements of Isabella Bank Corporation. During 2008, 2007, and 2006, the Corporation contributed $78 ,$0, and $0 respectively to the Foundation. The assets of the Foundation as of December 31, 2008 and 2007 were $953 and $1,069, respectively.

Banking regulations limit the transfer of assets in the form of dividends, loans, or advances from the Bank to the Corporation. At December 31, 2008,2011, substantially all of the Bank’s assets were restricted from transfer to the Corporation in the form of loans or advances. Consequently, bank dividends are the principal source of funds for the Corporation. Payment of dividends without regulatory approval is limited to the current years retained net income plus retained net income for the preceding two years, less any required transfers to common stock. At January 1, 2009,2012, the amount available for dividends without regulatory approval was approximately $7,831.

The Bank has obtained approval to borrow up to $200,000 from the Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) of Indianapolis. Under the terms of the agreement, the Bank may obtain advances at the stated rate at the time of the borrowings. The Bank has agreed to pledge eligible mortgage loans and U.S. Treasury and governmental agencies as collateral for any such borrowings.


47

$13,235.


NOTE 16 — MINIMUM REGULATORY CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Note 16 —Minimum Regulatory Capital Requirements
The Corporation (on a consolidated basis) and the Bank are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the Federal Reserve Bank and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (The Regulators)(the “Regulators”). Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate mandatory and possibly additional discretionary actions by Thethe Regulators that if undertaken, could have a material effect on the Corporation’sCorporation's and Bank’s financial statements. Under The Regulators’regulatory capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the Corporation and the Bank must meet specific capital guidelines that include quantitative measures of their assets, liabilities, capital, and certain off-balance-sheet items, as calculated under regulatory accounting standards. The Bank’s capital amounts and classifications are also subject to qualitative judgments by Thethe Regulators about components, risk weightings, and other factors. Prompt corrective action provisions are not applicable to bank holding companies.

Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require the Corporation and the Bank to maintain minimum amounts and ratios (set forth in the following table) of total and Tier 1 capital (as defined in the regulations) to risk-weighted assets (as defined) and Tier 1 capital to average assets (as defined). Management believes, as of December 31, 20082011 and 2007,2010, that the Corporation and the Bank meetmet all capital adequacy requirements to which they are subject.

As of December 31, 2008,2011, the most recent notifications from Thethe Regulators categorized the Bank as well capitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. To be categorized as well capitalized, an institution must maintain total risk-based, Tier 1 risk-based, and Tier 1 leverage ratios as set forth in the following tables. There are no conditions or events since the notifications that management believes has changed the Bank’s categories. The Corporation’sCorporation's and each Bank’sthe Bank's actual capital amounts (in thousands) and ratios are also presented in the table.

                       
        Minimum to be
        Well Capitalized
     Minimum
  Under Prompt
     Capital
  Corrective Action
  Actual  Requirement  Provisions
  Amount  Ratio  Amount  Ratio  Amount  Ratio
 
December 31, 2008
                      
Total capital to risk weighted assets                      
Isabella Bank $89,192   12.4% $57,666   8.0% $72,082  10.0%
Consolidated  98,867   13.5   58,485   8.0   N/A  N/A
Tier 1 capital to risk weighted assets                      
Isabella Bank  80,145   11.1   28,833   4.0   43,249  6.0
Consolidated  89,694   12.3   29,242   4.0   N/A  N/A
Tier 1 capital to average assets                      
Isabella Bank  80,145   7.4   43,069   4.0   53,836  5.0
Consolidated  89,694   8.4   42,603   4.0   N/A  N/A
December 31, 2007
                      
Total capital to risk weighted assets                      
Isabella Bank $75,769   12.7% $47,705   8.0% $59,632  10.0%
Consolidated  103,436   17.0   48,636   8.0   N/A  N/A
Tier 1 capital to risk weighted assets                      
Isabella Bank  68,468   11.5   23,853   4.0   35,779  6.0
Consolidated  96,135   15.8   24,318   4.0   N/A  N/A
Tier 1 capital to average assets                      
Isabella Bank  68,468   7.7   35,723   4.0   44,654  5.0
Consolidated  96,135   10.7   35,936   4.0   N/A  N/A


48


   Actual  Minimum
Capital
Requirement
  Minimum To Be
Well Capitalized
Under Prompt
Corrective Action
Provisions
 
   Amount   Ratio  Amount   Ratio  Amount   Ratio 

December 31, 2011

          

Total capital to risk weighted assets

          

Isabella Bank

  $104,542     13.06 $64,028     8.00 $80,035     10.00

Consolidated

   115,172     14.17    65,009     8.00    N/A     N/A  

Tier 1 capital to risk weighted assets

          

Isabella Bank

   94,508     11.81    32,014     4.00    48,021     6.00  

Consolidated

   104,987     12.92    32,505     4.00    N/A     N/A  

Tier 1 capital to average assets

          

Isabella Bank

   94,508     7.44    50,808     4.00    63,510     5.00  

Consolidated

   104,987     8.18    51,317     4.00    N/A     N/A  
   Actual  Minimum
Capital
Requirement
  Minimum To Be
Well Capitalized
Under Prompt
Corrective Action
Provisions
 
   Amount   Ratio  Amount   Ratio  Amount   Ratio 

December 31, 2010

          

Total capital to risk weighted assets

          

Isabella Bank

  $98,566     12.79 $61,642     8.00 $77,053     10.00

Consolidated

   108,978     13.97    62,423     8.00    N/A     N/A  

Tier 1 capital to risk weighted assets

          

Isabella Bank

   88,901     11.54    30,821     4.00    46,232     6.00  

Consolidated

   99,192     12.71    31,212     4.00    N/A     N/A  

Tier 1 capital to average assets

          

Isabella Bank

   88,901     7.62    46,653     4.00    58,316     5.00  

Consolidated

   99,192     8.42    47,116     4.00    N/A     N/A  

NOTE 17 — BENEFIT PLANS

401(k) Plan

The Corporation has a 401(k) plan in which substantially all employees are eligible to participate. Employees may contribute up to 50% of their compensation subject to certain limits based on federal tax laws. The Corporation makes a 3.0% safe harbor contribution for all eligible employees and matching contributions equal to 50% of the first 4.0% of an employee’s compensation contributed to the Plan during the year. Employees are 100% vested in the safe harbor contributions and are 0% vested through their first two years of employment and are 100% vested after 6 years of service for matching contributions. For 2011, 2010 and 2009, expenses attributable to the Plan were $652, $625, and $617, respectively.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

Note 17 —Employee Benefit Plans
Defined Benefit Pension Plan

The Corporation has a non-contributory defined benefit pension plan covering substantially all of its employees. In December 2006, the Board of Directors voted to curtail the defined benefit plan effective March 1, 2007. The effect of the curtailment, which was recognizedcurtailed in the first quarter of 2007, suspended the current participant’s accrued benefits as of March 1, 2007 and limited participation in the plan to eligible employees as of December 31, 2006.2007. Due to the curtailment, future salary increases will not be considered and the benefits are based on years of service and the employees’employees' five highest consecutive years of compensation out of the last ten years of service rendered through March 1, 2007. As a result of the curtailment, the Corporation does not anticipate contributing to the plan in the near future.

The curtailment resulted in a reduction in 2007 of $2,939 in the projected benefit obligation, which served to reduce unrecognized net actuarial loss of $2,939, a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss.
Subsequent to the decision to curtail the defined benefit plan, the Corporation decided to increase the contributions to the Corporation’s 401(k) plan effective January 1, 2007 (see “Other Employee Benefit Plans” on page 52).

Changes in the projected benefit obligation and plan assets during each year, the funded status of the plan, and the net amount recognized on the Corporation’sCorporation's consolidated balance sheets using an actuarial measurement date of December 31, are summarized as follows during the years ended December 31:

         
  2008  2007 
 
Change in benefit obligation        
Benefit obligation, January 1 $8,206  $10,996 
Service cost     109 
Interest cost  503   489 
Actuarial loss  356   51 
Benefits paid, including plan expenses  (629)  (500)
Plan curtailment     (2,939)
         
Benefit obligation, December 31
  8,436   8,206 
         
Change in plan assets        
Fair value of plan assets, January 1  9,607   9,199 
Investment (loss) return  (1,309)  558 
Corporation contribution     350 
Benefits paid, including plan expenses  (629)  (500)
         
Fair value of plan assets, December 31
  7,669   9,607 
         
(Deficiency in) funded status at December 31
 $(767) $1,401 
         
         
  2008  2007 
 
Change in (accrued) prepaid pension benefit costs        
Prepaid (accrued) benefit cost at January 1 $1,401  $(1,797)
Contributions to the plan     350 
Net periodic benefit income (cost) for the year  152   (2)
Plan curtailment loss     (40)
Net change in unrecognized actuarial loss and prior service cost  (2,320)  2,890 
         
(Accrued) prepaid pension benefit cost at December 31
 $(767) $1,401 
         


49


   2011  2010 

Change in benefit obligation

   

Benefit obligation, January 1

  $9,660   $8,897  

Interest cost

   507    531  

Actuarial loss

   1,750    679  

Benefits paid, including plan expenses

   (583  (447
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Benefit obligation, December 31

   11,334    9,660  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Change in plan assets

   

Fair value of plan assets, January 1

   8,900    8,355  

Investment return

   148    945  

Contributions

   138    47  

Benefits paid, including plan expenses

   (583  (447
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Fair value of plan assets, December 31

   8,603    8,900  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Deficiency in funded status at December 31, included on the consolidated balance sheets in accrued interest payable and other liabilities

  $(2,731 $(760
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

   2011  2010 

Change in accrued pension benefit costs

   

Accrued benefit cost at January 1

  $(760 $(542

Contributions

   138    47  

Net periodic cost for the year

   (138  (193

Net change in unrecognized actuarial loss and prior service cost

   (1,971  (72
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Accrued pension benefit cost at December 31

  $(2,731 $(760
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Amounts recognized as a component of other comprehensive income (loss) consist of the following amounts during the years ended December 31:

   2011  2010  2009 

Change in unrecognized pension cost

  $(1,971 $(72 $374  

Tax effect

   671    25    (127
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net

  $(1,300 $(47 $247  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

The accumulated benefit obligation was $11,334 and $9,660 at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
During 2006,The Company has recorded the Corporation adopted the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 158,Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans(“SFAS No. 158”) and in accordance therewith reflected the under funded status of the plan onPlan in its consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2006. Prospectively, the Corporationsheets. The Company adjusts the underfunded status in a liability account to reflect the current funded status of the plan. Any gains or

losses that arise during the yearperiod but are not recognized as components of net periodic benefit cost are nowwill be recognized as a component of other comprehensive income (loss).

The adoption of SFAS No. 158 had no effect on the Corporation’s consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2006, and it will not affect the Corporation’s operating results in future periods.
The incremental effects of applying FASB Statement No. 158 on individual line items on the consolidated statement of financial position as of the December 31, 2006 implementation date are as follows:
             
  Before
  SFAS No. 158
  After
 
  Application of
  Application
  Application of
 
  SFAS No. 158  Adjustments  SFAS No. 158 
 
(Prepaid) accrued liability for pension benefits $(2,337) $4,134  $1,797 
Deferred income tax assets  2,030   1,406   3,436 
Total liabilities  792,581   1,797   794,378 
Accumulated other comprehensive loss  (759)  (2,728)  (3,487)
Total shareholders’ equity  118,477   (2,728)  115,749 
Amounts recognized as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss consist of:
             
  December 31 
  2008  2007  2006 
 
(Increase) reduction of unrecognized pension cost $(2,320) $2,890  $ 
Tax effect  788   (983)   
             
Net of tax amount  (1,532)  1,907    
             
Adjustment to initially apply FASB Statement No. 158        (4,134)
Tax effect        1,406 
             
Net of tax amount        (2,728)
             
Total
 $(1,532) $1,907  $(2,728)
             
The accumulated benefit obligation was $8,436 and $8,206 at December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The $4,134 adjustment to initially apply SFAS No. 158 in 2006 consisted primarily of previously unrecognized net actuarial losses.
The components of net periodic benefit cost and other pension related amounts recognized in other comprehensive income (loss) are as follows for the years ended December 31:
             
  2008  2007  2006 
 
Net periodic benefit (income) cost
            
Service cost on benefits earned for services rendered during the year $  $109  $637 
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation  503   489   607 
Expected return on plan assets  (659)  (628)  (555)
Amortization of unrecognized prior service cost        18 
Amortization of unrecognized actuarial net loss  4   32   232 
             
Net periodic benefit (income) cost
 $(152) $2  $939 
             


50


   2011  2010  2009 

Net periodic benefit cost

    

Interest cost on projected benefit obligation

  $507   $531   $504  

Expected return on plan assets

   (522  (491  (524

Amortization of unrecognized actuarial net loss

   153    153    169  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net periodic benefit cost

  $138   $193   $149  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Accumulated other comprehensive lossincome (loss) at December 31, 20082011 includes net unrecognized actuarial losses before income taxes of $3,564,$5,233, of which $170$253 is expected to be amortized into benefit cost during 2009.
Actuarial2012.

The actuarial assumptions used in determining the projected benefit obligation are as follows for the year ended December 31:

             
  2008  2007  2006 
 
Weighted average discount rate  6.10%  6.44%  6.00%
Rate of increase in future compensation  N/A   N/A   4.50%
Expected long-term rate of return  7.00%  7.00%  7.50%

   2011  2010  2009 

Discount rate

   4.22  5.36  5.87

Expected long-term rate of return

   6.00  6.00  6.00

The actualactuarial weighted average assumptions used in determining the net periodic pension costs are as follows for the year ended December 31:

             
  2008  2007  2006 
 
Discount rate  6.10%  6.44%  6.00%
Rate of compensation increase  N/A   N/A   4.50%
Expected long-term return on plan assets  7.00%  7.00%  7.00%

   2011  2010  2009 

Discount rate

   5.36  6.10  5.87

Expected long-term return on plan assets

   6.00  6.00  6.00

As a result of the curtailment of the Plan, there is no rate of compensation increase considered in the above assumptions.

The expected long term rate of return is an estimate of anticipated future long term rates of return on the Corporation’s plan assets as measured on a market value basis. Factors considered in arriving at this assumption include:

Historical longer term rates of return for broad asset classes.

Actual past rates of return achieved by the plan.

• Historical longer term rates of return for broad asset classes.
• Actual past rates of return achieved by the plan.
• The general mix of assets held by the plan.
• The stated investment policy for the plan.

The general mix of assets held by the plan.

The stated investment policy for the plan.

The selected rate of return is net of anticipated investment related expenses.

Plan Assets

The Corporation’s actual pension plan weighted-average asset allocationsoverall investment strategy is to moderately grow the portfolio by asset category are as follows at December 31:

         
Asset Category
 2008  2007 
 
Money market  2.5%  4.0%
Equity securities  52.8%  38.0%
Debt securities  44.7%  58.0%
         
Total  100.00%  100.00%
         
Asinvesting 50% of December 31, 2008, the plan held $188 (2.5%portfolio in equity securities and 50% in fixed income securities. This strategy is designed to generate a long term rate of total plan assets)return of funds in6.0%. Equity securities primarily consist of the S&P 500 Index with a money market account. The remaining fundssmaller allocation to the Small Cap and International Index. Fixed income securities are invested in two mutual funds managed by the plan’s investment advisors. These funds had $4,050Bond Market Index. The Plan has appropriate assets invested in equityshort term investments and $3,431 in debt securities as of December 31, 2008.
to meet near-term benefit payments.

The asset mix and the sector weighting of equitythe investments and debt issues to hold are based ondetermined by the pension committee, which is comprised of members of management of the Corporation. Consultations are held with a third party investment advisor retained by the Corporation to manage the plan.Plan. The Corporation reviews the performance of the advisor no less than annually.

The fair values of the Corporation’s pension plan assets by asset category were as follows as of December 31:

   2011   2010 

Description

  Total   (Level 2)   Total   (Level 2) 

Asset Category

        

Short-term investments

  $16    $16    $108    $108  

Common collective trusts

        

Fixed income

   4,357     4,357     4,470     4,470  

Equity investments

   4,230     4,230     4,322     4,322  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
  $8,603    $8,603    $8,900    $8,900  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

The following is a description of the valuation methodologies used for assets measured at fair value. There have been no changes in the methodologies used at December 31, 2011 and 2010:

Short-term investments:    Shares of a money market portfolio, which is valued using amortized cost, which approximates fair value.

Common collective trusts:    These investments are public investment securities valued using the net asset value (“NAV”) provided by a third party investment advisor. The NAV is quoted on a private market that is not active; however, the unit price is based on underlying investments which are traded on an active market.

The Corporation does not expect to makeanticipates contributions of $135 to the pension plan in 2009.


51

2012.


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Estimated future benefit payments are as follows for the next ten years:
     
Year
 Amount 
 
2009 $363 
2010  379 
2011  381 
2012  400 
2013  399 
Years 2014 – 2018 (total)  2,753 
Other Employee Benefit Plans

Year

  Amount 

2012

  $416  

2013

   415  

2014

   508  

2015

   554  

2016

   559  

Years 2017 — 2021

   3,155  

The Corporation maintains a nonqualified supplementary employee retirement plan (SERP)components of projected net periodic benefit cost are as follows for qualified officers to provide supplemental retirement benefits to each participant. Expenses related to this program for 2008, 2007, and 2006 were $206, $202, and $97, respectively, and are being recognized over the participants’ expected years of service. As a result of curtailing Isabella Bank Corporation’s defined benefit plan in March 2007, the Corporation established an additional SERP to maintain the benefit levels for all employees that were at least forty years old and had at least 15 years of service. The cost to provide this benefit was $128 and $120 for 2008 and 2007, respectively.

The Corporation maintains a non-leveraged employee stock ownership plan (ESOP) and a profit sharing plan which cover substantially all of its employees. Effective December 31, 2006, the ESOP plan was frozen to new participants. Contributions to the plans are discretionary and are approved by the Board of Directors and recorded as compensation expense. Expenses related to the plans for 2008, 2007, and 2006 were $0, $115, and $13, respectively. Total allocated shares outstanding related to the ESOP at December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006 were 271,520, 149,154, and 161,762, respectively, were included in the computation of dividends and earnings per share in each of the respective years and have not been adjusted for the 10% stock dividend paid February 29, 2008.
The Corporation maintains a self-funded medical plan under which the Corporation is responsible for the first $50 per year of claims made by a covered family. Medical claims are subject to a lifetime maximum of $5,000 per covered individual. Expenses are accrued based on estimates of the aggregate liability for claims incurred and the Corporation’s experience. Expenses were $2,110 in 2008, $1,804 in 2007 and $1,316 in 2006.
The Corporation offers dividend reinvestment, and employee and director stock purchase plans. The dividend reinvestment plan allows shareholders to purchase previously unissued Isabella Bank Corporation common shares. The stock purchase plan allows employees and directors to purchase Isabella Bank Corporation common stock through payroll deduction. The number of shares reserved for issuance under these plans are 635,000, with 314,856 shares unissued at December 31, 2008, as adjusted for the 10% stock dividend paid February 29, 2008. During 2008, 2007 and 2006, 78,994 shares were issued for $2,879, 63,233 shares were issued for $2,657 and 61,258 shares were issued for $2,459, respectively, in cash pursuant to these plans, exclusive of the effects of the 10% stock dividend paid February 29, 2008.
401(k) Plan
The Corporation has a 401(k) plan in which substantially all employees are eligible to participate. Employees may contribute up to 100% of their compensation subject to certain limits based on federal tax laws. The Corporation began making matching contributions equal to 25% of the first 3% of an employee’s compensation contributed to the plan in 2005. Employees are 0% vested through their first two years of employment and are 100% vested after 6 years of service.
As a result of the curtailment of the defined benefit plan noted above, the Corporation decided to increase the contributions to the Corporation’s 401(k) plan effective January 1, 2007. The enhancement includes an automatic 3.0% contribution for all eligible employees and matching contributions equal to 50% of the first 4.0% of an


52


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
employee’s compensation contributed to the Plan during the year. For the year ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, expenses attributable to the Plan were $543 and $439, respectively.
31:

   2012 

Interest cost on projected benefit obligation

  $470  

Expected return on plan assets

   (508

Amortization of unrecognized actuarial net loss

   291  
  

 

 

 

Net periodic benefit cost

  $253  
  

 

 

 

Equity Compensation Plan

Pursuant to the terms of the Isabella Bank Corporation and Related Companies Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors (the “Directors Plan”), directors of the Corporation and its subsidiaries are required to defer at least 25% of their earned board fees tointo the Directors Plan. The fees are converted toon a quarterly basis into the shares of the Corporation's common stock units based on the fair market value of a share of common stock as of the relevant valuation date. Stock credited to a participant’sparticipant's account is eligible for stock and cash dividends as declared. Upon retirement from the board or the occurrence of certain other events, the participant is eligible to receive a lump-sum, in-kind, distribution of all of the stock that is then in his or her account, and any unconverted cash will be converted to and rounded up to whole shares of stock and distributed, as well. The Directors Plan as modified does not allow for cash settlement, and therefore, such share-based payment awards qualify for classification as equity. All authorized but unissued shares of common stock are eligible for issuance under thisthe Directors Plan. The Corporation may also purchase shares of common stock fromon the open market to meet its obligations under the Directors Plan. Under the Plan, the

The Corporation was to issue $3,766 in dollar value of common stock or 186,766 shares and $3,772 or 198,939 shares as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively as adjusted for the 10% stock dividend paid on February 29, 2008, pursuant to the antidilution provision required by the Plan.

On December 17, 2008, the Corporation establishedmaintains a Rabbi Trust effective as of July 1, 2008, to fund the Directors Plan. A Rabbi Trust is an irrevocable grantor trust to which the Corporation may contribute assets for the limited purpose of funding a nonqualified deferred compensation plan. Although the Corporation may not reach the assets of the Rabbi Trust (“Trust”) for any purpose other than meeting its obligations under the plan,Directors Plan, the assets of the trustTrust remain subject to the claims of the Corporation’sCorporation's creditors and are included in the consolidated financial statements. The Corporation may contribute cash or common stock to the trustTrust from time to time for the sole purpose of funding the Directors Plan. The trustTrust will use any cash that the Corporation contributed to purchase shares of the Corporation’sCorporation's common stock on the open market through the Corporation’sCorporation's brokerage services department.
Since July 1, 2008,

The components of shares eligible to be issued under the Directors Plan were as follows as of December 31:

   2011   2010 
   Eligible   Fair   Eligible   Fair 
   Shares   Value   Shares   Value 

Unissued

   201,438    $4,774     191,977    $3,321  

Shares held in Rabbi Trust

   16,585     393     32,686     565  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   218,023    $5,167     224,663    $3,886  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Other Employee Benefit Plans

The Corporation maintains two nonqualified supplementary employee retirement plans to provide supplemental retirement benefits to specified participants. Expenses related to these programs for 2011, 2010, and 2009 were $444, $363, and $343, respectively, and are being recognized over the participants' expected years of service.

The Corporation maintains a non-leveraged employee stock ownership plan (“ESOP”) and a profit sharing plan which was frozen to new participants on December 31, 2006. Contributions to the plans are discretionary and are approved by the Board of Directors and recorded as compensation expense. During 2009, the Board of Directors approved a contribution of $50 to the ESOP. The Corporation made no contributions in 2010 or 2011. Compensation cost related to the plans for 2011, 2010, and 2009 were $20, $0, and $50, respectively. Total allocated shares outstanding related to the ESOP at December 31, 2011, 2010, and 2009 were 246,404, 246,419, and 271,421, respectively. Such shares are included in the computation of dividends and earnings per share in each of the respective years.

The Corporation maintains a self-funded medical plan under which the Corporation has transferred $249is responsible for the first $50 per year of cashclaims made by a covered family. Medical claims are subject to a lifetime maximum of $5,000 per covered individual. Expenses are accrued based on estimates of the Rabbi Trust. Asaggregate liability for claims incurred and the Corporation's experience. Expenses were $2,045 in 2011, $2,101 in 2010 and $2,155 in 2009.

The Corporation maintains the Isabella Bank Corporation Stockholder Dividend Reinvestment Plan and Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “Dividend Reinvestment Plan”). The dividend reinvestment feature of December 31, 2008, the TrustDividend Reinvestment Plan allows shareholders to purchase previously unissued Isabella Bank Corporation common shares using dividends paid on shares held 5,248in the plan. The employee stock purchase feature of the Dividend Reinvestment Plan allows employees and directors to purchase Isabella Bank Corporation common stock through payroll deduction. The shareholder stock purchase feature of the Dividend Reinvestment Plan enables existing shareholders to purchase additional shares of the Corporation’s common stock directly from the Corporation. The number of shares reserved for settlement.

Note 18 —Comprehensive Income (Loss)
issuance under these plans were 885,000, with 197,719 shares unissued at December 31, 2011. During 2011, 2010 and 2009, 115,359, 124,904, and 126,874 shares were issued for $2,192, $2,203, and $2,396, respectively, in cash pursuant to these plans.

NOTE 18 — ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

Comprehensive income (loss) includes net income as well as unrealized gains and losses, net of tax, on available-for-sale investment securities owned and changes in the funded status of the Corporation’s defined benefit pension plan, which are excluded from net income. Unrealized investment securities gains and losses and changes in the funded status of the pension plan, net of tax, are excluded from net income, and are reflected as a

direct charge or credit to shareholders’ equity. Comprehensive income (loss) and the related components are disclosed in the accompanying consolidated statements of comprehensive income for each of the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007,2011, 2010, and 2006.

2009.

The following is a summary of the components comprising the balance of accumulated other comprehensive lossincome (loss) reported on the consolidated balance sheets as of December 31 (presented net of tax):

         
  2008  2007 
 
Unrealized gains on available-for-sale investment securities $(3,216) $555 
Unrecognized pension costs  (2,353)  (821)
         
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
 $(5,569) $(266)
         


53


   2011  2010 

Unrealized gains on available-for-sale investment securities

  $5,942   $444  

Unrecognized pension costs

   (3,453  (2,153
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)

  $2,489   $(1,709
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

NOTE 19 — RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Note 19 —Related Party Transactions
In the ordinary course of business, the BankCorporation grants loans to principal officers and directors and their affiliates (including their families and companies in which they have 10% or more ownership). Annual activity during the years ended December 31 consisted of the following:
         
  2008  2007 
 
Beginning balance $10,461  $10,749 
New loans  3,488   8,720 
Repayments  (9,938)  (9,008)
         
Ending Balance $4,011  $10,461 
         

   2011  2010 

Balance, beginning of year

  $4,347   $4,142  

New loans

   1,800    3,038  

Repayments

   (2,419  (2,833
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balance, ending of year

  $3,728   $4,347  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total deposits of these principal officers and directors and their affiliates amounted to $8,317$7,664 and $10,526$11,556 at December 31, 20082011 and 2007,2010, respectively. In addition, Isabella Bank Corporation’s Employee Stock Ownership Plan (Note 17) held deposits with the Bank aggregating $370$275 and $928,$254, respectively, at December 31, 20082011 and 2007.

Note 20 —2010.

NOTE 20 — FAIR VALUE

Estimated Fair Values of Financial Instruments Not Recorded at Fair Value

In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159,The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilitiesin their Entirety on a Recurring Basis(“SFAS No. 159”). SFAS No. 159 expands

Disclosure of the estimated fair values of financial instruments, which differ from carrying values, often requires the use of fair value accounting but doesestimates. In cases where quoted market values in an active market are not affect existing standards which require assets or liabilities to be carried at fair value. Under SFAS No. 159,available, the Corporation may electuses present value techniques and other valuation methods to measure manyestimate the fair values of its financial instrumentsinstruments. These valuation methods require considerable judgment and certain other assets and liabilities at fair value (“fair value option” — FVO). The fair value measurement option is not allowable for deposit or withdrawable on demand liabilities. If the useresulting estimates of fair value is elected, any upfront costscan be significantly affected by the assumptions made and fees related to the instrument must be recognized in earningsmethods used.

The carrying amount and cannot be deferred, e.g., debt issue costs. Theestimated fair value election is irrevocable and is generally made on aninstrument-by-instrument basis, even if the Corporation has similarof financial instruments that it elects not to measure based on fair value. At the adoption date, unrealized gains and losses on existing items for which fair value has been elected are reported as a cumulative adjustment to beginning retained earnings as of January 1, 2007. Subsequent to the adoption of SFAS No. 159, changes in fair value are recognized in earnings. Although SFAS No. 159 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007 and would have been required to be adopted by Isabella Bank Corporation in the first quarter of fiscal 2008, Isabella Bank Corporation elected to early adopt SFAS No. 159 effective January 1, 2007, the impact of which is detailed in the table below.

As shown in the following table, the Corporation elected to transfer $77,839 of its $213,450 available-for-sale securities investment portfolio to trading status to facilitate more active trading of these securities. In determining which available-for-sale securities to transfer, the Corporation considered interest rates, duration, marketability, and balance sheet management strategies. The securities transferred included obligations of US Government Agencies, variable rate Federal National Mortgage Association and Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation mortgage backed securities, taxable municipal bonds, and a limited number of tax exempt bonds.


54


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
The Corporation also elected to report $7,256 of long-term, relatively high interest rate, Federal Home Loan Bank advances at their fair value upon the early adoption of SFAS No. 159 to provide a hedge against significant movement in interest rates.
             
  Balance Sheet
  Net Gain/
  Balance Sheet
 
  1/1/2007 Prior to
  (Loss ) Upon
  1/1/2007 After
 
  Adoption of FVO  Adoption of FVO  Adoption of FVO 
 
Investment securities $79,198  $(1,359) $77,839 
FHLB borrowings included in other borrowed funds  (7,256)  (232)  (7,488)
             
Pretax cumulative loss effect of adoption of the fair value option      (1,591)    
Increase in deferred tax asset      541     
Cumulative loss effect of adoption of the fair value option (charged as a reduction to retained earnings as of January 1, 2007)     $(1,050)    
             
The Corporation utilizes fair value measurements to record fair value adjustments to certain assets and liabilities and to determine fair value disclosures. Securities available-for-sale, trading securities, derivatives and certain liabilities are recorded at fair value in their entirety on a recurring basis. Additionally, from time to time,basis on the Corporation may be required to recordCorporation’s consolidated balance sheets are as follows as of December 31:

   2011   2010 
   Estimated   Carrying   Estimated   Carrying 
   Fair Value   Value   Fair Value   Value 

ASSETS

  

Cash and demand deposits due from banks

  $28,590    $28,590    $18,109    $18,109  

Certicates of deposit held in other financial institutions

   8,977     8,924     15,908     15,808  

Mortgage loans available-for-sale

   3,252     3,205     1,182     1,182  

Net loans

   756,802     737,916     734,634     722,931  

Accrued interest receivable

   5,848     5,848     5,456     5,456  

Equity securities without readily determinable fair values

   17,189     17,189     17,564     17,564  

Originated mortgage servicing rights

   2,374     2,374     2,673     2,667  

LIABILITIES

  

Deposits without stated maturities

   476,627     476,627     424,978     424,978  

Deposits with stated maturities

   499,644     481,537     454,332     452,361  

Borrowed funds

   222,538     210,894     190,180     184,494  

Accrued interest payable

   967     967     1,003     1,003  

Financial Instruments Recorded at Fair Value

The table below presents the recorded amount of assets and liabilities measured at fair value other assets on a nonrecurring basis, such as loans held-for-sale, loans held for investment in foreclosed assets, mortgage servicing rights and certain other assets and liabilities. These nonrecurring fair value adjustments typically involve the application of lower of cost or market accounting or write-downs of individual assets.

Fair Value Hierarchy
Under SFAS 157, the Corporation groups assets and liabilities at fair value into three levels, based on the markets in which the assets and liabilities are traded and the reliability of the assumptions used to determine fair value. These levels are:
• Level 1: Valuation is based upon quoted prices for identical instruments traded in active markets.
• Level 2: Valuation is based upon quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active, and model-based valuation techniques for which all significant assumptions are observable in the market.
• Level 3: Valuation is generated from model-based techniques that use at least one significant assumption not observable in the market. These unobservable assumptions reflect estimates of assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability.
December 31:

  2011  2010 

Description

 Total  (Level 1)  (Level 2)  (Level 3)  Total  (Level 2)  (Level 3) 

Recurring items

       

Trading securities

       

States and political subdivisions

 $4,710   $    4,710   $   $5,837   $5,837   $  

Available-for-sale investment securities

       

Government-sponsored enterprises

  397        397        5,404    5,404      

States and political subdivisions

  174,938        174,938        169,717    169,717      

Auction rate money market preferred

  2,049        2,049        2,865        2,865  

Preferred stock

  5,033    5,033            6,936        6,936  

Mortgage-backed

  143,602        143,602        102,215    102,215      

Collateralized mortgage obligations

  99,101        99,101        43,587    43,587      
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total available-for-sale investment securities

  425,120    5,033    420,087        330,724    320,923    9,801  

Borrowed funds

  5,242        5,242        10,423    10,423      

Nonrecurring items

       

Impaired loans

  25,250         25,250    12,048        12,048  

Originated mortgage servicing rights

  2,374        2,374        2,667    2,667      

Foreclosed assets

  1,876        1,876        2,067    2,067      
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
 $464,572   $5,033   $434,289   $25,250   $363,766   $341,917   $21,849  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Percent of assets and liabilities measured at fair value

   1.08  93.48  5.44   93.99  6.01
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Following is a description of the valuation methodologies and key inputs used forto measure financial assets and liabilities recorded at fair value.

value, as well as a description of the methods and significant assumptions used to estimate fair value disclosures for financial instruments not recorded at fair value in their entirety on a recurring basis. For financial assets and liabilities recorded at fair value, the description includes an indication of the level of the fair value hierarchy in which the assets or liabilities are classified.

Cash and demand deposits due from banks:

The carrying amounts of cash and short term investments, including Federal funds sold, approximate fair values.

Certificates of deposit held in other financial institutions:

Interest bearing balances held in unaffiliated financial institutions include certificates of deposit and other short term interest bearing balances that mature within 3 years. Fair value is determined using prices for similar assets with similar characteristics.

Investment Securities:securities:

Investment securities are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. FairLevel 1 fair value measurement is based upon quoted prices if available.for identical instruments. Level 2 fair value measurement is based upon quoted prices for similar instruments. If quoted prices are not available, fair values are measured using independent pricing models or other model-basedmodel based valuation techniques such as the present value of future cash flows, adjusted for the security’s credit rating, prepayment assumptions and other factors such as credit loss and liquidity assumptions. Level 1 securities include those traded on an active exchange, such as the New York Stock Exchange, U.S. Treasury securities that are traded by dealers or brokers in active over-the-counter markets, mortgage-backed securities issued by government-sponsored entities and money market funds. Level 2 securities include municipal bonds issued by government sponsored enterprises, states and corporate debtpolitical subdivisions, mortgage-backed securities, in active markets. collateralized mortgage obligations issued by government sponsored enterprises, and auction rate money market preferred securities. The values for Level 1 and Level 2 investment securities are generally obtained from an independent third party. On a quarterly basis, management compares the values provided to alternative pricing sources.

Securities classified as Level 3 includein 2010 included securities in less liquid markets


55


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
including illiquid markets in some instances, and include certain municipal securities and money market preferred auction rate securities.
The Corporation has invested $11,000 inincluded auction rate money market preferred investment security instruments, which are classified as available-for-sale securities and reflected at fair value. Due to recent events and uncertainty in credit markets, these investments have become illiquid.
preferred stocks. Due to the current illiquiditylimited trading of these securities these assets were classified as Level 3 during 2008. The fair values of these securities were estimated utilizing2010, the Corporation utilized a discounted cash flow analysis or other type of valuation adjustment methodology as ofto determine fair values on December 31, 2008. These analyses consider, among other factors, the collateral underlying the security investments,2010. This analysis considered the creditworthiness of the counterparty, the timing of expected future cash flows, estimatesthe current volume of trading activity, and recent trade prices. The discount rates used were determined by using the next timeinterest rates of similarly rated financial institution debt based on the security is expectedweighted average of a range of terms for corporate bond interest rates, which were obtained from published sources and ranged from 3.90% to 6.90% as of December 31, 2010. During 2011, the markets for these securities have normalized and established regular trading patterns. As a successfulresult of this normalization, the Corporation measured preferred stocks with fair values of $5,033 utilizing Level 1 inputs and auction andrate money market preferred securities with fair values of $2,049 utilizing Level 2 inputs based on the Corporation’s positive intent and ability to hold suchtrade price of similar securities until credit markets improve, as describedof December 31, 2011.

The table below represents the activity in Note 4.

auction rate money market preferred available-for-sale investment securities measured with Level 3 inputs on a recurring basis for the years ended December 31:

   2011  2010 

Level 3 inputs — January 1

  $2,865   $2,973  

Transfer to Level 2 inputs

   (2,049    

Net unrealized losses on available-for-sale investment securities

   (816  (108
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Level 3 inputs — December 31

  $   $2,865 ��
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

The table below represents the activity in preferred stock available-for-sale investment securities measured with Level 3 inputs on a recurring basis for the years ended December 31:

   2011  2010 

Level 3 inputs — January 1

  $6,936   $7,054  

Calls

   (1,000    

Transfer to Level 1 inputs

   (5,033    

Net unrealized losses on available-for-sale investment securities

   (903  (118
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Level 3 inputs — December 31

  $   $6,936  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Loans Available-for-Sale:Mortgage loans available-for-sale:

Loans available for sale

Mortgage loans available-for-sale are carried at the lower of cost or marketfair value. The fair value of mortgage loans held-for-sale isavailable-for-sale are based on what price secondary markets are currently offering for portfolios with similar characteristics. As such, the CompanyCorporation classifies loans subjected to nonrecurring fair value adjustments as Level 2.

Loans:

For variable rate loans with no significant change in credit risk, fair values are based on carrying values. Fair values for fixed rate loans are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses, using interest rates currently being offered for loans with similar terms to borrowers of similar credit quality. The resulting amounts are adjusted to estimate the effect of changes in the credit quality of borrowers since the loans were originated.

The Corporation does not record loans at fair value on a recurring basis. However, from time to time, a loan is considered impaired and ana specific allowance for loan losses ismay be established. Loans for which it is probable that payment of interest and principal will not be made in accordance withsignificantly different than the contractual terms of the original loan agreement are considered impaired. Once a loan is identified as individually impaired, management measures impairment in accordance with SFAS 114,Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan, (SFAS 114).the estimated impairment. The fair value of impaired loans is estimated using one of several methods, including collateral value, market value of similar debt, enterprise value, liquidation value, andor discounted cash flows. Those impaired loans not requiring an allowance represent loans for which the fair value of the expected repayments or collateral exceed the recorded investments in such loans. At December 31, 2008,

The Corporation reviews the net realizable values of the underlying collateral for collateral dependent impaired loans were evaluated based on at least a quarterly basis for all loan types. To determine the faircollateral value, management utilizes independent appraisals, broker price opinions, or internal evaluations. These valuations are reviewed to determine whether an additional discount should be applied given the age of market information that may have been considered as well as other factors such as costs to carry and sell an asset if it is determined that the collateral will be liquidated in connection with the ultimate settlement of the loan. The Corporation uses these valuations to determine if any charge offs or specific reserves are necessary. The Corporation may obtain new valuations in certain circumstances, including when there has been significant deterioration in the condition of the collateral, if the foreclosure process has begun, or based onif the net present value of their expected cash flows. existing valuation is deemed to be outdated.

Impaired loans where an allowance is established based on the fairnet realizable value of collateral require classification in the fair value hierarchy. When the fair value of the collateral is based on an observable market price or a current appraisal value, the Corporation records the loan as nonrecurring Level 2. When a current appraised value is not available or management determines the fair value of the collateral is further impaired below the appraised value, and there is no observable market price, or the impairment is determined using the net present value of the expected cash flows, the Corporation classifiesrecords the impaired loanloans as nonrecurring Level 3.

Foreclosed Assets:Accrued interest:

Upon transfer from

The carrying amounts of accrued interest approximate fair value.

Goodwill and other intangible assets:

Acquisition intangibles and goodwill are evaluated for potential impairment on at least an annual basis. Goodwill is typically qualitatively evaluated to determine if it is more likely than not that the loan portfolio, foreclosedcarrying balance is impaired. If it is determined that the carrying balance of goodwill is more likely than not to be impaired,

management performs a cash flow valuation to determine the extent of the potential impairment. Acquisition intangibles are tested for impairment with a cash flow valuation. This valuation method requires a significant degree of management judgment. In the event the projected undiscounted net operating cash flows for these intangible assets are adjusted to and subsequently carried atless than the lower of carrying value, orthe asset is recorded at fair value less costsas determined by the valuation model. If the testing resulted in impairment, the Corporation would classify goodwill and other acquisition intangibles subjected to sell. Fair value is based upon independent market prices, appraised values of the collateral or management’s estimation of the value of the collateral. When a current appraised value is not available or management determines thenonrecurring fair value ofadjustments as Level 3. For the collateral is further impaired below the appraised valueyears ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, there iswere no observable market price, the Corporation classifies the foreclosed asset as nonrecurring Level 3.

impairments recorded on goodwill and other acquisition intangibles.

Equity Securities Without Readily Determinable Fair Values:securities without readily determinable fair values:

The Corporation has investments in equity securities without readily determinable fair values as well as an investmentinvestments in a joint venture.ventures. The assets are individually reviewed for impairment on an annual basis, or more frequently if an indication of impairment exists, by comparing the carrying value to the estimated fair value. The lack of an independent source to validate fair value estimates, including the impact of future capital calls and transfer restrictions, is an inherent limitation in the valuation process. The Corporation classifies nonmarketable equity securities and its investmentinvestments in a joint ventureventures subjected to nonrecurring fair value adjustments as Level 3. During 2008For the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2007,2010, there were no impairments recorded on equity securities without readily determinable fair values.


56


Foreclosed assets:

Upon transfer from the loan portfolio, foreclosed assets are adjusted to and subsequently carried at the lower of carrying value or fair value less costs to sell. Net realizable value is based upon independent market prices, appraised values of the collateral, or management’s estimation of the value of the collateral and as such, the Corporation classifies foreclosed assets as a nonrecurring Level 2. When management determines that the net realizable value of the collateral is further impaired below the appraised value but there is no observable market price, the Corporation records the foreclosed asset as nonrecurring Level 3.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Mortgage Servicing Rights:Originated mortgage servicing rights:
Loan

Originated mortgage servicing rights are subject to impairment testing. A valuation model, which utilizes a discounted cash flow analysis using interest rates and prepayment speed assumptions currently quoted for comparable instruments and a discount rate determined by management, is used for impairment testing. If the valuation model reflects a value less than the carrying value, originated mortgage servicing rights are adjusted to fair value through a valuation allowance as determined by the model. As such, the Corporation classifies loan servicing rights subjectedsubject to nonrecurring fair value adjustments as Level 2.

Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets:Deposits:

Goodwill and identified intangible assets are subject to impairment testing. A projected cash flow valuation method is used in the completion of impairment testing. This valuation method requires a significant degree of management judgment. In the event the projected undiscounted net operating cash flows are less than the carrying value, the asset is recorded at fair value as determined by the valuation model. If the testing resulted in impairment, the Corporation would classify goodwill and other intangible assets subjected to nonrecurring fair value adjustments as Level 3. During 2008 and 2007, there were no impairments recorded on goodwill and other intangible assets.
Other Borrowed Funds:
The Corporation has elected to measure a portion of other borrowed funds at their fair value. These borrowings are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis, with the fair value measurement being based upon quoted prices. Changes in the fair value of these borrowings are included in noninterest income. As such, the Corporation classifies other borrowed funds as Level 1.
The table below represents the activity in Level 3 inputs measured on a recurring basis for the year ended December 31:
         
  2008  2007 
 
Level 3 inputs — January 1 $12,694  $13,723 
Purchases  2,307    
Maturities  (1,255)  (1,029)
Transfers of securities into level 3 due to changes in the observability of significant inputs (illiquid markets)  11,000    
Net unrealized losses on available-for-sale investment securities  (5,355)   
         
Level 3 inputs — December 31 $19,391  $12,694 
         
The tables below present the recorded amount of assets and liabilities measured at fair value on December 31:
                 
  2008 
Description
 Total  (Level 1)  (Level 2)  (Level 3) 
 
Recurring Items
                
Trading securities $21,775  $10,175  $11,600  $ 
Investment securities available for sale  246,455   89,507   137,557   19,391 
Mortgage loans available for sale  898      898    
Other borrowed funds  23,130   23,130       
Nonrecurring Items
                
Impaired loans  10,014         10,014 
Mortgage servicing rights  2,105      2,105    
Foreclosed assets  2,923      2,923    


57


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
                 
  2007 
Description
 Total  (Level 1)  (Level 2)  (Level 3) 
 
Recurring Items
                
Trading securities $25,064  $14,741  $10,323  $ 
Investment securities available for sale  213,127   57,871   142,562   12,694 
Mortgage loans available for sale  2,214      2,214    
Other borrowed funds  7,523   7,523       
Nonrecurring Items
                
Impaired loans  3,779         3,779 
Mortgage servicing rights  2,198      2,198    
Foreclosed assets  1,376      1,376    
The Corporation had 10.8% and 6.5% of Level 3 assets as a percentage of total assets and liabilities measured at fair value as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
The changes in fair value of assets and liabilities recorded at fair value through earnings on a recurring basis and changes in assets and liabilities recorded at fair value on a nonrecurring basis, for which impairment was recognized in the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, are summarized as follows:
                         
  Year Ended December 31 
  2008  2007 
  Trading
  Other
     Trading
  Other
    
  Gains and
  Gains and
     Gains and
  Gains and
    
Description
 (Losses)  (Losses)  Total  (Losses)  (Losses)  Total 
 
Recurring Items
                        
Trading securities $245  $  $245  $460  $  $460 
Other borrowed funds     (641)  (641)     (66)  (66)
Nonrecurring Items
                        
Impaired loans     (71)  (71)         
Mortgage servicing rights     (115)  (115)     (5)  (5)
Foreclosed assets     (231)  (231)     (109)  (109)
                         
          $(813)         $280 
                         
During 2008, primarily as a result of declines in the rates offered on new residential mortgage loans, the Corporation recorded impairment charges of $115 related to the carrying value of its mortgage servicing rights, in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 156. This decline in offering rates decreased the expected lives of the loans serviced and in turn decreased the value of the serving rights.
The impairment charges to foreclosed assets were the result of the real estate held declining in value subsequent to the properties being transferred to other real estate.
The activity in the trading portfolio of investment securities was as follows for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007:
         
  2008  2007 
 
Purchases $11,010  $7,654 
Sales, calls, and maturities  (14,544)  (62,248)
         
Total
 $(3,534) $(54,594)
         

58


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
The net loss on trading securities represents mark-to-market adjustments. Included in the net trading losses of $245 during 2008, was $262 of net trading gains on securities that were held in the Corporation’s trading portfolio as of December 31, 2008.
The activity in borrowings carried at fair value was as follows for years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007:
         
  2008  2007 
 
Issuances $15,000  $ 
Sales, calls, and maturities  (34)  (31)
         
Total
 $14,966  $(31)
         
Note 21 —Fair Values of Financial Instruments
The fair value of a financial instrument is the current amount that would be exchanged between willing parties, other than in a forced liquidation. Fair value is best determined based upon quoted market prices. However, in many instances, there are no quoted market prices for the Corporation’s various financial instruments. In cases where quoted market prices are not available, fair values are based on estimates using present value or other valuation techniques. Those techniques are significantly affected by the assumptions used, including the discount rate and estimates of future cash flows. Accordingly, the estimated amounts provided herein do not necessarily indicate amounts which could be realized in a current exchange. Furthermore, as the Corporation typically holds the majority of its financial instruments until maturity, it does not expect to realize all of the estimated amounts disclosed. The disclosures also do not include estimated fair value amounts for items which are not defined as financial instruments, but which have significant value. These include such items as core deposit intangibles, the future earnings of significant customer relationships and the value of other fee generating businesses. The Corporation believes the imprecision of an estimate could be significant.
The following methods and assumptions were used by the Corporation in estimating fair value disclosures for financial instruments.
Cash and cash equivalents:
The carrying amounts of cash and short-term instruments approximate fair values.
Investment securities:
Fair values for investment securities are based on quoted market prices, where available. If quoted market prices are unavailable, fair values are based on quoted market prices of comparable instruments or other model-based valuation techniques such as the present value of future cash flows, adjusted for the security’s credit rating, prepayment assumptions and other factors such as credit loss and liquidity assumptions.
Mortgage loans available for sale:
Fair values of mortgage loans available for sale are based on commitments on hand from investors or prevailing market prices.
Loans receivable:
For variable-rate loans that reprice frequently and with no significant change in credit risk, fair values are based on carrying values. Fair values for other loans (e.g. , real estate mortgage, agricultural, commercial, and installment) are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses, using interest rates currently being offered for loans with similar terms to borrowers of similar credit quality. The resulting amounts are adjusted to estimate the effect of declines, if any, in the credit quality of borrowers since the loans were originated. Fair values for non-performing loans are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses or underlying collateral values, where applicable.


59


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Mortgage servicing rights:
Fair value is determined using prices for similar assets with similar characteristics when applicable, or based upon discounted cash flow analyses.
Deposit liabilities:
Demand, savings, and money market deposits are, by definition, equal to the amount payable on demand at the reporting date (i.e., their carrying amounts). Fair values for variable rate certificates of deposit approximate their recorded carrying value. Fair values for fixed-ratefixed rate certificates of deposit are estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation that applies interest rates currently being offered on certificates to a schedule of aggregated expected monthly maturities on time deposits.

Short-term borrowings:Borrowed funds:

The carrying amounts of federal funds purchased, borrowings under overnight repurchase agreements, and other short-term borrowings maturing within ninety days approximate their fair values. FairThe fair values of the Corporation’s other short-term borrowingsborrowed funds are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses based on the Corporation’s current incremental borrowing rates for similar typesarrangements.

The Corporation has elected to measure a portion of borrowings arrangements.

Borrowings:
Theborrowed funds at fair values of the Corporation’s long-termvalue. These borrowings are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis, with the fair value measurement estimated using discounted cash flow analyses based on the Corporation’s current incremental borrowing arrangements. The carrying amounts of federal funds purchased and borrowings under repurchase agreements approximate their fair value. The fair values of other borrowings are estimated using discounted cash flow analysesanalysis based on the Corporation’s current incremental borrowing rates for similar types of borrowing arrangements.
Changes in the fair value of these borrowings are included in noninterest income. As such, the Corporation classifies other borrowed funds as Level 2.

Accrued interest:Commitments to extend credit, standby letters of credit and undisbursed loans:

The carrying amounts of accrued interest approximate fair value.
Derivative financial instruments:

Fair values for derivative loan commitments and forward loan sale commitments are based on fair values of the underlying mortgage loans and the probability of such commitments being exercised.

Off-balance-sheet credit-related instruments:
Fair values for off-balance-sheetoff balance sheet lending commitments are based on fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements, taking into consideration the remaining terms of the agreements and the counterparties’counterparties' credit standings. The Corporation does not charge fees for lending commitments; thus it is not practicable to estimate the fair value of these instruments.


60


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
The following sets forth the estimatedpreceding methods described may produce a fair value calculation that may not be indicative of net realizable value or reflective of future fair values. Furthermore, although the Corporation believes its valuation methods are appropriate and recorded carrying valuesconsistent with other market participants, the use of different methodologies or assumptions to determine the Corporation’sfair value of certain financial instruments could result in a different fair value measurement.

The changes in fair value of assets and liabilities recorded at fair value through earnings on a recurring basis and changes in assets and liabilities recorded at fair value on a nonrecurring basis, for which an impairment, or reduction of an impairment, was recognized in 2011 and 2010, are summarized as offollows:

   Year Ended December 31 
   2011  2010 

Description

 Trading
Gains and
(Losses)
  Other Gains
and (Losses)
  Total  Trading
Gains and
(Losses)
  Other Gains
and (Losses)
  Total 

Recurring items

      

Trading securities

 $(78 $   $(78 $(94 $   $(94

Borrowed funds

      181    181        227    227  

Nonrecurring items

      

Foreclosed assets

      (82  (82      (180  (180

Originated mortgage servicing rights

      (243  (243      1    1  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

 $(78 $(144 $(222 $(94 $48   $(46
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

The activity in borrowings which the Corporation has elected to carry at fair value was as follows for the years ended December 31:

                 
  2008  2007 
  Estimated
  Carrying
  Estimated
  Carrying
 
  Fair Value  Value  Fair Value  Value 
 
ASSETS
Cash and demand deposits due from banks $23,554  $23,554  $25,583  $25,583 
Trading securities  21,775   21,775   25,064   25,064 
Investment securities available for sale  246,455   246,455   213,127   213,127 
Mortgage loans available for sale  905   898   2,228   2,214 
Net loans  743,110   723,403   606,840   605,386 
Accrued interest receivable  6,322   6,322   5,948   5,948 
Mortgage servicing rights  2,105   2,105   2,198   2,198 
 
LIABILITIES
Deposits with no stated maturities  394,042   394,042   387,054   387,054 
Deposits with stated maturities  387,291   381,588   348,488   346,419 
Borrowed funds  230,130   222,350   91,897   92,887 
Accrued interest payable  1,334   1,334   1,284   1,284 
Note 22 —Parent Company Only Financial Information (Unaudited)

   2011  2010 

Borrowings carried at fair value — beginning of year

  $10,423   $17,804  

Paydowns and maturities

   (5,000  (7,154

Net change in fair value

   (181  (227
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Borrowings carried at fair value — December 31

  $5,242   $10,423  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Unpaid principal balance — December 31

  $5,000   $10,000  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

NOTE 21 — PARENT COMPANY ONLY FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Condensed Balance Sheets

         
  December 31 
  2008  2007 
 
ASSETS
Cash on deposit at subsidiary Bank $1,144  $14,265 
Securities available for sale  2,140   2,210 
Investments in subsidiaries  82,673   77,486 
Premises and equipment  2,043   3,637 
Other assets  52,096   26,309 
         
Total Assets
 $140,096  $123,907 
         
 
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Other liabilities $5,620  $827 
Shareholders’ equity  134,476   123,080 
         
Total Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity
 $140,096  $123,907 
         


61


    December 31 
   2011   2010 
ASSETS  

Cash on deposit at subsidiary Bank

  $1,474    $301  

Securities available for sale

   3,567     1,929  

Investments in subsidiaries

   106,463     94,668  

Premises and equipment

   1,916     1,952  

Other assets

   52,060     53,481  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

TOTAL ASSETS

  $165,480    $152,331  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY  

Other liabilities

  $10,697    $7,170  

Shareholders’ equity

   154,783     145,161  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

  $165,480    $152,331  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Condensed Statements of Income
                 
     Year Ended December 31 
     2008  2007  2006 
 
Income                
Dividends from subsidiaries     $5,800  $15,975  $4,025 
Interest income      88   177   305 
Management fee and other      1,011   1,517   1,280 
                 
Total income
      6,899   17,669   5,610 
Expenses      3,989   3,890   3,872 
                 
Income before income tax benefit and equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiaries      2,910   13,779   1,738 
Federal income tax benefit      905   773   825 
                 
       3,815   14,552   2,563 
Undistributed earnings (distributions in excess of earnings) of subsidiaries      286   (6,622)  4,438 
                 
Net income
     $4,101  $7,930  $7,001 
                 


62


    Year Ended December 31 
   2011   2010   2009 

Income

      

Dividends from subsidiaries

  $6,500    $6,250    $6,100  

Interest income

   128     72     77  

Management fee and other

   1,201     1,340     993  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total income

   7,829     7,662     7,170  

Expenses

      

Salaries and benefits

   2,267     2,286     2,112  

Occupancy and equipment

   370     356     430  

Audit and SOX compliance fees

   378     476     291  

Other

   1,089     932     1,074  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total expenses

   4,104     4,050     3,907  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Income before income tax benefit and equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiaries

   3,725     3,612     3,263  

Federal income tax benefit

   958     896     976  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
   4,683     4,508     4,239  

Undistributed earnings of subsidiaries

   5,527     4,537     3,561  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net income

  $10,210    $9,045    $7,800  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Condensed Statements of Cash Flows
             
  Year Ended December 31 
  2008  2007  2006 
 
Operating Activities
            
Net income $4,101  $7,930  $7,001 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash provided by operations            
Undistributed earnings of subsidiaries  (286)  6,622   (4,438)
Share based payment awards  603   758   470 
Depreciation  294   592   591 
Net amortization of investment securities  5   4   21 
Realized loss on sale of investment securities        8 
Deferred income taxes (benefit)  162   (165)  128 
Changes in operating assets and liabilities which provided (used) cash Interest receivable  1   (2)  29 
Other assets  (817)  (776)  (522)
Accrued interest and other expenses  583   (389)  138 
             
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
  4,646   14,574   3,426 
Investing Activities
            
Activity in available-for-sale securities            
Maturities, calls, and sales  110   595   6,650 
Purchases     (266)  (4,380)
Sales (purchases) of equipment and premises  1,300   (1,135)  (660)
Advances to subsidiaries  (11,927)  (50)  (8,394)
             
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities
  (10,517)  (856)  (6,784)
Financing Activities
            
Net increase in other borrowed funds  1,836       
Cash dividends paid on common stock  (4,873)  (4,304)  (3,775)
Proceeds from the issuance of common stock  2,476   2,657   2,459 
Common stock repurchased  (6,440)  (1,881)   
Common stock purchased for deferred compensation obligations  (249)      
             
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities
  (7,250)  (3,528)  (1,316)
             
(Decrease) Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents
  (13,121)  10,190   (4,674)
Cash and cash equivelants at beginning of year  14,265   4,075   8,749 
             
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Year
 $1,144  $14,265  $4,075 
             


63


   Year Ended December 31 
  2011  2010  2009 

OPERATING ACTIVITIES

   

Net income

 $10,210   $9,045   $7,800  

Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash provided by operations

   

Undistributed earnings of subsidiaries

  (5,527  (4,537  (3,561

Share-based payment awards

  615    650    677  

Depreciation

  123    147    163  

Net amortization of investment securities

  7    5    6  

Deferred income tax benefit

  (48  (172  (570

Changes in operating assets and liabilities which provided (used) cash

   

Other assets

  167    298    (748

Accrued interest and other liabilities

  757    1,883    517  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

NET CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES

  6,304    7,319    4,284  

INVESTING ACTIVITIES

   

Activity in available-for-sale securities

   

Maturities, calls, and sales

  585    110    110  

Purchases

  (3,000        

(Purchases) sales of equipment and premises

  (87  247    (466

Advances to subsidiaries

      (250    
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

NET CASH (USED IN) PROVIDED BY INVESTING ACTIVITIES

  (2,502  107    (356

FINANCING ACTIVITIES

   

Net increase (decrease) in other borrowed funds

  2,772    (1,550  700  

Cash dividends paid on common stock

  (5,770  (5,421  (5,256

Proceeds from the issuance of common stock

  2,302    2,208    2,479  

Common stock repurchased

  (1,507  (2,020  (2,056

Common stock purchased for deferred compensation obligations

  (426  (514  (767
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

NET CASH USED IN FINANCING ACTIVITIES

  (2,629  (7,297  (4,900
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS

  1,173    129    (972

Cash and cash equivelants at beginning of year

  301    172    1,144  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF YEAR

 $1,474   $301   $172  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

NOTE 22 — OPERATING SEGMENTS

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Note 23 —Operating Segments
In prior years, theThe Corporation’s reportable segments wereare based on legal entities that account for at least 10%10 percent of net operating results. In April 2007, the individual bank charters of Isabella Bank and FSB Bank were consolidated into one bank charter as a part of the Corporation’s strategy to increase efficiencies. Retail banking operations for 2008, 2007,2011, 2010, and 20062009 represent approximately 90% or greater of the Corporation’s total assets and operating results. As such, no additional segment information is presented.
Note 24 —Adjustments Affecting Fourth Quarter Results of Operations
In the fourth quarter of 2008, due to the increased deterioration of the overall credit quality of the Corporation’s loan portfolio as well as the increased uncertainty related to the overall stability of the economy, the Corporation recorded a provision for loan losses in the amount of $5,725, which contributed to a net operating loss of $2,041 for the three months ended December 31, 2008. Management does not believe this adjustment is attributable to conditions that were apparent in previous quarters. The aggregate effect of the $5,725 provision for loan losses ($3,779 net of tax) was to reduce net income per share by $0.50.


64


Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of OpearationsOperations

ISABELLA BANK CORPORATION FINANCIAL REVIEW

(All dollars in thousands)

The following is management’s discussion and analysis of the financial condition and results of operations for Isabella Bank Corporation (the “Corporation”).Corporation. This discussion and analysis is intended to provide a better understanding of the consolidated financial statements and statistical data included elsewhere in the Annual Report. The Corporation’s significant acquisitions of Greenville Community Financial

Executive Summary

Isabella Bank Corporation, as well as all other financial institutions in January 2008Michigan and Farwell State Savings Bank in October 2006 were accounted for as purchase transactions, and as such,across the related results ofentire country, continues to experience the negative impacts on its operations are included from the dates of acquisition. See “Note 2 — Business Combinations and Joint Venture Formation” in the accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in the report.

During 2008, as a result of a significant downturn in economy, the Corporation experienced significant increases in past due and nonaccrual loans. This increase in delinquenciespersistent weak economy. The current economic environment has led to dramatic increases in nethistorically high levels of loans charged off as well asand foreclosed asset and collection expenses.

In spite of the economic downturn that has occurred over the past few years, the Corporation continues to be profitable, with net income of $10,210 for the year ended December 31, 2011. Not only has the Corporation remained profitable, its loan quality also compares well to its peers as its ratio of nonperforming loans to total loans was 0.95% as of December 31, 2011 compared to 3.26% for all bank holding companies in the Corporation’s peer group as of September 30, 2011 (December 31, 2011 peer group ratios are not yet available). The Corporation’s interest margins also continue to be strong, as the net yield on interest earning assets (on a fully taxable equivalent basis) was 3.87% for the year ended December 31, 2011.

Recent Legislation

The Health Care and Education Act of 2010 and the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act could have a significant impact on the Corporation’s operating results in future periods. Aside from the potential increases in the Corporation’s health care costs, the implementation of the new rules and requirements is likely to require a substantial commitment from the Corporation’s management.

The Dodd-Frank Act is very broad and complex legislation that puts in place a sweeping new financial services framework that is likely to have significant regulatory and legal consequences and will likely impact the Corporation’s future operating results. Implementation of the Act will require compliance with numerous new regulations, which will increase compliance and documentation costs. For further discussionmore information, see the summary of the Dodd-Frank Act under the heading “Supervision and analysis, see below.

Regulation” in the Corporation’s 2011 annual report on Form 10-K.

Critical Accounting Policies:Other

The Corporation has not received any notices of regulatory actions as of February 16, 2012.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES:

The Corporation’s significant accounting policies are set forth in Note 1 of the Consolidated Financial Statements. Of these significant accounting policies, the Corporation considers its policies regarding the allowance for loan losses, acquisition intangibles, and the determination of the fair value and assessment of other-than-temporary impairment of investment securities to be its most critical accounting policies.

The allowance for loan losses requires management’s most subjective and complex judgment. Changes in economic conditions can have a significant impact on the allowance for loan losses and, therefore, the provision for loan losses and results of operations. The Corporation has developed appropriate policies and procedures for assessing the adequacyappropriateness of the allowance for loan losses, recognizing that this process requires a number of assumptions and estimates with respect to its loan portfolio. The Corporation’s assessments may be impacted in future periods by changes in economic conditions, and the discovery of information with respect to borrowers which is not known to management at the time of the issuance of the consolidated financial statements. For additional discussion concerning the Corporation’s allowance for loan losses and related matters, see the Provisiondetailed discussion to follow under the heading “Allowance for Loan Losses discussion below.

Losses”.

United States generally accepted accounting principles require that the Corporation determine the fair value of the assets and liabilities of an acquired entity, and record their fair value on the date of acquisition. The

Corporation employs a variety of measures in the determination of the fair value, including the use of discounted cash flow analysis, market appraisals, and projected future revenue streams. For certain items that management believes it has the appropriate expertise to determine the fair value, management may choose to use its own calculations of the value. In other cases, where the value is not easily determined, the Corporation consults with outside parties to determine the fair value of the identified asset or liability. Once valuations have been adjusted, the net difference between the price paid for the acquired entity and the value of its balance sheet, including identifiable intangibles, is recorded as goodwill. This goodwill is not amortized, but is testedevaluated for impairment on at least an annual basis.

The Corporation currently has both available-for-sale and trading investment securities that are carried at their fair value. Changes in the fair value of available-for-sale investment securities are included inas a component of other comprehensive income, while declines in the fair value of these securities below their cost that are other than temporaryother-than-temporary are reflected as realized losses.losses in the consolidated statements of income. The change in value of trading investment securities is included in current earnings.

Management evaluates available-for-sale securities for indications of losses that are considered other-than-temporary, if any, on a regular basis. The market values for available-for-sale and trading investment securities are typically obtained from outside sources and applied to individual securities within the portfolio. The fair values

Due to the limited trading of investmentcertain auction rate money market preferred securities with illiquid markets are estimated utilizingand preferred stocks during 2010, the Corporation utilized a discounted cash flow analysis to determine fair values on December 31, 2010. This analysis considered the creditworthiness of the counterparty, the timing of expected future cash flows, the current volume of trading activity, and recent trade prices. The discount rates used were determined by using the interest rates of similarly rated financial institution debt based on the weighted average of a range of terms for corporate bond interest rates, which were obtained from published sources and ranged from 3.90% to 6.90% as of December 31, 2010. During 2011, the markets for these securities have normalized and established regular trading patterns. As such, the Corporation determined the fair value for these securities based on quoted prices for identical securities, or other typebased on quoted prices for similar securities as of valuation adjustment methodology. These securities are also compared, when possible, to other securities with similar characteristics.


65December 31, 2011.


DISTRIBUTION OF ASSETS, LIABILITIES, AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

INTEREST RATE AND INTEREST DIFFERENTIAL

The following schedules present the daily average amount outstanding for each major category of interest earning assets, nonearning assets, interest bearing liabilities, and noninterest bearing liabilities for the last three years. This scheduleThese schedules also presents an analysis of interest income and interest expense for the periods indicated. All interest income is reported on a fully taxable equivalent (FTE) basis using a 34% federal income tax rate. Nonaccruing loans, for the purpose of the following computations, are included in the average loan amounts outstanding. Federal Reserve and Federal Home Loan Bank Equitystock holdings which are restricted are included in Other Assets.

                                     
  2008  2007  2006 
     Tax
  Average
     Tax
  Average
     Tax
  Average
 
  Average
  Equivalent
  Yield/
  Average
  Equivalent
  Yield/
  Average
  Equivalent
  Yield/
 
  Balance  Interest  Rate  Balance  Interest  Rate  Balance  Interest  Rate 
 
INTEREST EARNING ASSETS:
                                    
Loans $717,040  $49,674   6.93% $604,342  $43,808   7.25% $522,726  $36,575   7.00%
Taxable investment securities  108,919   5,433   4.99%  68,398   3,751   5.48%  123,316   4,948   4.01%
Nontaxable investment securities  121,220   7,218   5.95%  96,789   5,726   5.92%  75,712   4,423   5.84%
Trading account securities  26,618   1,305   4.90%  50,904   2,298   4.51%         
Federal funds sold  5,198   110   2.12%  6,758   342   5.06%  2,762   139   5.03%
Other  17,600   433   2.46%  7,143   317   4.44%  5,012   250   4.99%
                                     
Total earning assets
  996,595   64,173   6.44%  834,334   56,242   6.74%  729,528   46,335   6.35%
NON EARNING ASSETS:
                                    
Allowance for loan losses  (8,606)          (7,603)          (7,187)        
Cash and due from banks  18,582           20,588           24,351         
Premises and equipment  22,905           21,507           17,690         
Accrued income and other assets  83,626           56,805           35,792         
                                     
Total assets
 $1,113,102          $925,631          $800,174         
                                     
INTEREST BEARING LIABILITIES:
                                    
Interest bearing demand deposits $114,889   813   0.71% $109,370   1,880   1.72% $105,476   1,664   1.58%
Savings deposits  213,410   2,439   1.14%  188,323   4,232   2.25%  158,327   2,675   1.69%
Time deposits  393,190   16,621   4.23%  349,941   16,493   4.71%  301,593   12,825   4.25%
Other borrowed funds  145,802   5,733   3.93%  68,586   3,354   4.89%  53,256   2,568   4.82%
                                     
Total interest bearing liabilities
  867,291   25,606   2.95%  716,220   25,959   3.62%  618,652   19,732   3.19%
NONINTEREST BEARING LIABILITIES:
                                    
Demand deposits  95,552           80,128           73,650         
Other  6,633           10,037           15,908         
Shareholders’ equity  143,626           119,246           91,964         
                                     
Total liabilities and equity
 $1,113,102          $925,631          $800,174         
                                     
Net interest income (FTE)
     $38,567          $30,283          $26,603     
                                     
Net yield on interest earning assets (FTE)
          3.87%          3.63%          3.65%
                                     
accrued income and other assets.

   Year Ended December 31 
   2011  2010  2009 
   Average
Balance
  Tax
Equivalent
Interest
  Average
Yield/
Rate
  Average
Balance
  Tax
Equivalent
Interest
  Average
Yield/
Rate
  Average
Balance
  Tax
Equivalent
Interest
  Average
Yield/
Rate
 

INTEREST EARNING ASSETS

         

Loans

 $743,441   $45,463    6.12 $725,534   $46,794    6.45 $725,299   $47,706    6.58

Taxable investment securities

  235,437    6,941    2.95  160,514    5,271    3.28  119,063    4,712    3.96

Nontaxable investment securities

  136,356    7,847    5.75  120,999    7,095    5.86  121,676    7,217    5.93

Trading account securities

  5,087    286    5.62  8,097    436    5.38  17,279    856    4.95

Federal funds sold

                          842    1    0.12

Other

  37,539    506    1.35  45,509    479    1.05  27,433    376    1.37
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total earning assets

  1,157,860    61,043    5.27  1,060,653    60,075    5.66  1,011,592    60,868    6.02

NONEARNING ASSETS

         

Allowance for loan losses

  (12,522    (13,262    (12,334  

Cash and demand deposits due from banks

  20,195      18,070      18,190    

Premises and equipment

  24,397      24,624      23,810    

Accrued income and other assets

  97,265      92,845      86,376    
 

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

Total assets

 $1,287,195     $1,182,930     $1,127,634    
 

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

INTEREST BEARING LIABILITIES

         

Interest bearing demand deposits

 $152,530    189    0.12 $137,109    151    0.11 $116,412    146    0.13

Savings deposits

  192,999    488    0.25  169,579    391    0.23  177,538    399    0.22

Time deposits

  467,931    10,258    2.19  430,892    10,988    2.55  398,356    13,043    3.27

Borrowed funds

  198,828    5,268    2.65  188,512    5,674    3.01  193,922    6,251    3.22
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total interest bearing liabilities

  1,012,288    16,203    1.60  926,092    17,204    1.86  886,228    19,839    2.24

NONINTEREST BEARING LIABILITIES

         

Demand deposits

  113,726      102,812      94,408    

Other

  15,456      14,171      7,188    

Shareholders’ equity

  145,725      139,855      139,810    
 

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity

 $1,287,195     $1,182,930     $1,127,634    
 

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

Net interest income (FTE)

  $44,840     $42,871     $41,029   
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net yield on interest earning assets (FTE)

    3.87    4.04    4.06
   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Net Interest Income

The Corporation derives the majority of its gross income from interest earned on loans and investments, while its most significant expense is the interest cost incurred for funds used. Net interest income is the amount by which interest income on earning assets exceeds the interest cost of deposits and borrowings. Net interest income is influenced by changes in the balance and mix of assets and liabilities and market interest rates. Management exerts


66


some control over these factors; however, Federal Reserve monetary policy and competition have a significant impact. Interest income includes loan fees of $1,808$2,385 in 2008, $1,3302011, $2,196 in 2007,2010, and $1,172$1,963 in 2006.

2009. For analytical purposes, net interest income is adjusted to a “taxable equivalent” basis by adding the

income tax savings from interest on tax-exempttax exempt loans and securities, thus making year-to-yearyear to year comparisons more meaningful.

VOLUME AND RATE VARIANCE ANALYSIS

The following table details the dollar amount of changes in FTE net interest income for each major category of interest earning assets and interest bearing liabilities and the amount of change attributable to changes in average balances (volume) or average rates. The change in interest due to both volume and rate has been allocated to volume and rate changes in proportion to the relationship of the absolute dollar amounts of the change in each.

                         
  2008 Compared to 2007
  2007 Compared to 2006
 
  Increase (Decrease) Due to  Increase (Decrease) Due to 
  Volume  Rate  Net  Volume  Rate  Net 
 
CHANGES IN INTEREST INCOME:
                        
Loans $7,877  $(2,011) $5,866  $5,878  $1,355  $7,233 
Taxable investment securities  2,048   (366)  1,682   (2,647)  1,450   (1,197)
Nontaxable investment securities  1,454   38   1,492   1,246   57   1,303 
Trading account securities  (1,176)  183   (993)  2,298      2,298 
Federal funds sold  (66)  (166)  (232)  202   1   203 
Other  306   (190)  116   97   (30)  67 
                         
Total changes in interest income
  10,443   (2,512)  7,931   7,074   2,833   9,907 
CHANGES IN INTEREST EXPENSE:
                        
Interest bearing demand deposits  90   (1,157)  (1,067)  63   153   216 
Savings deposits  505   (2,298)  (1,793)  568   989   1,557 
Time deposits  1,924   (1,796)  128   2,189   1,479   3,668 
Other borrowings  3,146   (767)  2,379   749   37   786 
                         
Total changes in interest expense
  5,665   (6,018)  (353)  3,569   2,658   6,227 
                         
Net change in interest margin (FTE)
 $4,778  $3,506  $8,284  $3,505  $175  $3,680 
                         
The Corporation, as well as all other financial institutions, has experienced dramatic changes in interest rates in the last two years. Since September of 2007, the Federal Reserve Bank (“The Fed”) has lowered its target Fed Funds rate from 5.25% to its current level of 0.00% - 0.25%. The Fed’s actions are a result of significant weakening of the Nation’s economy.
The Corporation’s balance sheet was well positioned to protect interest margins in this decreasing rate environment and provided strong interest margin growth in 2008. Interest margins are likely to decrease in 2009 due to the following three factors:
• Based on the current economic conditions, management does not anticipate any changes in the target Fed Funds during 2009. As such, the Corporation does not anticipate significant, if any, changes in market rates. However, there is the potential for declines in rates earned on interest earning assets. Most of the potential declines would arise out of the Corporation’s investment portfolio, as securities with call dates during 2009 will most likely be called and the Corporation will be reinvesting those proceeds at significantly lower rates.
• The recent substantial decline in residential mortgage rates will also result in movement of the Corporation’s customers from its three and five year balloon mortgages to fixed rate products that are sold on the secondary market. The reinvestment of these proceeds at lower interest rates will adversely impact interest income.
• The Corporation experienced a significant increase in non-accrual loans in the fourth quarter of 2008. The increase is a direct result of a decline in residential housing market values, the inability of residential and commercial developers to sell and or lease property, and a significant increase in unemployment rates. The


67


   2011 Compared to 2010
Increase (Decrease) Due to
  2010 Compared to 2009
Increase (Decrease) Due to
 
   Volume  Rate  Net  Volume  Rate  Net 

CHANGES IN INTEREST INCOME:

       

Loans

  $1,136   $(2,467 $(1,331 $15   $(927 $(912

Taxable investment securities

   2,254    (584  1,670    1,453    (894  559  

Nontaxable investment securities

   886    (134  752    (40  (82  (122

Trading account securities

   (168  18    (150  (489  69    (420

Federal funds sold

               (1      (1

Other

   (93  120    27    205    (102  103  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total changes in interest income

   4,015    (3,047  968    1,143    (1,936  (793

CHANGES IN INTEREST EXPENSE:

       

Interest bearing demand deposits

   18    20    38    24    (19  5  

Savings deposits

   57    40    97    (18  10    (8

Time deposits

   894    (1,624  (730  1,002    (3,057  (2,055

Borrowed funds

   299    (705  (406  (171  (406  (577
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total changes in interest expense

   1,268    (2,269  (1,001  837    (3,472  (2,635
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net change in interest margin (FTE)

  $2,747   $(778 $1,969   $306   $1,536   $1,842  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

increase in non-accrual loans will decrease 2009 interest income as these loans will no longer be accruing interest income.
Net yield onDuring 2011, average interest earning assets increased by 0.24% when 2008$97,207. This increase resulted in $4,015 of additional interest income which exceeded the $3,047 decrease in interest income caused by declines in interest rates. Interest bearing liabilities increased $86,196 at a cost of $1,268 while the decline in rates, mostly those on time deposits and borrowed funds, decreased interest expense by $2,269. The diminished interest income earned on assets resulted in a 0.17% decline in the net interest yield. Management anticipates that net interest margin yield will decline slightly during 2012 due to the following factors:

Based on the current economic conditions, management does not anticipate any changes in the target Fed funds rate in the foreseeable future. As such, changes in market rates may be unlikely. However, it is compared to 2007. The primary reason for this increase waslikely that in early 2007, the Corporation as part of a balance sheet management strategy, extended the maturities of interest earning assets, which as interest rates declinedmay see declines in the latter half of 2007, had a positive impact on interest margins as the cost of funding sources decreased more rapidly than the rates earned on interest earning assets. Another contributing factor forassets as the increase in margins was a resultinterest rates on many types of the loan growth, primarily in higher yieldingloans including home equity lines of credit, residential balloon mortgages, variable rate commercial loans.

The above mentioned balance sheet reorganization strategy was accelerated by the Corporation’s election to early adopt Statementlines of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 159,The Fair Value Option for Financial Assetscredit, and Financial Liabilities,investment securities with acceptable credit and SFAS No. 157,Fair Value Measurements, effective January 1, 2007. The purpose of the early adoption of these standards was to not only provide the Corporation with an opportunity to accelerate the restructuring of its balance sheet, but also to better manage interest rate risk now andare currently priced at or below the Corporation’s current net yield on interest earning assets. Most of the potential declines would arise out of the Corporation’s investment portfolio as the majority of securities that are called or mature in 2012 will be reinvested at significantly lower rates.

Interest rates on residential mortgage loans remain at or near historical lows. This rate environment has led to strong consumer demand for fixed rate mortgage products which are generally sold to the secondary market. As a result, there has been a significant decline in balloon mortgages, which are held on the Corporation’s consolidated balance sheet. As these balloon mortgages have paid off, the proceeds from these loans have been reinvested (typically in the future.

Overall FTE netform of available-for-sale investment securities) at lower interest margin increased by $8,284 forrates which has adversely impacted interest income.

While the year ended December 31, 2008 as comparedCorporation’s liability sensitive balance sheet has allowed it to the same period in 2007. Changes in volume provided an additional $4,778 of net interest margin, while changesbenefit from decreases in interest rates, both earned and paid, provided an additional $3,506 of net interest margin. During 2008,it also makes the rates paid on interest bearing liabilities decreased by 0.67% while those earned on interest earning assets declined by only 0.30%.

Net FTE interest income increased $3,680 for the year ended December 31, 2007 when comparedCorporation sensitive to the same periodincreases in 2006. The net increase from the change in volume of interest earning assets and interest bearing liabilities was $3,505 in 2007. Net interest income increased $175 as a result of interest rate changes. During 2007, the rates paid on interest bearing liabilities increased 0.43%, while those earned on interest earning assets increased 0.39%. The decline in interest rate spread is a direct result of the continued use of high cost funding sources such as certificates of deposit and other borrowed funds. The increase in the cost of these deposits in relation to other sources is a result of continued competition for retail deposits.borrowing rates. As part

of the Corporation’s goal to minimize the potential negative impacts of possible increases in future interest rates, management has been, and continues to be, actively working to lengthen the terms of its interest bearing liabilities. This lengthening has increased the Corporation’s cost of funding, reducing net interest income in the short term.

ProvisionAllowance for Loan Losses

The provision for loan losses representsviability of any financial institution is ultimately determined by its management of credit risk. Loans outstanding represent the current period loan cost associated with maintaining an appropriateCorporation’s single largest concentration of risk. The allowance for loan losses as determined by management. Periodic fluctuations in the provision for loan losses result fromis management’s best estimates as to the adequacyestimation of the allowance for loan losses to absorb probable losses withininherent in the existing loan portfolio. The provision for loan losses for each period is further dependent upon many factors, including loan growth, net charge-offs, changes in the composition ofFactors used to evaluate the loan portfolio, delinquencies, assessment by management, third parties and banking regulatorsthus to determine the current charge to expense, include recent loan loss history, financial condition of the qualityborrowers, amount of the loan portfolio, the value of the underlying collateral on problemnonperforming and impaired loans, and the generaloverall economic conditions in our market areas.


68


and other factors. The following schedule shows the composition of the provision for loan losses and the allowance for loan losses.
                     
  Year Ended December 31, 
  2008  2007  2006  2005  2004 
 
Allowance for loan losses — January 1 $7,301  $7,605  $6,899  $6,444  $6,204 
Allowance of acquired bank  822      726       
Loans charged off                    
Commercial and agricultural  2,137   905   368   101   561 
Real estate mortgage  3,334   659   252   166    
Consumer  854   582   529   376   374 
                     
Total loans charged off
  6,325   2,146   1,149   643   935 
Recoveries                    
Commercial and agricultural  160   297   136   105   191 
Real estate mortgage  240   49   53      62 
Consumer  284   285   258   216   187 
                     
Total recoveries
  684   631   447   321   440 
                     
Net loans charged off  5,641   1,515   702   322   495 
Provision charged to income  9,500   1,211   682   777   735 
                     
Allowance for loan losses — December 31
 $11,982  $7,301  $7,605  $6,899  $6,444 
                     
Year to date average loans
 $717,040  $604,342  $522,726  $466,001  $437,438 
                     
Net loans charged off to average loans outstanding
  0.79%  0.25%  0.13%  0.07%  0.11%
                     
Total amount of loans outstanding
 $735,385  $612,687  $591,042  $483,242  $452,895 
                     
Allowance for loan losses as a % of loans
  1.63%  1.19%  1.29%  1.43%  1.42%
                     
During 2008, the Corporation experienced a significant increase in total loans charged off, primarily in the form of residential real estate mortgages; total loans charged off increased by $4,179 to $6,325. As a result of the increases in loans charged off, as well as local and regional economic uncertainties ofsummarizes the Corporation’s loan portfolio,chargeoff and recovery activity for the Corporation recorded a provision for loan loss in the amount of $5,725 in the fourth quarter of 2008.
The nationwide increase in residential mortgage loans past due and in foreclosures has received considerable attention by the Federal Government, the media, banking regulators, and industry trade groups. Based on information provided by The Mortgage Bankers Association, a substantial portion of the nationwide increases in both past dues and foreclosures are related to fixed and adjustable rate sub-prime mortgages. While the Corporation does not hold sub-prime mortgage loans, the difficulties experienced in the sub-prime market have adversely impacted the entire market, and thus the overall credit quality of the Corporation’s residential mortgage portfolio. The increase in troubled residential mortgage loans and a tightening of underwriting standards will most likely result in a continued increase in the inventory of unsold homes. The inventory of unsold homes has not reached these levels since the 1991 recession. The combination of all of these factors is expected to further reduce average home values and thus homeowner’s equity on a national level.
years ended December 31:

  2011  

 

 2010  

 

 2009  

 

 2008  

 

  2007 

Allowance for loan losses — January 1

 $12,373    $12,979    $11,982    $7,301     $7,605  

Allowance of acquired bank

                 822        

Loans charged off

          

Commercial and agricultural

  1,984     3,731     3,081     2,137      905  

Real estate mortgage

  2,240     2,524     2,627     3,334      659  

Consumer

  552     596     934     854      582  
 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

Total loans charged off

  4,776     6,851     6,642     6,325      2,146  

Recoveries

          

Commercial and agricultural

  461     453     623     160      297  

Real estate mortgage

  177     638     546     240      49  

Consumer

  314     297     377     284      285  
 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

Total recoveries

  952     1,388     1,546     684      631  
 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

Net loans charged off

  3,824     5,463     5,096     5,641      1,515  

Provision charged to income

  3,826     4,857     6,093     9,500      1,211  
 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

Allowance for loan losses —
December 31

 $12,375    $12,373    $12,979    $11,982     $7,301  
 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

Year to date average loans

 $743,441    $725,534    $725,299    $717,040     $604,342  
 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

Net loans charged off to average loans outstanding

  0.51%    0.75%    0.70%    0.79%     0.25% 
 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

Total amount of loans outstanding

 $750,291    $735,304    $723,316    $735,385     $612,687  
 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

Allowance for loan losses as a % of loans

  1.65%    1.68%    1.79%    1.63%     1.19% 
 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

The Corporation originates and sells fixed rate residential real estate mortgages to the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation.Corporation (Freddie Mac). The Corporation has not originated loans for either trading or its own portfolio that would be classified as sub prime,subprime, nor has it originated adjustable rate mortgages or financefinanced loans for more than 80% of market value unless insured by private third party insurance.

With increases

As shown in the preceding table, when comparing 2011 to 2010, net loans charged off to average loans and nonperforming loans as a percentage of total loans,decreased by $1,639. This improvement allowed the Corporation increased theto reduce its provision charged to income in 2008. This additional provision increased the


69


allowance for loans losses as a percentage of loans by 0.44% to 1.63%. The increaseloan losses. While there have been marked improvements in the level of net loans charged off, which has contributed to the Corporation’s ability to reduce its provision for loan losses, the overall local, regional and national economies have yet to show consistent improvement.

The Corporation allocates the allowance as a percentage of loans is the result of increases in charge offs in the current year, an increase in nonperforming loans, and the declines in the credit qualitythroughout its loan portfolio based on management’s assessment of the underlying risks associated with each loan portfolio. Management will continue to closely monitor its overallsegment. Management’s assessments include allocations based on specific impairment allocations, historical losses, internally assigned credit quality during 2009 to ensure thatratings, and past due and nonaccrual balances. A portion of the allowance for loan losses remains adequate.

Basedis not allocated to any one loan segment, but is instead a reflection of other qualitative risks within the Corporation’s loan portfolio.

For further discussion on management’s analysis,the allocation of the allowance for loan losses, of $11,982 is considered adequate as of December 31, 2008.

Allocation of thesee “Note 6 – Loans and Allowance for Loan Losses
The allowance for loan losses has been allocated accordingLosses” to the amount deemed to be reasonably necessary to reflect for the probability of losses being incurred within the following categories as of December 31:
                                         
  2008  2007  2006  2005  2004 
     % of Each
     % of Each
     % of Each
     % of Each
     % of Each
 
     Category
     Category
     Category
     Category
     Category
 
  Allowance
  to Total
  Allowance
  to Total
  Allowance
  to Total
  Allowance
  to Total
  Allowance
  to Total
 
  Amount  Loans  Amount  Loans  Amount  Loans  Amount  Loans  Amount  Loans 
 
Commercial and agricultural $3,632   50.7% $2,458   46.0% $2,687   43.3% $2,771   46.9% $2,634   42.3%
Real estate mortgage  3,832   43.4%  1,341   48.6%  1,367   50.9%  1,192   46.8%  1,463   50.5%
Consumer installment  1,736   4.5%  2,195   4.8%  2,434   5.1%  2,286   5.8%  1,606   6.6%
Impaired loans  2,065   1.4%  703   0.6%  594   0.7%  184   0.5%  304   0.6%
Unallocated  717   0.0%  604   0.0%  523   0.0%  466   0.0%  437   0.0%
                                         
Total
 $11,982   100.0% $7,301   100.0% $7,605   100.0% $6,899   100.0% $6,444   100.0%
                                         
Management has evaluated impaired loansCorporation’s consolidated financial statements.

Loans Past Due and believes the valuation allowance related to these loans to be adequate.

Nonperforming Assets
Loans are generally placed on nonaccrual status when they become 90 daysin Nonaccrual Status

Increases in past due unless they are well secured and in the process of collection. Whennonaccrual loans can have a loan is placedsignificant impact on nonaccrual status, any interest previously accrued and not collected is generally reversed from income or charged off against the allowance for loan losses. Loans are charged off whenTo determine the potential impact, and corresponding estimated losses, management determines that collection has become unlikely. Restructuredanalyzes its historical loss trends on loans are those where a concession has been granted on either principalpast due 30-89 days, 90 days or interest paidmore, and nonaccrual loans.

The following tables summarize the Corporation’s past due to financial difficultiesand nonaccrual loans as of the borrower. Other real estate owned (OREO) consists of real property acquired through foreclosure on the related collateral underlying defaulted loans.


70

December 31:


   Total Past Due and Nonaccrual 
   2011   2010   2009   2008   2007 

Commercial and agricultural

  $7,420    $9,606    $8,839    $13,958    $8,746  

Residential mortgage

   5,297     8,119     10,296     12,418     8,357  

Consumer installment

   186     309     460     956     617  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
  $12,903    $18,034    $19,595    $27,332    $17,720  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

   2011 
               

Total

Past Due

and

 
   Accruing Loans Past Due       
       90 Days       
   30-89 Days   or More   Nonaccrual   Nonaccrual 

Commercial and agricultural

  $2,149    $466    $4,805    $7,420  

Residential mortgage

   3,424     289     1,584     5,297  

Consumer installment

   181     5          186  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
  $5,754    $760    $6,389    $12,903  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

   2010 
               

Total

Past Due

and

 
   Accruing Loans Past Due       
       90 Days       
   30-89 Days   or More   Nonaccrual   Nonaccrual 

Commercial and agricultural

  $5,291    $175    $4,140    $9,606  

Residential mortgage

   6,339     310     1,470     8,119  

Consumer installment

   308     1          309  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
  $11,938    $486    $5,610    $18,034  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Troubled Debt Restructurings

The following table presents nonperforming assetssummarizes the Corporation’s troubled debt restructurings as of December 31:

  2011  2010  2009  2008  2007 
  Accruing
Interest
  Non-
accrual
  Total  Accruing
Interest
  Non-
accrual
  Total  Accruing
Interest
  Non-
accrual
  Total  Accruing
Interest
  Non-
accrual
  Total  Accruing
Interest
 

Current

 $16,125   $514   $16,639   $4,798   $499   $5,297   $2,754   $786   $3,540   $2,297   $1,355   $3,652   $517  

Past due 30-89 days

  1,614    429    2,043    277    26    303    107    904    1,011    268        268    115  

Past due 90 days or more

      74    74        163    163        426    426        630    630    53  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

 $17,739   $1,017   $18,756   $5,075   $688   $5,763   $2,861   $2,116   $4,977   $2,565   $1,985   $4,550   $685  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

The Corporation had no troubled debt restructurings in nonaccrual status as of December 31, 2007.

As a result of adopting the amendments in ASU No. 2011-02, the Corporation reassessed all loan restructurings that occurred on or after January 1, 2011 for identification as troubled debt restructurings (TDR’s). The Corporation identified as TDR’s certain loans for which the past five years:

Nonperforming Assets
                     
  Year Ended December 31, 
  2008  2007  2006  2005  2004 
 
Nonaccrual loans $11,175  $4,156  $3,444  $1,375  $1,900 
Accruing loans past due 90 days or more  1,251   1,727   1,185   1,058   702 
Restructured loans  4,550   685   697   725   686 
                     
Total nonperforming loans
  16,976   6,568   5,326   3,158   3,288 
Other real estate owned  2,770   1,376   562   122   40 
Repossessed assets  153             
                     
Total nonperperforming assets
 $19,899  $7,944  $5,888  $3,280  $3,328 
                     
Nonperforming loans as a% of total loans
  2.31%  1.07%  0.90%  0.65%  0.73%
                     
Nonperforming assets as a % of total assets
  1.75%  0.83%  0.65%  0.44%  0.49%
                     
Dueallowance for loan losses had previously been measured under a general allowance for loan losses methodology. Upon identifying those loans as TDR’s, the Corporation identified them as impaired. The amendments in ASU No. 2011-02 require prospective application of the impairment measurement guidance for those loans newly identified as impaired. The Corporation’s recorded investment in loans for which the allowance for credit losses was previously measured under a general allowance for credit losses methodology and are now impaired was $5,136, with a specific valuation allowance of $1,022 as of December 31, 2011.

The Corporation has taken aggressive actions to avoid foreclosures on borrowers who are willing to work with the aforementioned residential real estateCorporation in modifying their loans, thus making them more affordable. These loan modifications have allowed borrowers to develop a payment structure that will allow them to continue making payments in lieu of foreclosure. Troubled debt restructurings that have been placed in nonaccrual status may be placed back on accrual status after six months of continued performance.

Loan modifications are considered to be TDR’s when the modification results in terms outside of normal lending practices to a borrower who is experiencing financial difficulties.

Typical concessions granted include, but are not limited to:

1. Agreeing to interest rates below prevailing market rates for debt with similar risk characteristics.

2. Extending the amortization period beyond typical lending guidelines for debt with similar risk characteristics.

3. Forbearance of principal.

4. Forbearance of accrued interest.

To determine if a borrower is experiencing financial difficulties, inherentthe Corporation considers if:

1. The borrower is currently in default on any of their debt.

2. It is likely that the borrower would default on any of their debt if the concession was not granted.

3. The borrower’s cash flow was sufficient to service all of their debt if the concession was not granted.

4. The borrower has declared, or is in the market,process of declaring, bankruptcy.

5. The borrower is unlikely to continue as a going concern (if the entity is a business).

The following tables summarize concessions granted by the Corporation to borrowers experiencing financial difficulties in the year ended December 31:

   2011 
   Below Market
Interest Rate
   Below Market
Interest Rate
and
Extension of
Amortization Period
 
   Number
of
Loans
   Pre-
Modification
Recorded
Investment
   Number
of
Loans
   Pre-
Modification
Recorded
Investment
 

Commercial

        

Commercial real estate

   1    $408         $  

Commercial other

   38     9,932     4     2,643  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total commercial

   39     10,340     4     2,643  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Agricultural other

   8     1,321            

Residential mortgage

        

Senior liens

   19     2,161     17     1,754  

Consumer

        

Secured

   6     65     1     4  

Unsecured

             2     20  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total consumer

   6     65     3     24  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   72    $13,887     24    $4,421  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

The Corporation did not restructure any loans through the forbearance of principal or accrued interest during 2011.

The Corporation has increasedbeen successful in its efforts to identify potential problem loans. Residential real estaterestructure loans to reduce foreclosures. Of the 163 troubled debt restructurings granted since December 31, 2008, only 6 have defaulted.

Nonperforming Assets

The following table summarizes the Corporation’s nonperforming assets as of December 31:

   2011  2010  2009  2008  2007 

Nonaccrual loans

  $6,389   $5,610   $8,522   $11,175   $4,156  

Accruing loans past due 90 days or more

   760    486    768    1,251    1,727  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total nonperforming loans

   7,149    6,096    9,290    12,426    5,883  

Other real estate owned

   1,867    2,039    1,141    2,770    1,376  

Repossessed assets

   9    28    16    153      
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total nonperforming assets

  $9,025   $8,163   $10,447   $15,349   $7,259  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Nonperforming loans as a % of total loans

   0.95  0.83  1.28  1.69  0.96
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Nonperforming assets as a % of total assets

   0.67  0.67  0.91  1.35  0.76
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Loans are placed in nonaccrual status when the foreclosure process has begun, generally after a loan is 90 days past due, unless they are well secured and in the process of collection. Upon transferring the loans to nonaccrual status, an evaluation to determine the net realizable value of the underlying collateral is performed. This evaluation is used to help determine if any charge downs are necessary. Loans may be placed back on accrual status after six months of continued performance.

The following table summarizes the Corporation’s nonaccrual loan balances by type as of December 31:

   2011   2010   2009   2008   2007 

Commercial and agricultural

  $4,805    $4,140    $5,810    $8,059    $1,959  

Residential mortgage

   1,584     1,470     2,657     3,092     2,185  

Consumer installment

             55     24     12  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
  $6,389    $5,610    $8,522    $11,175    $4,156  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Included in nonaccrual commercial and agricultural loans was one loan with a balance of $1,900 as of December 31, 2011 and $2,679 as of December 31, 2010. As of December 31, 2011, there is an abundance of collateral. Additionally, these loans arewas no specific allocation established for this loan as it has been charged down to their estimatedreflect the current market value of the real estate, while there was a specific allocation established in the amount of $345 as of December 31, 2010. Nonaccrual commercial and agricultural loans also included one loan with a balance of $1,014 as of December 31, 2011, for which there was no specific allocation established as the net realizable value when placed on nonaccrual. Historically, residential real estate loans were placed in nonaccrual status upon reaching the beginning of the legally mandated borrower redemption period,loan’s underlying collateral exceeded the loan’s outstanding balance. Commercial and agricultural nonaccrual loans included one credit with a balance of $1,800 as of December 31, 2009 which is typically six months. Chargeoffs of any expected deficiency were recognized at the end of the six month redemption period. These efforts have had a significant impact on the increase in loans classified as nonaccrual as well as the increase in gross chargeoffs in 2008.

The increase in the Corporation’s nonperforming loans is primarily relatedwas subsequently transferred to the current market difficulties previously discussed related to real estate loans. These market difficulties have also resulted in a substantial increase in restructured loans. The majority of the increase in restructured loans is the result of the Corporation working with borrowers to develop a payment structure that will allow them to continue making payments in lieu of foreclosure.
The increase in OREO is also related to the downturn in the residential real estate market. Management has evaluated the properties held as other real estate owned and has adjusted the carrying value of each property to the lower of the Bank’s carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell, as necessary. Management expects the balance of OREO to continue to increase throughout 2009 both as the result of increases in foreclosures as well as increases in the marketing time for home sales.
Managementthird quarter of 2010. There were no other individually significant credits included in nonaccrual loans as of December 31, 2011, 2010, 2009, 2008, or 2007.

Included in the nonaccrual loan balances above were credits currently classified as restructured loans as of December 31:

   2011   2010   2009   2008 

Commercial and agricultural

  $520    $115    $1,692    $1,985  

Residential mortgage

   497     573     424       
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
  $1,017    $688    $2,116    $1,985  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

The Corporation had no restructured loans in nonaccrual status as of December 31, 2007.

The Corporation has devoted considerable attention to identifying impaired loans for which losses are possible and adjusting the net carrying value of these loans to their current net realizable values.values through the establishment of a specific reserve or the recording of a charge off. To management’s knowledge, thereall loans that are no other loans which cause managementdeemed to be impaired have serious doubts as to the ability of a borrower to comply with their loan repayment terms.been recognized. A continued decline in residential real estate values may require further write downs of loans in foreclosure and other real estate owned and could potentially have an adverse impact on the Corporation’s financial performance.

As

Based on management’s analysis, the allowance for loan losses is considered appropriate as of December 31, 2008, there were no other interest bearing assets which required classification.2011. Management is not aware of any recommendations by regulatory agencieswill continue to closely monitor its overall credit quality to ensure that if implemented, would have a material impact on the Corporation’s liquidity, capital, or operations.


71allowance for loan losses remains appropriate.


Noninterest Income

The following table shows the changes in noninterest income between the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006 respectively.

                             
  Year Ended December 31 
        Change     Change 
  2008  2007  $  %  2006  $  % 
 
Service charges and fee income                            
NSF and overdraft fees $3,413  $2,961  $452   15.3% $2,950  $11   0.4%
Trust fees  886   1,035   (149)  −14.4%  866   169   19.5%
Freddie Mac servicing fee  627   635   (8)  −1.3%  635      0.0%
ATM and debit card fees  1,029   737   292   39.6%  545   192   35.2%
Service charges on deposit accounts  372   328   44   13.4%  315   13   4.1%
Net OMSR (loss) income  (92)  43   (135)  N/M   30   13   43.3%
All other  135   155   (20)  −12.9%  149   6   4.0%
                             
Total service charges and fees
  6,370   5,894   476   8.1%  5,490   404   7.4%
Title insurance revenue  234   2,192   (1,958)  −89.3%  2,389   (197)  −8.2%
Gain on sale of mortgage loans  249   209   40   19.1%  207   2   1.0%
Net gain on trading securities  245   460   (215)  −46.7%     460   N/M 
Other                            
Increase in cash value of corporate owned life insurance policies  616   432   184   42.6%  404   28   6.9%
Brokerage and advisory fees  480   276   204   73.9%  213   63   29.6%
Gain (loss) on sale of investment securities  24   (19)  43   N/M   (112)  93   83.0%
Net loss on borrowings measured at fair value  (641)  (66)  (575)  N/M      (66)  N/M 
All other  225   584   (359)  −61.5%  507   77   15.2%
                             
Total other
  704   1,207   (503)  −41.7%  1,012   195   19.3%
                             
Total noninterest income
 $7,802  $9,962  $(2,160)  −21.7% $9,098  $864   9.5%
                             


72

31:


         Change     Change 
   2011  2010  $  %  2009  $  % 

Service charges and fees

        

NSF and overdraft fees

  $2,500   $2,809   $(309  –11.0 $3,187   $(378  –11.9

ATM and debit card fees

   1,736    1,492    244    16.4  1,218    274    22.5

Trust fees

   979    896    83    9.3  814    82    10.1

Mortgage servicing fees

   732    760    (28  –3.7  724    36    5.0

Service charges on deposit accounts

   324    333    (9  –2.7  344    (11  –3.2

Net originated mortgage servicing rights (loss) income

   (293  47    (340  N/M    514    (467  –90.9

All other

   140    143    (3  –2.1  112    31    27.7
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total service charges and fees

   6,118    6,480    (362  –5.6  6,913    (433  –6.3

Gain on sale of mortgage loans

   538    610    (72  –11.8  886    (276  –31.2

Net (loss) gain on trading securities

   (78  (94  16    17.0  80    (174  N/M  

Net gain on borrowings measured at fair value

   181    227    (46  –20.3  289    (62  –21.5

Gain on sale of available-for-sale investment securities

   3    348    (345  –99.1  648    (300  –46.3

Other

        

Earnings on corporate owned life insurance policies

   609    663    (54  –8.1  641    22    3.4

Brokerage and advisory fees

   545    573    (28  –4.9  521    52    10.0

Corporate Settlement Solutions joint venture

   (182  11    (193  N/M    (122  133    N/M  

All other

   484    482    2    0.4  300    182    60.7
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total other

   1,456    1,729    (273  –15.8  1,340    389    29.0
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total noninterest income

  $8,218   $9,300   $(1,082  –11.6 $10,156   $(856  –8.4
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Significant changes in noninterest income are detailed below:

Noninterest Income (excluding the activity of GCFC since January 1, 2008 to make year to year comparisons more meaningful)
                             
  Year Ended December 31 
        Change     Change 
  2008  2007  $  %  2006  $  % 
 
Service charges and fee income                            
NSF and overdraft fees $3,094  $2,961  $133   4.5% $2,950  $11   0.4%
Trust fees  886   1,035   (149)  −14.4%  866   169   19.5%
Freddie Mac servicing fee  626   635   (9)  −1.4%  635      0.0%
ATM and debit card fees  995   737   258   35.0%  545   192   35.2%
Service charges on deposit accounts  330   328   2   0.6%  315   13   4.1%
Net OMSR (loss) income  (92)  43   (135)  N/M   30   13   43.3%
All other  118   155   (37)  −23.9%  149   6   4.0%
                             
Total service charges and fees
  5,957   5,894   63   1.1%  5,490   404   7.4%
Title insurance revenue  234   2,192   (1,958)  −89.3%  2,389   (197)  −8.2%
Gain on sale of mortgage loans  207   209   (2)  −1.0%  207   2   1.0%
Net gain on trading securities  236   460   (224)  −48.7%     460   N/M 
Other                            
Increase in cash value of corporate owned life insurance policies  604   432   172   39.8%  404   28   6.9%
Brokerage and advisory fees  430   276   154   55.8%  213   63   29.6%
Gain (loss) on sale of investment securities  24   (19)  43   N/M   (112)  93   83.0%
Net loss on borrowings measured at fair value  (641)  (66)  (575)  N/M      (66)  N/M 
All other  229   584   (355)  −60.8%  507   77   15.2%
                             
Total other
  646   1,207   (561)  −46.5%  1,012   195   19.3%
                             
Total noninterest income
 $7,280  $9,962  $(2,682)  −26.9% $9,098  $864   9.5%
                             
Management continuously analyzes various fees related to deposit accounts including service charges and NSF and overdraft fees, and ATM and debit card fees. Based on these analyses, the Corporation makes any necessary adjustments to ensure that its fee structure is within the range of its competitors, while at the same time making sure that the fees remain fair to deposit customers. Management does not expect significant changes to its deposit fee structureNSF and overdraft fees have been steadily declining over the past two years, with the decline accelerating in 2009.
Trustthe third quarter of 2010 as a result of new regulatory guidance issued by the Federal Reserve Bank. The Corporation anticipates that NSF and overdraft fees fluctuate from period to period based on various factors including changeswill approximate current levels in mix of their customers’ portfolios and the closing of client estates (as much of their estate fees are non-recurring in nature and are based on the assets of the estate).2012.

The increases in ATM and debit card fees are primarily the result of the increased usage of debit cards by the Bank’s customers. As management does not anticipate any significant changes to the ATM and debit card fee structures, these fees are expected to continue to increase as the usage of debit cards increases.

The decline in net OMSR (originated mortgage servicing rights) income was

Trust fees have increased primarily due to anincreases in the size of the managed portfolio. As management anticipates continued growth in trust services, it anticipates trust fees to continue to increase in amortization expense.2012.

Net originated mortgage servicing rights (OMSR) represent the fair value of servicing rights of loans sold to the secondary market, with changes in the fair value recorded in earnings. Changes in the fair

value of OMSR are primarily driven by fluctuations in the balance of loans sold to the secondary market and by offering rates on new residential mortgages. The losses incurred in 2011 were a result of historically low interest rates which increases the likelihood of refinancing activity, thus reducing the value of OMSR.

As a result of lower than normal residential mortgage rates, the Corporation experienced increases in the volume of loans sold to the secondary market during 2009, leading to a corresponding increase in amortization wasgains from the resultsale of the estimated lives on the mortgage loans serviced decreasing, which was driven by decreases in 2009. As the rates offered ondemand for new loansmortgages declined in December 2008. Typically as2010 and 2011, so did the rates on mortgages decline, there is an increase in consumer refinancing, which results in an increase in amortizationgain from the sale of OMSR and eventually an increase inmortgage loans. The Corporation anticipates that the gain on sale of mortgage loans. Asmortgages will remain at the large declinescurrent levels in interest rates occurred so close to year end, the Corporation had not observed any large increases2012.

Fluctuations in the gain on sale


73


of mortgage loans. However, the Corporation does anticipate significant increases in gains from the sales from mortgage loans in 2009.
Title insurance fees have decreased as a result of a joint venture between IBT Title and Insurance Agency and Corporate Title on March 1, 2008 (see Note 2 — “Business Combinations and Joint Venture Formation” of Noteslosses related to Consolidated Financial Statements).
Net gains from trading activities have declined significantly from last year. Exclusive of the effects of the merger with GCFC, net gains on trading securities have declined by 48.7% to $236. Significant losses on trading securities were incurred in the second quarter, primarily related to municipal investment securities. The reason for the large declines in value in this sector was related to the downgrading of the two largest bond insurers from AAA to AA in June 2008. These downgrades caused the market to demand higher returns on insured bonds, which has resulted in declines in the value of the Corporation’s municipal bond portfolio, as the majority of the portfolio is insured. Despite the significant declines in interest rates observed during the fourth quarter of 2008, the trading portfolio has struggled to increase in value. Typically, as market rates decline, the value of these securities will increase, while the value ofand borrowings carried at fair market value will decrease. However,are caused by interest rate variances. Management does not anticipate any significant fluctuations in net trading activities in 2012 as significant interest rate changes are not expected.

The Corporation continually analyzes its available-for-sale investment portfolio for advantageous selling opportunities.

The Corporation’s earnings from its joint venture in Corporate Settlement Solutions (a title insurance agency) have been negatively impacted by expenses incurred to enhance the increases in the value of trading securities have not increased as much as the values of borrowings carried at fair market value have decreased.

Income related to the value of Corporate owned life insurance has increased as a result of the purchase of additional policiesservices offered as well as transferring the managementexpand their market area.

The fluctuations in all other income are spread throughout various categories, none of the policies to a new investment advisor.

The year ended December 31, 2008 was a good year for brokerage and advisory services income, and one of the most productive years in the Corporation’s history. These resultswhich are due to an increase in customer base and a conscious effort by management to expand the Bank’s presence in the local market. The Corporation anticipates this trend to continue throughout 2009.
The increase in total noninterest income from 2006 to 2007 was partially the result of the acquisition of Farwell State Savings Bank in October 2006. Exclusive of the effects of the acquisition, total noninterest income increased 6.29%. There were no individually significant changes other than those noted above between 2007 and 2006.


74significant.


Noninterest Expenses

The following table shows the changes in noninterest expenses between the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006 respectively.

                             
  Year Ended December 31 
        Change     Change 
  2008  2007  $  %  2006  $  % 
 
Compensation                            
Leased employee salaries $12,232  $11,362   870   7.7% $10,105  $1,257   12.4%
Leased employee benefits  4,502   4,096   406   9.9%  3,608   488   13.5%
All other  258   160   98   61.3%  156   4   2.6%
                             
Total compensation
  16,992   15,618   1,374   8.8%  13,869   1,749   12.6%
                             
Occupancy                            
Depreciation  508   448   60   13.4%  412   36   8.7%
Outside services  492   332   160   48.2%  334   (2)  −0.6%
Property taxes  411   384   27   7.0%  322   62   19.3%
Utilities  366   344   22   6.4%  320   24   7.5%
Building rent  3   72   (69)  −95.8%  163   (91)  −55.8%
Building repairs  202   147   55   37.4%  129   18   14.0%
All other  53   39   14   35.9%  50   (11)  −22.0%
                             
Total occupancy
  2,035   1,766   269   15.2%  1,730   36   2.1%
                             
Furniture and equipment                            
Depreciation  1,663   1,512   151   10.0%  1,440   72   5.0%
Computer/service contracts  1,526   1,254   272   21.7%  1,101   153   13.9%
ATM and debit card fees  570   433   137   31.6%  263   170   64.6%
All other  90   98   (8)  −8.2%  64   34   53.1%
                             
Total furniture and equipment
  3,849   3,297   552   16.7%  2,868   429   15.0%
                             
Other                            
Audit and SOX compliance fees  565   583   (18)  −3.1%  1,010   (427)  −42.3%
Marketing  691   642   49   7.6%  697   (55)  −7.9%
Directors fees  867   796   71   8.9%  584   212   36.3%
Printing and supplies  508   462   46   10.0%  377   85   22.5%
Education and travel  446   412   34   8.3%  360   52   14.4%
Postage and freight  523   459   64   13.9%  445   14   3.1%
Legal  419   296   123   41.6%  229   67   29.3%
Amortization of deposit premium  415   278   137   49.3%  160   118   73.8%
Foreclosed assets  419   157   262   166.9%  41   116   N/M 
Collection  279   112   167   149.1%  31   81   N/M 
Brokerage and advisory  205   92   113   122.8%  31   61   196.8%
FDIC Insurance  313   95   218   N/M   87   8   9.2%
Consulting  298   176   122   69.3%  208   (32)  −15.4%
All other  1,880   1,988   (108)  −5.4%  1,746   242   13.9%
                             
Total other
  7,828   6,548   1,280   19.5%  6,006   542   9.0%
                             
Total noninterest expenses
 $30,704  $27,229  $3,475   12.8% $24,473  $2,756   11.3%
                             


75

31:


           Change      Change 
   2011   2010   $  %  2009   $  % 

Compensation and benefits

           

Leased employee salaries

  $14,377    $13,697    $680    5.0 $13,494    $203    1.5

Leased employee benefits

   4,902     4,837     65    1.3  4,745     92    1.9

All other

   13     18     (5  –27.8  19     (1  –5.3
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total compensation and benefits

   19,292     18,552     740    4.0  18,258     294    1.6
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Occupancy

           

Property taxes

   470     505     (35  –6.9  439     66    15.0

Utilities

   462     423     39    9.2  393     30    7.6

Outside services

   587     524     63    12.0  433     91    21.0

Depreciation

   605     584     21    3.6  546     38    7.0

Building repairs

   262     243     19    7.8  288     (45  –15.6

All other

   84     72     12    16.7  71     1    1.4
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total occupancy

   2,470     2,351     119    5.1  2,170     181    8.3
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Furniture and equipment

           

Depreciation

   1,916     1,938     (22  –1.1  1,803     135    7.5

Computer/service contracts

   1,898     1,779     119    6.7  1,676     103    6.1

ATM and debit card fees

   629     595     34    5.7  621     (26  –4.2

All other

   54     32     22    68.8  46     (14  –30.4
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total furniture and equipment

   4,497     4,344     153    3.5  4,146     198    4.8
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

FDIC insurance premiums

   1,086     1,254     (168  –13.4  1,730     (476  –27.5
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Other

           

Marketing and community relations

   1,174     1,093     81    7.4  894     199    22.3

Foreclosed asset and collection

   576   �� 916     (340  –37.1  831     85    10.2

Legal fees

   302     382     (80  –20.9  415     (33  –8.0

Audit and SOX compliance fees

   714     710     4    0.6  546     164    30.0

Consulting fees

   386     167     219    131.1  201     (34  –16.9

Directors fees

   842     887     (45  –5.1  923     (36  –3.9

Amortization of deposit premium

   299     338     (39  –11.5  375     (37  –9.9

Education and travel

   526     499     27    5.4  395     104    26.3

Postage and freight

   388     395     (7  –1.8  472     (77  –16.3

Printing and supplies

   405     420     (15  –3.6  529     (109  –20.6

All other

   1,573     1,499     74    4.9  1,798     (299  –16.6
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total other

   7,185     7,306     (121  –1.7  7,379     (73  –1.0
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total noninterest expenses

  $34,530    $33,807    $723    2.1 $33,683    $124    0.4
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Significant changes in noninterest expenses are detailed below:

Noninterest Expenses (excluding the activity of GCFC since January 1, 2008 to make year-to-year comparisons more meaningful)
                             
  Year Ended December 31 
        Change     Change 
  2008  2007  $  %  2006  $  % 
 
Compensation                            
Leased employee salaries $11,152  $11,362  $(210)  −1.8% $10,105  $1,257   12.4%
Leased employee benefits  4,144   4,096   48   1.2%  3,608   488   13.5%
All other  241   160   81   50.6%  156   4   2.6%
                             
Total compensation
  15,537   15,618   (81)  −0.5%  13,869   1,749   12.6%
                             
Occupancy                            
Depreciation  445   448   (3)  −0.7%  412   36   8.7%
Outside services  404   332   72   21.7%  334   (2)  −0.6%
Property taxes  388   384   4   1.0%  322   62   19.3%
Utilities  340   344   (4)  −1.2%  320   24   7.5%
Building rent  3   72   (69)  −95.8%  163   (91)  −55.8%
Building repairs  185   147   38   25.9%  129   18   14.0%
All other  49   39   10   25.6%  50   (11)  −22.0%
                             
Total occupancy
  1,814   1,766   48   2.7%  1,730   36   2.1%
                             
Furniture and equipment                            
Depreciation  1,557   1,512   45   3.0%  1,440   72   5.0%
Computer/service contracts  1,322   1,254   68   5.4%  1,101   153   13.9%
ATM and debit card fees  553   433   120   27.7%  263   170   64.6%
All other  80   98   (18)  −18.4%  64   34   53.1%
                             
Total furniture and equipment
  3,512   3,297   215   6.5%  2,868   429   15.0%
                             
Other                            
Audit and SOX compliance fees  557   583   (26)  −4.5%  1,010   (427)  −42.3%
Marketing  636   642   (6)  −0.9%  697   (55)  −7.9%
Directors fees  771   796   (25)  −3.1%  584   212   36.3%
Printing and supplies  479   462   17   3.7%  377   85   22.5%
Education and travel  401   412   (11)  −2.7%  360   52   14.4%
Postage and freight  495   459   36   7.8%  445   14   3.1%
Legal  411   296   115   38.9%  229   67   29.3%
Amortization of deposit premium  415   278   137   49.3%  160   118   73.8%
Foreclosed assets  390   157   233   148.4%  41   116   N/M 
Collection  158   112   46   41.1%  31   81   N/M 
Brokerage and advisory  205   92   113   122.8%  31   61   196.8%
FDIC Insurance  275   95   180   189.5%  87   8   9.2%
Consulting  269   176   93   52.8%  208   (32)  −15.4%
All other  1,531   1,988   (457)  −23.0%  1,746   242   13.9%
                             
Total other
  6,993   6,548   445   6.8%  6,006   542   9.0%
                             
Total noninterest expenses
 $27,856  $27,229  $627   2.3% $24,473  $2,756   11.3%
                             


76


Leased employee salaries expenses have decreased as a result of the new joint venture entered intoincreased during the first quarter of 2008 (see “Note 2 — Business Combinations and Joint Venture Formation” of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements). Exclusive of the effects of this joint venture, leased employee salaries expenses have increased2011 due to annual merit increases and staff additions. These staff additions have allowed the continued growth ofCorporation to continue to grow as well as to comply with new regulations, including the Corporation. Despite the reduction in salariesDodd-Frank Act. Leased employee benefits fluctuate from period to period primarily as a result of changes in health care related expenses. The Corporation anticipates adding to staffing levels in 2012 to ensure compliance with new regulations set forth in the above mentioned joint venture, leased employeeDodd-Frank Act, which is estimated to increase salary and benefits increasedby $331.

FDIC insurance premium expense decreased in 2011 due to changes to the assessment rates on April 1, 2011. Premiums declined between 2009 and 2010 as a result of continued increasesan FDIC special assessment of $479 in health care costs.

A significant portion of the increaseSeptember 2009. Management expects FDIC insurance premiums to decline slightly in occupancy and equipment is related to additional expenses incurred for snowplowing during the fourth quarter of 2008. This increase was offset by a decline in building rent,2012 due to the new joint venture.changes in assessment rates.

The increase in furnituremarketing and equipment expensecommunity relations in 20082011 was primarily the result of increases in ATM and debit card expenses. These increases were the result of increased usage of debit cards by the Bank’s customers,a new initiative to track customer service satisfaction as well as the Bank incurs a fee each time a card is used.

Management has been diligently working to decrease audit and Sarbanes Oxley (SOX) compliance fees through improved efficiencies. These fees have steadily declined over the past few years as a resultenhancement of the centralization of corporate processes.
Corporation’s website. The increasesincrease in director feesmarketing and community relations expenses in 2007 were the result of additional meetings2010 was primarily related to ongoing strategic planning, which was partiallyan increase in charitable contributions. Charitable contributions were essentially unchanged between 2010 and 2011 with no significant changes expected in 2012.

While foreclosed asset and collection expenses remain at historically high levels, they have declined significantly from 2010. Management anticipates that these expenses will approximate current levels in 2012.

The Corporation’s legal expenses can fluctuate from period to period based on the volume of foreclosures as well as expenses related to the acquisitionCorporation’s ongoing operations, including regulatory compliance. The Corporation does not anticipate any significant fluctuations in legal expenses in 2012.

Audit and SOX compliance fees fluctuate due to the timing of Greenville Community Financial Corporation and the joint venture with Corporate Title, LLC (see “Note 2 — Business Combinations and Joint Venture Formation”performance of Notesrecurring audit procedures.

Director fees declined in 2011 due to Consolidated Financial Statements).the retirement of several directors. Director fees are expected to approximate current levels in 2012.

The Corporation places a strong emphasis on continuing education. These educational programscustomer service. To help provide team members with a competitive edge in the market place. Over the past three years, the Corporation offered structured leadership training to its employees. This program is designed to help develop and optimize the communication skills of its participants. Management feels that this investment in its employees today will pay dividends for years to come.

The increase in the amortization of deposit premium is related to the January 2008 acquisition of GCFC.
As a result of the recent increases in delinquencies and foreclosures,enhance customer service satisfaction, the Corporation has experiencedmade a significant increasesinvestment in legal, foreclosed asset,various training programs. These programs coupled with the customer service tracking initiative (noted above) will increase service levels which will increase shareholder value. Management expects that education related expenses to remain at current levels in 2012.

Postage and collection expenses. Thesefreight expenses have declined, and are expected to continue to increase throughout 2009 as management anticipates that delinquency rates and foreclosures will increase.

FDIC insurance expense has increased not onlydecline, as a result of growth of the Corporation, but primarily as a result of increases in the premium rates charged by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. These expenses are expected to significantly increase in 2009 as a result of further premium increases.
Consulting fees increased in 2008 primarily as a result of a potential new branch location study that was performed.
All other expenses include title insurance expensesfewer special mailings as well as other miscellaneous expenses. All other expenses decreased by $222 as a result of the new joint venture (see “Note 2 — Business Combinations and Joint Venture Formation” of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements). The main reasons for thean increase in the Corporation’s customer’s usage of electronic statements.

Printing and supplies expenses have steadily declined since 2009 as the Corporation has instituted a document imaging solution decreasing the amount of paper and related supplies. Management anticipates this line itemtrend to continue in 2007 were related2012.

The increase in consulting fees is due to expensessuccession planning for key executives to help the Board of approximately $130 incurred to convert the Farwell Division to Isabella Bank’s core banking platformDirectors and management identify, attract, and retain future leaders.

The fluctuations in August of 2007. The remaining changes inall other expenses are spread throughout various categories, none of which are individually not significant.

The increase in total noninterest expenses from 2006 to 2007 was partially the result of the acquisition of Farwell State Savings Bank in October 2006. Exclusive of the effects of the acquisition, total noninterest expenses increased 4.9%, with no individually significant changes when comparing 2007 to 2006.
Federal Income Taxes
Federal income tax (benefit) expense for 2008 was ($724) or (21.4%) of pre-tax income compared to $1,605 or 16.8% of pre-tax income in 2007 and $1,919 or 21.5% in 2006. The primary factor behind the reduction in the effective rate in 2008 and 2007 is related to the increase in tax exempt income as a percentage of net income. A


77


reconcilement of actual federal income tax expense reported and the amount computed at the federal statutory rate of 34% is found in Note 12, “Federal Income Taxes”, of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
ANALYSIS OF CHANGES IN FINANCIAL CONDITION

The following table shows the composition and changes in the Corporation’s balance sheet as of December 31:

         Change 
   2011  2010  $  % 

ASSETS

     

Cash and cash equivalents

  $28,590   $18,109   $10,481    57.88

Certificates of deposit held in other financial institutions

   8,924    15,808    (6,884  –43.55

Trading securities

   4,710    5,837    (1,127  –19.31

Available-for-sale securities

   425,120    330,724    94,396    28.54

Mortgage loans available-for-sale

   3,205    1,182    2,023    171.15

Loans

   750,291    735,304    14,987    2.04

Allowance for loan losses

   (12,375  (12,373  (2  0.02

Premises and equipment

   24,626    24,627    (1  0.00

Corporate owned life insurance

   22,075    17,466    4,609    26.39

Accrued interest receivable

   5,848    5,456    392    7.18

Equity securities without readily determinable fair values

   17,189    17,564    (375  –2.14

Goodwill and other intangible assets

   46,792    47,091    (299  –0.63

Other assets

   12,930    19,015    (6,085  –32.00
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

TOTAL ASSETS

  $1,337,925   $1,225,810   $112,115    9.15
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

     

Liabilities

     

Deposits

  $958,164   $877,339   $80,825    9.21

Borrowed funds

   216,136    194,917    21,219    10.89

Accrued interest payable and other liabilities

   8,842    8,393    449    5.35
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total liabilities

   1,183,142    1,080,649    102,493    9.48

Shareholders’ equity

   154,783    145,161    9,622    6.63
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

  $1,337,925   $1,225,810   $112,115    9.15
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

As shown in the following tables,above, the Corporation experienced another year of solid asset growth. Thisenjoyed strong balance sheet growth has beensince December 31, 2010. The primary driver behind this growth was excellent demand for deposit products. As loan demand did not keep pace with the result ofincrease in deposits, the Corporation’s continued growth strategies, including the GCFC acquisition. See below for further discussion.

                 
  December 31       
  2008  2007  $ Change  % Change 
 
ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents $23,554  $25,583  $(2,029)  −7.93%
Trading account securities  21,775   25,064   (3,289)  −13.12%
Securities available for sale  246,455   213,127   33,328   15.64%
Mortgage loans available for sale  898   2,214   (1,316)  −59.44%
Loans  735,385   612,687   122,698   20.03%
Allowance for loan losses  (11,982)  (7,301)  (4,681)  64.11%
Bank premises and equipment  23,231   22,516   715   3.18%
Acquisition intangibles, net  47,804   27,010   20,794   76.99%
Equity securities without readily determinable fair values  17,345   7,353   9,992   135.89%
Other assets  34,798   29,029   5,769   19.87%
                 
Total assets
 $1,139,263  $957,282  $181,981   19.01%
                 
 
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Liabilities
                
Deposits $775,630  $733,473  $42,157   5.75%
Other borrowed funds  222,350   92,887   129,463   139.38%
Escrow funds payable     1,912   (1,912)  −100.00%
Accrued interest and other liabilities  6,807   5,930   877   14.79%
                 
Total liabilities
  1,004,787   834,202   170,585   20.45%
Shareholders’ equity
  134,476   123,080   11,396   9.26%
                 
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity
 $1,139,263  $957,282  $181,981   19.01%
                 


78

Corporation increased its holdings in available-for-sale investment securities.


Analysis of changes in financial condition (excluding the effects of the acquisition of GCFC on January 1, 2008 to make the year-to-year comparisons more useful)
                 
  December 31       
  2008  2007  $ Change  % Change 
 
ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents $21,090  $25,583  $(4,493)  −17.56%
Trading account securities  16,796   25,064   (8,268)  −32.99%
Securities available for sale  239,448   213,127   26,321   12.35%
Mortgage loans available for sale  898   2,214   (1,316)  −59.44%
Loans  646,772   612,687   34,085   5.56%
Allowance for loan losses  (11,982)  (7,301)  (4,681)  64.11%
Bank premises and equipment  21,177   22,516   (1,339)  −5.95%
Acquisition intangibles, net  47,804   27,010   20,794   76.99%
Equity securities without readily determinable fair values  16,937   7,353   9,584   130.34%
Other assets  32,336   29,029   3,307   11.39%
                 
Total assets
 $1,031,276  $957,282  $73,994   7.73%
                 
 
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Liabilities
                
Deposits $685,479  $733,473  $(47,994)  −6.54%
Other borrowed funds  216,725   92,887   123,838   133.32%
Escrow funds payable     1,912   (1,912)  −100.00%
Accrued interest and other liabilities  6,661   5,930   731   12.33%
                 
Total liabilities
  908,865   834,202   74,663   8.95%
Shareholders’ equity
  122,411   123,080   (669)  −0.54%
                 
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity
 $1,031,276  $957,282  $73,994   7.73%
                 
A discussion of changes in balance sheet amounts by major categories follows:

Trading account securitiesCertificates of deposit held in other financial institutions

As previously mentioned,

During 2011, the Corporation commenced a balance sheet reorganization strategyreinvested maturities of certificates of deposit held in 2007 which resulted in a transfer ofother financial institutions into available-for-sale investment securities to trading securities.increase net interest margins (as the yields on available-for-sale investment securities exceeded the potential reinvestment rates for certificates of deposits held in other financial institutions during the year). This trend is likely to continue in 2012.

Trading securities

Trading securities are carried at fair value. The Corporation’s overall intent wasis to maintain a trading portfolio to enhance the ongoing restructuring of assets and liabilities as part of our interest rate risk management

objectives (See Note 34 “Trading Securities” of the Consolidated Financial Statements).


79

Due to the current interest rate environment, the Corporation has allowed this balance to decline.


The following is a schedule of the carrying value of trading securities as of December 31:

   2011   2010   2009 

States and political subdivisions

  $4,710    $5,837    $9,962  

Mortgage-backed

             3,601  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $4,710    $5,837    $13,563  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Available-for-sale Investment Securitiesinvestment securities

The primary objective of the Corporation’s investing activities is to provide for safety of the principal invested. Secondary considerations include the need for earnings, liquidity, and the Corporation’s overall exposure to changes in interest rates. Securities are currently classified as available-for-sale or trading and are stated at fair value.

The following is a schedule of the carrying value of investment securities available-for-sale:

             
  December 31 
  2008  2007  2006 
 
Available-for-sale            
U.S. Government and federal agencies $67,071  $54,239  $69,020 
States and political subdivisions  149,323   130,956   112,754 
Corporate  7,145   12,000   11,053 
Money market preferred securities  5,979   12,300    
Mortgage-backed  16,937   3,632   20,623 
             
Total
 $246,455  $213,127  $213,450 
             
The following is a scheduleavailable-for-sale as of the carrying value of trading securities:
         
  December 31 
  2008  2007 
 
Trading Securities        
U.S. Government and federal agencies $4,014  $4,024 
States and political subdivisions  11,556   10,324 
Corporate  160   1,004 
Mortgage-backed  6,045   9,712 
         
Total
 $21,775  $25,064 
         
December 31:

   2011   2010   2009 

Government sponsored enterprises

  $397    $5,404    $19,471  

States and political subdivisions

   174,938     169,717     151,730  

Auction rate money market preferred

   2,049     2,865     2,973  

Preferred stocks

   5,033     6,936     7,054  

Mortgage-backed securities

   143,602     102,215     67,734  

Collateralized mortgage obligations

   99,101     43,587     10,104  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $425,120    $330,724    $259,066  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Excluding those holdings in government sponsored enterprises and municipalities within the state of the investment portfolio in U.S. Government and federal agencies,Michigan, there were no investments in securities of any one issuer that exceeded 10% of shareholders’ equity. The Corporation has a policy prohibiting investments in securities that it deems are unsuitable due to their inherent credit or market risks. Prohibited investments include stripped mortgage backed securities, zero coupon bonds, nongovernment agency asset backed securities, and structured notes.

The Corporation has invested $11,000Corporation’s holdings in auction rate money market preferred investment security instruments, which are classified as available-for-salemortgage-backed securities and reflected at fair value. Due to recent events,collateralized mortgage obligations include only government agencies and government sponsored agencies as the credit markets for theseCorporation holds no investments have become illiquid.
Due to the current illiquidity of thesein private label mortgage-backed securities the fair values were estimated utilizing a discounted cash flow analysis or other type of valuation adjustment methodology as of December 31, 2008. These analyses consider, among other factors, the collateral underlying the security investments, the creditworthiness of the counterparty, the timing of expected future cash flows, estimates of the next time the security is expected to have a successful auction, and the Corporation’s positive intent and ability to hold such securities until credit markets improve. These securities were also compared, when possible, to other securities with similar characteristics (see Note 4 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements).


80

collateralized mortgage obligations.


The following is a schedule of maturities of available for saleavailable-for-sale investment securities (at carryingfair value) and their weighted average yield as of December 31, 2008.2011. Weighted average yields have been computed on a fully taxable-equivalent basis using a tax rate of 34%. Mortgage-backedAuction rate money market preferred securities are long term floating rate instruments for which interest rates are set at periodic auctions. At each successful auction, the Corporation has the option to sell the security at par value. Additionally, the issuers of auction rate securities generally have the right to redeem or refinance the debt. Because of their variable monthly payments, auction rate money market preferreds, preferred stocks, mortgage-backed securities, and collateralized mortgage

obligations are included innot reported by a specific maturity categories based on their stated maturity date.group. Expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities because issuers may have the right to call or prepay obligations. Trading securities have been excluded as they are not expected to be held to maturity.

                                 
  Maturing 
     After One Year But
  After Five Years But
    
  Within One Year  Within Five Years  Within Ten Years  After Ten Years 
  Amount  Yield (%)  Amount  Yield (%)  Amount  Yield (%)  Amount  Yield (%) 
 
Available-for-sale                                
U.S. Government and federal agencies $4,083   3.29  $37,324   4.40  $25,664   4.82  $    
States and political subdivisions  9,956   5.14   37,564   5.59   54,494   5.70   47,309   4.92 
Mortgage-backed  25   2.79   361   5.33   2,459   5.34   14,092   4.86 
Money market preferred securities  5,979   4.12                   
Corporate  7,145   5.67                   
                                 
Total
 $27,188   4.76  $75,249   5.00  $82,617   5.41  $61,401   4.90 
                                 

  Maturing       
  Within
One Year
  After One
Year But
Within
Five Years
  After Five
Years But
Within
Ten Years
  After
Ten Years
  Securities with
Variable Monthly
Payments or

Continual
Call Dates
 
  Amount  Yield (%)  Amount  Yield (%)  Amount  Yield (%)  Amount  Yield (%)  Amount  Yield (%) 

Government sponsored enterprises

 $       $       $397    7.91   $       $      

States and political subdivisions

  8,441    3.24    35,904    4.12    93,189    3.87    37,404    2.84          

Mortgage-backed securities

          271    5.68    73,974    1.91    69,357    1.97          

Collateralized mortgage

                                  99,101    2.76  

obligations

          

Auction rate money

                                  2,049    4.92  

market preferred

          

Preferred stocks

                                  5,033    4.30  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

 $8,441    3.24   $36,175    4.13   $167,560    3.01   $106,761    2.28   $106,183    2.88  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Loans

The largest component of earning assets is loans. The proper management of credit and market risk inherent in the loan portfolio is critical to the financial well-being of the Corporation. To control these risks, the Corporation has adopted strict underwriting standards. TheThese standards include specific criteria against lending outside the Corporation’s defined market areas, lending limits to a single borrower, and strict loan to collateral value limits. The Corporation also monitors and limits loan concentrations extended to volatiledistressed industries. The Corporation has no foreign loans and there were no concentrations greater than 10% of total loans that are not disclosed as a separate category in the following table.

The following table presents the composition of the loan portfolio for the years ended December 31:

                     
  2008  2007  2006  2005  2004 
 
Commercial $324,806  $238,306  $212,701  $179,541  $146,152 
Agricultural  58,003   47,407   47,302   49,424   49,179 
Residential real estate mortgage  319,397   297,937   300,650   226,251   227,421 
Installment  33,179   29,037   30,389   28,026   30,143 
                     
  $735,385  $612,687  $591,042  $483,242  $452,895 
                     

   2011   2010   2009   2008   2007 

Commercial

  $365,714    $348,852    $340,274    $324,806    $238,306  

Agricultural

   74,645     71,446     64,845     58,003     47,407  

Residential real estate mortgage

   278,360     284,029     285,838     319,397     297,937  

Installment

   31,572     30,977     32,359     33,179     29,037  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
  $750,291    $735,304    $723,316    $735,385    $612,687  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

The following table presents the change in the loan categories for the years ended December 31:

                         
  2008  2007  2006 
  $ Change  % Change  $ Change  % Change  $ Change  % Change 
 
Commercial $86,500   36.3% $25,605   12.0% $33,160   18.5%
Agricultural  10,596   22.4%  105   0.2%  (2,122)  −4.3%
Residential real estate mortgage  21,460   7.2%  (2,713)  −0.9%  74,399   32.9%
Installment  4,142   14.3%  (1,352)  −4.4%  2,363   8.4%
                         
  $122,698   20.0% $21,645   3.7% $107,800   22.3%
                         


81


   2011  2010  2009 
   $ Change  % Change  $ Change  % Change  $ Change  % Change 

Commercial

  $16,862    4.8 $8,578    2.5 $15,468    4.8

Agricultural

   3,199    4.5  6,601    10.2  6,842    11.8

Residential real estate mortgage

   (5,669  –2.0  (1,809  –0.6  (33,559  –10.5

Installment

   595    1.9  (1,382  –4.3  (820  –2.5
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
  $14,987    2.0 $11,988    1.7 $(12,069  –1.6
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

The following table presents the change in loan categories between December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, excluding the loans acquired from GCFC:
                             
     Less
             
     loans
  Adjusted
          
  Consolidated
  Acquired
  Consolidated
  Consolidated 
  12/31/08  from GCFC  12/31/08  12/31/07  $ Change  % Change 
 
Commercial $324,806  $44,605  $280,201  $238,306  $41,895   17.6%    
Agricultural  58,003      58,003   47,407   10,596   22.4%    
Residential real estate mortgage  319,397   37,142   282,255   297,937   (15,682)  −5.3%    
Installment  33,179   6,866   26,313   29,037   (2,724)  −9.4%    
                             
  $735,385  $88,613  $646,772  $612,687  $34,085   5.6%    
                             
The growth in commercial and agricultural loans is a result of the Corporation’s efforts to increase the commercial loan portfolio as a percentage of total loans. A significant portion of this growth has been driven by the Corporation’s new business development team.
Excluding the effects of the Greenville acquisition, residential mortgage loans declined during 2008 as a result of a shift in demand from balloon mortgages to long term fixed rate (typically 30 year) mortgage products. This triggered a decrease in residential mortgage loans as loans with maturity dates greater than 15 years are typically sold to the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (Freddie Mac). Installment loans have been steadily decreasing over the past few years. This is a result of the increased competition from credit unions and financing offered from other non traditional financial institutions. Management expects both residential mortgages and installment loans to decrease during 2009.
A substantial portion of the increase in total loans whenas of December 31, 2006 is2008 compared to 2005, most notably the increase in residential real estate mortgages,December 31, 2007 was thea result of the acquisition of the Farwell State Savings BankGreenville Financial Corporation in October 2006.January 2008. Pursuant to the acquisition, the Corporation purchased gross loans totaling $64,600.
$88,613.

Bank Premises and EquipmentCorporate owned life insurance

Exclusive

During the third quarter of 2011, the Corporation purchased an additional $4,000 of corporate owned life insurance policies. The Corporation purchased these additional policies to provide additional coverage for key employees, while also generating ongoing earnings as the cash surrender values of the effects of the GCFC acquisition, Bank premises and equipment and escrow funds payable have declined as a result of the merger of assets and liabilities between IBT Title and Insurance Agency and Corporate Title Agency, LLC through a joint venture transaction (see “Note 2 — Business Combinations and Joint Venture Formation” of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements), resulting in a reduction in such assets and liabilities.

policies increase.

Equity securities without readily determinable fair values

Equity

Included in equity securities without readily determinable fair values includes Federal Home Loan Bank Stockare restricted securities, which are carried at cost and Federal Reserve Bank Stock. The Corporation has purchased additional shares of stockinvestments in 2008 as a result of the consolidation of the Bank’s charter as well as to fulfill stock requirements to borrow additional funds from the Federal Home Loan Bank. Also included in the increase is the Corporation’s investment in the joint venture between IBT Title and Insurance Agency and Corporate Title Agency, LLC, which isnonconsolidated entities accounted for under the equity method of accounting (see “Note 2 — Business CombinationsNote 1 “Nature of Operations and Joint Venture Formation”Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements).


82


Deposits

The main source of funds for the Corporation is deposits. The deposit portfolio represents various types of non transaction accounts as well as savings accounts and time deposits.

The following table presents the composition of ourthe deposit portfolio as of December 31:
                     
  2008  2007  2006  2005  2004 
 
Noninterest bearing demand deposits $97,546  $84,846  $83,902  $73,839  $65,736 
Interest bearing demand deposits  113,973   105,526   111,406   104,251   101,362 
Savings deposits  182,523   196,682   178,001   153,397   162,516 
Certificates of deposit  340,976   311,976   320,226   250,246   234,262 
Brokered certificates of deposit  28,185   28,197   27,446   7,076    
Internet certificates of deposit  12,427   6,246   4,859   3,669    
                     
Total
 $775,630  $733,473  $725,840  $592,478  $563,876 
                     

   2011   2010   2009   2008   2007 

Noninterest bearing deposits

  $119,072    $104,902    $96,875    $97,546    $84,846  

Interest bearing demand deposits

   163,653     142,259     128,111     113,973     105,526  

Savings deposits

   193,902     177,817     157,020     182,523     196,682  

Certificates of deposit

   395,777     386,435     356,594     340,976     311,976  

Brokered certificates of deposit

   54,326     53,748     50,933     28,185     28,197  

Internet certificates of deposit

   31,434     12,178     13,119     12,427     6,246  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $958,164    $877,339    $802,652    $775,630    $733,473  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

The following table presents the change in the deposit categories for the years ended December 31:

                         
  2008  2007  2006 
  $ Change  % Change  $ Change  % Change  $ Change  % Change 
 
Noninterest bearing demand deposits $12,700   15.0% $944   1.1% $10,063   13.6%
Interest bearing demand deposits  8,447   8.0%  (5,880)  −5.3%  7,155   6.9%
Savings deposits  (14,159)  −7.2%  18,681   10.5%  24,604   16.0%
Certificates of deposit  29,000   9.3%  (8,250)  −2.6%  69,980   28.0%
Brokered certificates of deposit  (12)  0.0%  751   2.7%  20,370   100.0%
Internet certificates of deposit  6,181   99.0%  1,387   28.5%  1,190   100.0%
                         
Total
 $42,157   5.7% $7,633   1.1% $133,362   22.5%
                         
The following table presents the change in deposit categories between December 31, 2008 and 2007, excluding the deposits acquired from GCFC:
                         
     Less
             
     Deposits
  Adjusted
          
  Consolidated
  Acquired
  Consolidated
  Consolidated 
  12/31/08  from GCFC  12/31/08  12/31/07  $ Change  % Change 
 
Noninterest bearing demand deposits $97,546  $10,251  $87,295  $84,846  $2,449   2.9%
Interest bearing demand deposits  113,973   12,236   101,737   105,526   (3,789)  −3.6%
Savings deposits  182,523   10,735   171,788   196,682   (24,894)  −12.7%
Certificates of deposit  340,976   39,911   301,065   311,976   (10,911)  −3.5%
Brokered certificates of deposit  28,185   8,976   19,209   28,197   (8,988)  −31.9%
Internet certificates of deposit  12,427   8,042   4,385   6,246   (1,861)  −29.8%
                         
Total
 $775,630  $90,151  $685,479  $733,473  $(47,994)  −6.5%
                         

   2011   2010   2009 
   $ Change   % Change   $ Change  % Change   $ Change  % Change 

Noninterest bearing deposits

  $14,170     13.5%    $8,027    8.3%    $(671  –0.7%  

Interest bearing demand deposits

   21,394     15.0%     14,148    11.0%     14,138    12.4%  

Savings deposits

   16,085     9.0%     20,797    13.2%     (25,503  –14.0%  

Certificates of deposit

   9,342     2.4%     29,841    8.4%     15,618    4.6%  

Brokered certificates of deposit

   578     1.1%     2,815    5.5%     22,748    80.7%  

Internet certificates of deposit

   19,256     158.1%     (941  –7.2%     692    5.6%  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

  $80,825     9.2%    $74,687    9.3%    $27,022    3.5%  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

As shown in the preceding table, exclusive of the effects of the GCFC acquisition, the Corporation has observed a decline in deposits during 2008.experienced strong deposit growth since December 30, 2010. This decline has beengrowth was the result of increased competitionthe Corporation offering products with other depository institutionscompetitive rates and terms, as well as declines in brokered certificates offocused marketing efforts to increase deposit and internet certificates of deposit. Deposits also declined due to well publicized bank failures, the collapse of the investment banking industry, and uncertainty of the publicmarket share in the financial condition of bankscommunities served. While management anticipates that deposits will continue to increase in general. 2012, it is expected to be at a lower rate than 2011.

The decrease in savings accounts is the result of large deposit customers looking for a secure investment that is fully insured. As a result, the Corporation expanded its repurchase sweep products to meet customers needs. Since December 31, 2007, these repurchase agreements have increased by $41,449; due to the nature of these accounts, they are classified as borrowings. The


83


following table shows the average balances and corresponding interest rates paid on deposit accounts as of December 31:
                         
  2008  2007  2006 
  Amount  Rate  Amount  Rate  Amount  Rate 
 
Noninterest bearing demand deposits $95,552      $80,128      $73,650     
Interest bearing demand deposits  114,889   0.71%  109,370   1.72%  105,476   1.58%
Savings deposits  213,410   1.14%  188,323   2.25%  158,327   1.69%
Time deposits  393,190   4.23%  349,941   4.71%  301,593   4.25%
                         
Total
 $817,041      $727,762      $639,046     
                         

   2011  2010  2009 
   Amount   Rate  Amount   Rate  Amount   Rate 

Noninterest bearing demand deposits

  $113,726        $102,812        $94,408       

Interest bearing demand deposits

   152,530     0.12  137,109     0.11  116,412     0.13

Savings deposits

   192,999     0.25  169,579     0.23  177,538     0.22

Time deposits

   467,931     2.19  430,892     2.55  398,356     3.27
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

Total

  $927,186     $840,392     $786,714    
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

The time remaining until maturity of time certificates and other time deposits of $100 or more atas of December 31, 20082011 was as follows:

     
Maturity    
Within 3 months $36,650 
Within 3 to 6 months  15,550 
Within 6 to 12 months  37,207 
Over 12 months  52,015 
     
Total
 $141,422 
     

Maturity    

Within 3 months

  $42,270  

Within 3 to 6 months

   25,357  

Within 6 to 12 months

   63,423  

Over 12 months

   104,266  
  

 

 

 

Total

  $235,316  
  

 

 

 

Borrowed Funds

As a result

The following table summarizes the Corporation’s borrowings as of December 31:

   2011  2010 
   Amount   Rate  Amount   Rate 

Federal Home Loan Bank advances

  $142,242     3.16 $113,423     3.64

Securities sold under agreements to repurchase without stated maturity dates

   57,198     0.25  45,871     0.25

Securities sold under agreements to repurchase with stated maturity dates

   16,696     3.51  19,623     3.28

Federal funds purchased

            16,000     0.60
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $216,136     2.42 $194,917     2.56
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

The maturity and weighted average interest rates of FHLB advances are as follows as of December 31:

   2011  2010 
   Amount   Rate  Amount   Rate 

Fixed rate advances due 2011

  $        $10,086     3.96

One year putable advances due 2011

            1,000     4.75

Fixed rate advances due 2012

   17,000     2.97  17,000     2.97

One year putable advances due 2012

   15,000     4.10  15,000     4.10

Fixed rate advances due 2013

   5,242     4.14  5,337     4.14

One year putable advances due 2013

   5,000     3.15  5,000     3.15

Fixed rate advances due 2014

   25,000     3.16  25,000     3.16

Fixed rate advances due 2015

   45,000     3.30  25,000     4.63

Fixed rate advances due 2016

   10,000     2.15         

Fixed rate advances due 2017

   20,000     2.56  10,000     2.35
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $142,242     3.16 $113,423     3.64
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

The maturity and weighted average interest rates of securities sold under agreements to repurchase with stated maturity dates are as follows at December 31:

   2011  2010 
   Amount   Rate  Amount   Rate 

Repurchase agreements due 2011

  $        $858     1.51

Repurchase agreements due 2012

   428     2.08  1,013     2.21

Repurchase agreements due 2013

   5,000     4.51  5,127     4.45

Repurchase agreements due 2014

   10,869     3.12  12,087     3.00

Repurchase agreements due 2015

   399     3.25  538     3.25
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $16,696     3.51 $19,623     3.28
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Contractual Obligations and Loan Commitments

The Corporation has various financial obligations, including contractual obligations and commitments, which may require future cash payments. The following schedule summarizes the Corporation’s non-cancelable obligations and future minimum payments as of December 31, 2011:

   Minimum Payments Due by Period 
       After One   After Three         
   Due in   Year But   Years But         
   One Year   Within   Within   After     
   or Less   Three Years   Five Years   Five Years   Total 

Deposits with no stated maturity

  $476,627    $    $    $    $476,627  

Certificates of deposit with stated maturities

   265,299     110,092     99,094     7,052     481,537  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Borrowed funds

          

Short term borrowings

   57,198                    57,198  

Long term borrowings

   32,428     96,510     10,000     20,000     158,938  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total borrowed funds

   89,626     96,510     10,000     20,000     216,136  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total contractual obligations

  $831,552    $206,602    $109,094    $27,052    $1,174,300  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

The Corporation also has loan commitments that may impact liquidity. The following schedule summarizes the Corporation’s loan commitments and expiration dates by period as of December 31, 2011. Since many of these commitments historically have expired without being drawn upon, the total amount of these commitments does not necessarily represent future cash requirements of the Corporation’s recent loan growth, the desire to increase its investment in high quality tax exempt municipal bonds, and the increased level of competition for deposits, the Corporation has increased its other borrowings significantly over the past year. Included in the increase in other borrowed funds is an increase of $41,449 in repurchase agreements (see deposit discussion above). Management does anticipate that the Corporation will continue to increase its borrowings throughout 2009 (See Note 10 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements).

Corporation.

   Expiration Dates by Period 
       After One   After Three         
   Due in   Year But   Years But         
   One Year   Within   Within   After     
   or Less   Three Years   Five Years   Five Years   Total 

Unused commitments to extend credit

  $61,415    $27,740    $10,591    $3,076    $102,822  

Undisbursed loans

   21,806                    21,806  

Standby letters of credit

   4,461                    4,461  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total loan commitments

  $87,682    $27,740    $10,591    $3,076    $129,089  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Capital

The capital of the Corporation consists solelyprimarily of common stock, including shares to be issued, retained earnings, and accumulated other comprehensive income / (loss).income. The Corporation offers dividend reinvestment and employee, director, and directorshareholder stock purchase plans. Under the provisions of these Plans,plans, the Corporation issued 78,994115,359 shares of common stock generating $2,879$2,192 of capital during 2008,2011, and 63,233124,904 shares of common stock generating $2,657$2,203 of capital in 2007.2010. The Corporation also offers share-based payment awardsgenerates capital through the Isabella Bank Corporation and Related Companies Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors (the “Directors Plan”), its equity compensation plan (See Note 17 “Benefit Plans” of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements). Pursuant to this plan, the Corporation generated $603$615 and $758$650 of capital in 20082011 and 2007,2010, respectively.

In October 2002, the

The Board of Directors authorized managementhas adopted a common stock repurchase plan. This plan was approved to repurchase upenable the Corporation to $2,000 in dollar value ofrepurchase the Corporation’s common stock. In March 2007,stock for reissuance to the Board ofdividend reinvestment plan, the employee stock purchase plan and for distributions from the Directors amended this plan which allowed for the repurchase of up to 150,000 of additional shares. In MayPlan. During 2011 and July 2008 they further amended the plan to allow for the repurchase of an additional 25,000 and 5,000 shares, respectively. During 2008 and 2007,2010 the Corporation repurchased 148,336120,441 shares of common stock at an average price of $43.41$18.30 and 43,220138,970 shares of common stock at an average price of $43.51,$18.40, respectively. There were no shares repurchased in 2006.

Accumulated other comprehensive loss increased $5,303decreased $4,198 in 20082011 and consists of a $3,771 increase in$5,498 of unrealized lossgains on available-for-sale investment securities andwhich was offset by a $1,532$1,300 increase in unrecognized pension cost of the defined benefit pension plan.cost. These amounts are net of tax.

The Federal Reserve Board’s current recommended minimum primary capital to assets requirement is 6.0%. The Corporation’s primaryTier 1 capital to average assets ratio, which consists of shareholders’ equity plus the allowance


84


for loan losses less goodwill and acquisition intangibles, was 9.26%8.18% at year end 2008.December 31, 2011. There are no commitments for significant capital expenditures.

The Federal Reserve Board has established a minimum risk based capital standard. Under this standard, a framework has been established that assigns risk weights to each category of on and off-balance-sheet items to arrive at risk adjusted total assets. Regulatory capital is divided by the risk adjusted assets with the resulting ratio compared to the minimum standard to determine whether a corporation has adequate capital. The minimum standard is 8%, of which at least 4% must consist of equity capital net of goodwill.goodwill and acquisition intangibles. The following table sets forth the percentages required under the Risk Based Capital guidelines and the Corporation’s values at December 31, 2008:

Percentage of Capital to Risk Adjusted Assets:
         
  Isabella Bank Corporation
 
  December 31, 2008 
  Required  Actual 
 
Equity Capital  4.00%  12.27%
Secondary Capital  4.00%  1.25%
         
Total Capital
  8.00%  13.52%
         
31:

   2011  2010  Required 

Equity Capital

   12.92  12.72  4.00

Secondary Capital

   1.25  1.25  4.00
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total Capital

   14.17  13.97  8.00
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Isabella Bank Corporation’s secondary capital includes only the allowance for loan losses. The percentage for the secondary capital under the required column is the maximum amount allowed from all sources.

The Federal Reserve Board also prescribes minimum capital requirements for the Corporation’s subsidiary Bank. At December 31, 2008,2011, the Bank exceeded these minimums. For further information regarding the Bank’s capital requirements, refer to Note 16 of the Consolidated Financial Statements, “Minimum Regulatory Capital Requirements”.

of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements,

Fair Value

The Corporation utilizes fair value measurements to record fair value adjustments to certain assets and liabilities and to determine fair value disclosures. Securities available-for-sale, trading securities, and certain liabilities are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. Additionally, from time to time, the Corporation may be required to record at fair value other assets on a nonrecurring basis, such as loans held-for-sale, loans held for investment in foreclosed assets, originated mortgage servicing rights, and certain other assets and liabilities. These nonrecurring fair value adjustments typically involve the application of lower of cost or market accounting or write-downs of individual assets.

Fair Value Hierarchy
Under SFAS 157,

The table below represents the Corporation groups assets and liabilities at fair value into three levels, based on the marketsactivity in which the assets and liabilities are traded and the reliability of the assumptions used to determine fair value. These levels are:

• Level 1: Valuation is based upon quoted prices for identical instruments traded in active markets.
• Level 2: Valuation is based upon quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active, and model-based valuation techniques for which all significant assumptions are observable in the market.
• Level 3: Valuation is generated from model-based techniques that use at least one significant assumption not observable in the market. These unobservable assumptions reflect estimates of assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability.
Following is a description of the valuation methodologies used for assets and liabilities recorded at fair value.


85


Investment Securities:
Investment securities are recorded at fair valueLevel 3 inputs measured on a recurring basis. Fair value measurement is based upon quoted prices, if available. If quoted prices are not available, fair values are measured using independent pricing models or other model-based valuation techniques such as the present value of future cash flows, adjustedbasis for the security’s credit rating, prepayment assumptions and other factors such as credit loss and liquidity assumptions. Level 1 securities include those traded on an active exchange, such as the New York Stock Exchange, U.S. Treasury securities that are traded by dealers or brokers in active over-the-counter markets, mortgage-backed securities issued by government-sponsored entities and money market funds. Level 2 securities include municipal bonds and corporate debt securities in active markets. year ended December 31:

   2011  2010 

Level 3 inputs — January 1

  $9,801   $10,027  

Calls

   (1,000    

Transfer to Level 1 inputs

   (5,033    

Transfer to Level 2 inputs

   (2,049    

Net unrealized losses on available-for-sale investment securities

   (1,719  (226
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Level 3 inputs — December 31

  $   $9,801  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Securities classified as Level 3 includein 2010 included securities in less liquid markets including illiquid markets in some instances, and include certain municipal securities and money market preferred auction rate securities.

The Corporation has invested $11,000 inincluded auction rate money market preferred investment security instruments, which are classified as available-for-sale securities and reflected at fair value. Due to recent events and uncertainty in credit markets, these investments have become illiquid.
preferred stocks. Due to the current illiquiditylimited trading of these securities these assets were classified as Level 3 during 2008. The fair values of these securities were estimated utilizing2010, the Corporation utilized a discounted cash flow analysis or other type of valuation adjustment methodology as ofto determine fair values on December 31, 2008. These analyses consider, among other factors, the collateral underlying the security investments,2010. This analysis considered the creditworthiness of the counterparty, the timing of expected future cash flows, estimatesthe current volume of trading activity, and recent trade prices. The discount rates used were determined by using the next time the security is expected to have a successful auction, and the Corporation’s positive intent and ability to hold such securities until credit markets improve, as further described in Note 4interest rates of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Loans Available-for-Sale:
Loans available for sale are carried at the lower of cost or market value. The fair value of loans held-for-sale is based on what price secondary markets are currently offering for portfolios with similar characteristics. As such, the Company classifies loans subjected to nonrecurring fair value adjustments as Level 2.
Loans:
The Corporation does not record loans at fair value on a recurring basis. However, from time to time, a loan is considered impaired and an allowance for loan losses is established. Loans for which it is probable that payment of interest and principal will not be made in accordance with the contractual terms of the loan agreement are considered impaired. Once a loan is identified as individually impaired, management measures impairment in accordance with SFAS 114,Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan, (SFAS 114). The fair value of impaired loans is estimated using one of several methods, including collateral value, market value of similarsimilarly rated financial institution debt enterprise value, liquidation value and discounted cash flows. Those impaired loans not requiring an allowance represent loans for which the fair value of the expected repayments or collateral exceed the recorded investments in such loans. At December 31, 2008, impaired loans were evaluated based on the fair valueweighted average of the collateral or based on the net present valuea range of their expected cash flows. Impaired loans where an allowance is established based on the fair value of collateral require classification in the fair value hierarchy. When a current appraised value is not available or management determines the fair value of the collateral is further impaired below the appraised value and there is no observable market price, or the impairment is determined using the net present value of the expected cash flows, the Corporation classifies the impaired loan as nonrecurring Level 3.
Foreclosed Assets:
Upon transfer from the loan portfolio, foreclosed assets are adjusted to and subsequently carried at the lower of carrying value or fair value less costs to sell. Fair value is based upon independent market prices, appraised values of the collateral or management’s estimation of the value of the collateral. When a current appraised value is not available or management determines the fair value of the collateral is further impaired below the appraised value and there is no observable market price, the Corporation classifies the foreclosed asset as nonrecurring Level 3.


86


Equity Securities Without Readily Determinable Fair Values:
The Corporation has investments in equity securities without readily determinable fair values as well as an investment in a joint venture. The assets are individually reviewedterms for impairment on an annual basis by comparing the carrying value to the estimated fair value. The lack of an independent source to validate fair value estimates, including the impact of future capital calls and transfer restrictions, is an inherent limitation in the valuation process. The Corporation classifies nonmarketable equity securities and its investment in a joint venture subjected to nonrecurring fair value adjustments as Level 3. During 2008 and 2007, there were no impairments recorded on equity securities without readily determinable fair values.
Mortgage Servicing Rights:
Loan servicing rights are subject to impairment testing. A valuation model, which utilizes a discounted cash flow analysis usingcorporate bond interest rates, which were obtained from published sources and prepayment speed assumptions currently quoted for comparable instruments and a discount rate determined by management, is used for impairment testing. If the valuation model reflects a value less than the carrying value, mortgage servicing rights are adjustedranged from 3.90% to fair value through a valuation allowance as determined by the model. As such, the Corporation classifies loan servicing rights subjected to nonrecurring fair value adjustments as Level 2.
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets:
Goodwill and identified intangible assets are subject to impairment testing. A projected cash flow valuation method is used in the completion of impairment testing. This valuation method requires a significant degree of management judgment. In the event the projected undiscounted net operating cash flows are less than the carrying value, the asset is recorded at fair value as determined by the valuation model. If the testing resulted in impairment, the Corporation would classify goodwill and other intangible assets subjected to nonrecurring fair value adjustments as Level 3. During 2008 and 2007, there were no impairments recorded on goodwill and other intangible assets.
Other Borrowed Funds:
The Corporation has elected to measure a portion of other borrowed funds at their fair value. These borrowings are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis, with the fair value measurement being based upon quoted prices. Changes in the fair value of these borrowings are included in noninterest income. As such, the Corporation classifies other borrowed funds as Level 2.
During 2008, primarily as a result of declines in the rates offered on new residential mortgage loans, the Corporation recorded impairment charges of $115 related to the carrying value of its mortgage servicing rights, in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 156. This decline in offering rates decreased the expected lives of the loans serviced and in turn decreased the value of the serving rights.
The impairment charges to foreclosed assets were the result of the real estate held declining in value subsequent to the properties being transferred to other real estate.
Liquidity
The primary sources of the Corporation’s liquidity are cash and cash equivalents, trading securities, and available-for-sale investment securities, excluding money market preferred securities in 2008 due to their illiquidity6.90% as of

December 31, 2008. These categories totaled $285,805 or 25.0% of assets as of December 31, 2008 as compared to $263,774 or 27.6% in 2007. Liquidity is important2010. During 2011, the markets for financial institutions because of their need to meet loan funding commitments, depositor withdrawal requeststhese securities have normalized and various other commitments discussed in the accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements. Liquidity varies significantly daily, based on customer activity.

Operating activities provided $20,661 of cash in 2008 as compared to $60,387 in 2007. The reduction in net cash provided by operating activities was the result of the Corporation reducing itsestablished regular trading portfolio by $8,513 in 2008 as compared to $53,235 in 2007. Net cash provided by financing activities equaled $66,038 in 2008 and


87


$38,470 in 2007, and was primarily the result of increases in other borrowed funds during 2008. The Corporation’s investing activities used cash amounting to $88,728 in 2008 and $104,633 in 2007. The accumulated effect of the Corporation’s operating, investing, and financing activities used $2,029 and $5,776 of cash in 2008 and 2007, respectively.
The primary source of funds for the Bank is deposits. The Bank emphasizes interest-bearing time deposits as part of their funding strategy. The Bank also seeks noninterest bearing deposits, or checking accounts, which reduce the Bank’s cost of funds in an effort to expand the customer base.
In recent periods, the Corporation has experienced some competitive challenges in obtaining additional deposits to fuel growth. As depositors continue to have wider access to the Internet and other real-time interest rate monitoring resources, deposit sourcing and pricing has become more competitive. Deposit growth is achievable, but at a competitive price.patterns. As a result of this increased competition,normalization, the Corporation (as discussed above) has begun to rely moremeasured preferred stocks with fair values of $5,033 utilizing Level 1 inputs and moreauction rate money market preferred securities with fair values of $2,049 utilizing Level 2 inputs based on brokered, internet deposits, and other borrowed fundsthe trade price of similar securities as a key funding source.
In addition to these primary sources of liquidity, the Corporation has the ability to borrow from the Federal Home Loan Bank, the Federal Reserve Bank, and through various correspondent banks as fed funds. As of December 31, 2008, the Corporation had the capacity to borrow up to $50,809 from the Federal Home Loan Bank based upon the current Board2011.

For further information regarding fair value measurements see Note 1, “Nature of Director approved limits.. The Corporation’s liquidity is considered adequate by the managementOperations and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” and Note 20, “Fair Value” of the Corporation.

Consolidated Financial Statements.

Interest Rate Sensitivity

Interest rate sensitivity is determined by the amount of earning assets and interest bearing liabilities repricing within a specific time period, and their relative sensitivity to a change in interest rates. Management also strives to achieve reasonable stability in the net interest margin through periods of changing interest rates. One tool used by management to measure interest rate sensitivity is gap analysis. As shown in the following table, the gap analysis depicts the Corporation’s position for specific time periods and the cumulative gap as a percentage of total assets.

Investment

Trading securities and other investmentsare included in the 0 to 3 month time frame due to their repricing characteristics. Fixed interest rate investment securities are scheduled according to their contractual maturity. Fixed rate loans are included in the appropriate time frame based on their scheduled amortization. Variable rate loans, which totaled $162,653 as of December 31, 2011, are included in the time frame of their earliest repricing. Of the $735,385 in total loans, $156,389 are variable rate loans. Time deposit liabilities are scheduled based on their contractual maturity except for variable rate time deposits in the amount of $1,813$1,559 that are included in the 0 to 3 month time frame.

Savings, NOW accounts, and money market accounts have no contractual maturity date and are believed to be predominantly noninterest rate sensitive by management. These accounts have been classified in the gap table according to their estimated withdrawal rates based upon management’s analysis of deposit runoff over the past five years. Management believes this runoff experience is consistent with its expectation for the future. As of December 31, 2008,2011, the Corporation had $69,230 more liabilities than assets maturinga negative cumulative gap within one year. A negative gap position results when more liabilities, within a specified time frame, mature or reprice than assets.


88


Interest Rate Sensitivity
The following table shows the time periods and the amount of assets and liabilities available for interest rate repricing as of December 31, 2008.2011. The interest rate sensitivity information for investment securities is based on the expected prepayments and call dates versus stated maturities. For purposes of this analysis, nonaccrual loans and the allowance for loan losses are excluded.
                 
  0 to 3
  4 to 12
  1 to 5
  Over 5
 
  Months  Months  Years  Years 
 
Interest Sensitive Assets                
Trading securities $21,775  $  $  $ 
Investment securities  32,312   50,540   57,075   106,528 
Loans  187,926   94,142   384,450   57,692 
                 
Total
 $242,013  $144,682  $441,525  $164,220 
                 
Interest Sensitive Liabilities                
Borrowed funds $55,659  $39,500  $97,191  $30,000 
Time deposits  79,488   161,477   139,034   1,589 
Savings  36,670   35,706   110,147    
Interest bearing demand  28,114   19,311   66,548    
                 
Total
 $199,931  $255,994  $412,920  $31,589 
                 
Cumulative gap (deficiency) $42,082  $(69,230) $(40,625) $92,006 
Cumulative gap (deficiency) as a % of assets  3.69%  (6.08)%  (3.57)%  8.08%

   0 to 3  4 to 12  1 to 5  Over 5 
   Months  Months  Years  Years 

Interest sensitive assets

     

Trading securities

  $4,710   $   $   $  

Investment securities

   40,976    63,583    182,965    137,596  

Loans

   59,872    147,565    459,290    77,175  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

  $105,558   $211,148   $642,255   $214,771  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Interest sensitive liabilities

     

Borrowed funds

  $67,440   $22,429   $106,267   $20,000  

Time deposits

   74,500    191,206    208,779    7,052  

Savings

   19,591    47,365    103,845    23,101  

Interest bearing demand

   15,621    38,273    82,568    27,191  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

  $177,152   $299,273   $501,459   $77,344  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Cumulative gap

  $(71,594 $(159,719 $(18,923 $118,504  

Cumulative gap as a % of assets

   (5.35)%   (11.94)%   (1.41)%   8.86

The following table shows the maturity of commercial and agricultural loans outstanding at December 31, 2008.2011. Also provided are the amounts due after one year, classified according to the sensitivity to changes in interest rates.

                 
  Due in 
  1 Year
  1 to 5
  Over 5
    
  or Less  Years  Years  Total 
 
Commercial and agricultural $95,292  $262,546  $24,971  $382,809 
                 
Interest Sensitivity                
Loans maturing after one year that have:                
Fixed interest rates     $223,957  $23,425     
Variable interest rates      38,589   1,546     
                 
Total
     $262,546  $24,971     
                 

   1 Year   1 to 5   Over 5     
   or Less   Years   Years   Total 

Commercial and agricultural

  $120,463    $276,367    $43,529    $440,359  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Interest sensitivity

        

Loans maturing after one year that have:

        

Fixed interest rates

    $238,963    $32,178    

Variable interest rates

     37,404     11,351    
    

 

 

   

 

 

   

Total

    $276,367    $43,529    
    

 

 

   

 

 

   

Liquidity

Liquidity is monitored regularly by the Corporation’s Market Risk Committee, which consists of members of senior management. The committee reviews projected cash flows, key ratios, and liquidity available from both primary and secondary sources.

The primary sources of the Corporation’s liquidity are cash and cash equivalents, certificates of deposit held in other financial institutions, trading securities, and available-for-sale investment securities, excluding auction rate money market preferred securities and preferred stock as of December 31, 2010 due to their illiquidity. These categories totaled $467,344 or 34.9% of assets as of December 31, 2011 as compared to $360,677 or 29.4% in 2010. Liquidity is important for financial institutions because of their need to meet loan funding commitments, depositor withdrawal requests, and various other commitments discussed in the accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements. Liquidity varies significantly daily, based on customer activity.

The following table summarizes the Corporation’s sources and uses of cash for the years ended December 31:

   2011  2010  $Variance 

Net cash provided by operating activities

  $18,860   $26,521   $(7,661

Net cash used in investing activities

   (105,203  (103,877  (1,326

Net cash provided by financing activities

   96,824    70,983    25,841  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

   10,481    (6,373  16,854  

Cash and cash equivalents January 1

   18,109    24,482    (6,373
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents December 31

  $28,590   $18,109   $10,481  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

The primary source of funds for the Corporation is deposits. The Corporation emphasizes interest bearing time deposits as part of its funding strategy. The Corporation also seeks noninterest bearing deposits, or checking accounts, to expand its customer base, while reducing the Corporation’s cost of funds.

The Corporation has the ability to borrow from the Federal Home Loan Bank, the Federal Reserve Bank, and through various correspondent banks as federal funds purchased. These funding methods typically carry a higher interest rate than traditional market deposit accounts. Some borrowed funds, including Federal Home Loan Bank Advances, Federal Reserve Bank Discount Window Advances, and repurchase agreements, require the Corporation to pledge assets, typically in the form of certificates of deposits held in other financial institutions, investment securities, or loans as collateral.

The Corporation had the ability to borrow up to an additional $110,069, based on the assets currently pledged as collateral. The Corporation has pledged eligible mortgage loans and investment securities as collateral for any such borrowings.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

The Corporation’s primary market risks are interest rate risk and liquidity risk. The Corporation has no significant foreign exchange risk holds limited loans outstanding to oil and gas concerns, and does not utilize interest rate swaps or derivatives, except for interest rate locks and forward loan commitments, in the management of its interest rate risk. Any changes in foreign exchange rates or commodity prices would have an insignificant impact if any, on the Corporation’s interest income and cash flows. The Corporation does have a significant amount of loans extended to borrowers in agricultural production. The cash flow of such borrowers and ability to service debt is largely dependent on the commodity prices for corn, soybeans, sugar beets, milk, beef, and a variety of dry beans.prices. The Corporation mitigates these risks by using conservative price and production yields when calculating a borrower’s available cash flow to service their debt.

Interest rate risk (“IRR”) is the exposure of the Corporation’s net interest income, its primary source of income, to changes in interest rates. IRR results from the difference in the maturity or repricing frequency of a financial institution’s interest earning assets and its interest bearing liabilities. IRR is the fundamental method in which financial institutions earn income and create shareholder value. Excessive exposure to IRR could pose a significant risk to the Corporation’s earnings and capital.


89


The Federal Reserve Board, the Corporation’s primary Federal regulator, has adopted a policy requiring the Board of Directors and senior management to effectively manage the various risks that can have a material impact on the safety and soundness of the Corporation. The risks include credit, interest rate, liquidity, operational, and reputational. The Corporation has policies, procedures, and internal controls for measuring and managing these risks. Specifically, the IRR policy and procedures include defining acceptable types and terms of investments and funding sources, liquidity requirements, limits on investments in long term assets, limiting the mismatch in repricing opportunity of assets and liabilities, and the frequency of measuring and reporting to the Board of Directors.

The Corporation uses several techniques to manage IRR. The first method is gap analysis. Gap analysis measures the cash flowsand/or the earliest repricing of the Corporation’s interest bearing assets and liabilities. This analysis is useful for measuring trends in the repricing characteristics of the balance sheet. Significant assumptions are required in this process because of the imbedded repricing options contained in assets and liabilities. A substantial portion of the Corporation’s assets are invested in loans and investment securities with issuer call options. LoansResidential real estate and other consumer loans have imbedded options that allow the borrower to repay the balance prior to maturity without penalty.penalty, while commercial and agricultural loans have prepayment penalties. The amount of prepayments is dependent upon many factors, including the interest rate of a given loan in comparison to the current interest rate for residential mortgages, the level of sales of used homes, and the overall availability of credit in the market place. Generally, a decrease in interest rates will result in an increase in the Corporation’s cash flows from these assets. A significant portion of the Corporation’s securities are callable.callable or subject to prepayment. The call option is more likely to be exercised in a period of decreasing interest rates. Investment securities, other than those that are callable, do not have any significant imbedded options. Savings and checking deposits may generally be withdrawn on request without prior notice. The timing of cash flows from these deposits is estimated based on historical experience. Time deposits have penalties that discourage early withdrawals.

The second technique used in the management of IRR is to combine the projected cash flows and repricing characteristics generated by the gap analysis and the interest rates associated with those cash flows to project future interest income. By changing the amount and timing of the cash flows and the repricing interest rates of those cash flows, the Corporation can project the effect of changing interest rates on its interest income. Based on the projections prepared for the year ended December 31, 2008,2011, the Corporation’s net interest income would increasedecrease slightly during a period of decreasingincreasing interest rates.


90


The following tables provide information about the Corporation’s assets and liabilities that are sensitive to changes in interest rates as of December 31, 20082011 and 2007.2010. The Corporation has no interest rate swaps, futures contracts, or other derivative financial options. The principal amounts of assets and time deposits maturing were

calculated based on the contractual payment and maturity dates. Savings and NOW accounts are based on management’s estimate of their future cash flows.

                                 
  December 31, 2008  Fair Value
 
  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  Thereafter  Total  12/31/08 
  (Dollars in thousands) 
 
Rate sensitive assets                                
Other interest bearing assets $575  $  $  $  $  $  $575  $575 
Average interest rates  0.21%                 0.21%    
Trading securities $7,867  $4,902  $3,181  $2,937  $1,089  $1,799  $21,775  $21,775 
Average interest rates  3.89%  3.57%  3.47%  2.74%  2.90%  3.11%  3.49%    
Fixed interest rate securities $82,852  $13,043  $12,494  $11,247  $20,291  $106,528  $246,455  $246,455 
Average interest rates  4.68%  4.78%  4.25%  4.20%  3.74%  3.69%  4.15%    
Fixed interest rate loans $136,854  $105,529  $110,218  $80,163  $88,540  $57,692  $578,996  $598,703 
Average interest rates  6.73%  6.78%  6.90%  7.20%  6.86%  6.34%  6.82%    
Variable interest rate loans $61,795  $25,166  $16,524  $8,049  $27,505  $17,350  $156,389  $156,389 
Average interest rates  5.32%  4.75%  5.27%  5.34%  4.45%  5.90%  5.14%    
Rate sensitive liabilities                                
Borrowed funds $95,159  $39,191  $21,000  $22,000  $15,000  $30,000  $222,350  $230,130 
Average interest rates  1.11%  4.57%  3.63%  4.17%  3.93%  4.59%  2.92%    
Savings and NOW accounts $119,801  $79,465  $63,274  $25,140  $8,816  $  $296,496  $296,496 
Average interest rates  0.12%  0.27%  0.26%  0.20%  0.34%     0.20%    
Fixed interest rate time deposits $239,152  $62,838  $29,771  $21,565  $24,860  $1,589  $379,775  $385,478 
Average interest rates  3.47%  4.29%  4.55%  4.61%  4.18%  4.57%  3.81%    
Variable interest rate time deposits $1,187  $626  $  $  $  $  $1,813  $1,813 
Average interest rates  1.90%  1.67%              1.82%    
                                 
  December 31, 2007  Fair Value
 
  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  Thereafter  Total  12/31/07 
 
Rate sensitive assets                                
Other interest bearing assets $1,457  $  $  $  $  $  $1,457  $1,457 
Average interest rates  3.21%                 3.21%    
Trading securities $9,342  $2,213  $3,269  $2,750  $2,820  $4,670  $25,064  $25,064 
Average interest rates  4.86%  4.86%  4.20%  4.34%  3.50%  6.98%  4.96%    
Fixed interest rate securities $74,950  $24,122  $8,450  $8,082  $2,826  $94,697  $213,127  $213,127 
Average interest rates  5.54%  4.98%  4.57%  3.99%  4.13%  3.94%  4.65%    
Fixed interest rate loans $124,447  $99,132  $98,275  $78,152  $63,957  $58,037  $522,000  $523,454 
Average interest rates  6.72%  6.65%  6.87%  7.25%  7.28%  6.50%  6.86%    
Variable interest rate loans $41,596  $14,613  $18,792  $4,796  $6,435  $4,455  $90,687  $90,687 
Average interest rates  7.94%  7.67%  7.66%  7.52%  7.31%  7.56%  7.75%    
Rate sensitive liabilities                                
Borrowed funds $30,387  $6,500  $24,000  $  $17,000  $15,000  $92,887  $91,897 
Average interest rates  4.77%  4.34%  4.69%     4.19%  4.73%  4.61%    
Savings and NOW accounts $132,008  $71,320  $69,183  $23,972  $5,725  $  $302,208  $302,208 
Average interest rates  2.61%  1.15%  0.62%  0.59%  0.86%     1.62%    
Fixed interest rate time deposits $226,090  $33,477  $42,835  $23,067  $18,853  $137  $344,459  $346,528 
Average interest rates  4.61%  4.42%  4.53%  4.81%  4.63%  4.40%  4.60%    
Variable interest rate time deposits $1,375  $585  $  $  $  $  $1,960  $1,960 
Average interest rates  4.09%  4.10%              4.09%    


91


(dollars in thousands) December 31, 2011  Fair Value 
  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  Thereafter  Total  12/31/11 

Rate sensitive assets

        

Other interest bearing assets

 $8,775   $4,125   $100   $   $   $   $13,000   $13,053  

Average interest rates

  1.18  1.33  0.35              1.22 

Trading securities

 $3,156   $1,031   $523   $   $   $   $4,710   $4,710  

Average interest rates

  3.34  2.48  2.49     3.06 

Fixed interest rate securities

 $104,559   $61,421   $48,659   $37,777   $35,108   $137,596   $425,120   $425,120  

Average interest rates

  2.98  2.84  2.91  2.93  3.21  3.01  2.98 

Fixed interest rate loans

 $141,867   $140,390   $90,852   $75,690   $76,985   $61,854   $587,638   $606,524  

Average interest rates

  6.24  6.08  5.94  5.99  5.40  5.15  5.90 

Variable interest rate loans

 $70,783   $25,267   $20,803   $18,853   $11,631   $15,316   $162,653   $162,653  

Average interest rates

  5.87  3.97  4.05  3.68  4.00  3.98  4.78 

Rate sensitive liabilities

        

Borrowed funds

 $89,869   $15,000   $25,869   $45,398   $20,000   $20,000   $216,136   $227,780  

Average interest rates

  1.42  3.93  3.13  3.30  2.67  2.56  2.41 

Savings and NOW accounts

 $120,850   $78,313   $51,291   $34,006   $22,803   $50,292   $357,555   $357,555  

Average interest rates

  0.20  0.19  0.18  0.17  0.15  0.15  0.18 

Fixed interest rate time deposits

 $264,147   $62,883   $46,802   $55,493   $43,601   $7,052   $479,978   $498,085  

Average interest rates

  1.61  2.67  2.33  2.56  2.41  1.48  2.00 

Variable interest rate time deposits

 $1,152   $407   $   $   $   $   $1,559   $1,559  

Average interest rates

  0.67  0.69                  0.68 

  December 31, 2010  Fair Value 
  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  Thereafter  Total  12/31/10 

Rate sensitive assets

        

Other interest bearing assets

 $10,550   $5,429   $960   $   $   $   $16,939   $17,039  

Average interest rates

  0.96  1.82  2.16              1.30 

Trading securities

 $1,918   $2,366   $1,031   $522   $   $   $5,837   $5,837  

Average interest rates

  3.46  2.31  2.42  2.47          2.72 

Fixed interest rate securities

 $64,652   $42,984   $32,871   $29,395   $24,438   $136,384   $330,724   $330,724  

Average interest rates

  3.68  3.42  3.30  3.33  3.28  3.13  3.32 

Fixed interest rate loans

 $128,277   $121,434   $140,019   $67,423   $68,569   $66,010   $591,732   $603,435  

Average interest rates

  6.80  6.63  6.26  6.47  6.08  5.83  6.41 

Variable interest rate loans

 $59,536   $17,306   $22,523   $15,118   $18,830   $10,259   $143,572   $143,572  

Average interest rates

  4.94  4.76  4.27  3.78  3.69  5.21  4.55 

Rate sensitive liabilities

        

Borrowed funds

 $74,151   $33,013   $15,127   $37,087   $25,539   $10,000   $194,917   $200,603  

Average interest rates

  0.62  3.46  2.55  3.11  4.60  2.35  2.33 

Savings and NOW accounts

 $74,278   $73,818   $53,174   $35,872   $24,520   $58,414   $320,076   $320,076  

Average interest rates

  0.21  0.21  0.20  0.19  0.18  0.15  0.19 

Fixed interest rate time deposits

 $215,648   $113,338   $44,269   $31,414   $39,474   $6,278   $450,421   $452,392  

Average interest rates

  1.79  2.67  3.35  2.86  2.97  3.26  2.36 

Variable interest rate time deposits

 $1,279   $661   $   $   $   $   $1,940   $1,940  

Average interest rates

  1.21  1.06                  1.16 

Forward Looking Statements

This report contains certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The Corporation

intends such forward-looking statements to be covered by the safe harbor provisions for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Reform Act of 1995, and is including this statement for purposes of these safe harbor provisions. Forward-looking statements, which are based on certain assumptions and describe future plans, strategies and expectations of the Corporation, are generally identifiable by use of the words “believe,” “expect,” “intend,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “project,” or similar expressions. The Corporation’s ability to predict results or the actual effect of future plans or strategies is inherently uncertain. Factors which could have a material adverse effect on the operations and future prospects of the Corporation and the subsidiaries include, but are not limited to, changes in interest rates, general economic conditions, legislative/regulatory changes, monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. Government including policies of the U.S. Treasury, and the Federal Reserve Board, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the quality or composition of the loan or investment portfolios, demand for loan products, deposit flows, competition, demand for financial services in the Corporation’s market area, and accounting principles, policies and guidelines. These risks and uncertainties should be considered in evaluating forward-looking statements and undue reliance should not be placed on such statements. Further information concerning the Corporation and its business, including additional factors that could materially affect the Corporation’s financial results, is included in the Corporation’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

COMMON STOCK AND DIVIDEND INFORMATIONCommon Stock and Dividend Information

The Corporation’s common stock is traded in the over-the-counterover the counter market. The common stock has beenis quoted on the Pink Sheets Electronic Quotation Service (“Pink Sheets”)OTCQB tier of the OTC Markets Group, Inc.’s electronic quotation system (www.otcmarkets.com) under the symbol “ISBA” since August of 2008 and under the symbol IBTM prior to August of 2008.. Other trades in the common stock occur in privately negotiated transactions from time to time of which the Corporation may have little or may not be aware.

no information.

Management has reviewed the information available to it as to the range of reported high and low bid quotations, including high and low bid information as reported by Pink SheetsOTC Markets and closing price information as reported by the parties to privately negotiated transactions. The following table sets forth management’s compilation of that information for the periods indicated. Price information obtained from Pink SheetsOTC Markets reflects inter-dealerinter dealer prices, without retailmark-up, mark-down mark up, mark down or commissions and may not necessarily represent actual transactions. Price information obtained from parties to privately negotiated transactions reflects actual closing prices that were disclosed to the Corporation, which management has not independently verified. The following compiled data is provided for information purposes only and should not be viewed as indicative of the actual or market value of the Corporation’s common stock. All of the information has been adjusted to reflect the 10% stock dividend, paid February 29, 2008.

                 
  Number of
  Number of
  Sale Price 
Period
 Sales  Shares  Low  High 
 
2008                
First Quarter  109   107,920  $32.73  $44.00 
Second Quarter  89   50,600   39.00   44.00 
Third Quarter  50   29,303   33.00   40.00 
Fourth Quarter  80   71,855   22.50   36.50 
                 
   328   259,678         
                 
2007                
First Quarter  61   65,506   38.18   40.91 
Second Quarter  78   42,227   38.50   40.91 
Third Quarter  66   59,752   38.41   40.45 
Fourth Quarter  65   24,597   38.18   40.00 
                 
   270   192,082         
                 


92


   Number of   Sale Price 
   Shares   Low   High 

2011

      

First Quarter

   48,909    $17.00    $19.75  

Second Quarter

   65,090     17.00     18.50  

Third Quarter

   92,953     17.41     18.95  

Fourth Quarter

   106,210     17.74     24.45  
  

 

 

     
   313,162      
  

 

 

     

2010

      

First Quarter

   45,695    $16.75    $19.00  

Second Quarter

   64,290     17.00     18.50  

Third Quarter

   53,897     16.05     17.99  

Fourth Quarter

   56,534     16.57     18.30  
  

 

 

     
   220,416      
  

 

 

     

The following table sets forth the cash dividends paid for the following quarters, adjusted for the 10% stock dividend paid on February 29, 2008.
         
  Per Share 
  2008  2007 
 
First Quarter $0.12  $0.11 
Second Quarter  0.12   0.11 
Third Quarter  0.12   0.11 
Fourth Quarter  0.29   0.29 
         
Total
 $0.65  $0.62 
         
quarters:

   Per Share 
   2011   2010 

First Quarter

  $0.19    $0.18  

Second Quarter

   0.19     0.18  

Third Quarter

   0.19     0.18  

Fourth Quarter

   0.19     0.18  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $0.76    $0.72  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Isabella Bank Corporation’s authorized common stock consists of 15,000,000 shares, of which 7,518,8567,589,226 shares are issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2008.2011. As of that date, there were 2,9793,043 shareholders of record.

The Board of Directors has authorized a common stock repurchase plan. On March 22, 2007,April 27, 2011, the Board of Directors adopted a repurchaseamended the plan which allows for the repurchase of up to 150,000 shares of the Corporation’s issued and outstanding common stock. This plan was amended in May 2008 to allow for the repurchase of an additional 25,000 shares. The plan was further amended to allow for an additional 5,000100,000 shares to be repurchased in July 2008.of the Corporation’s common stock. These authorizations do not have expiration dates. As shares are repurchased under this plan, they are retired and revert back to the status of authorized, but unissued shares. This authorization does not have an expiration date.

The following table provides information as offor the three month period ended December 31, 2008,2011, with respect to this plan:

Total Number of
Shares Purchased
Maximum Number of
Shares Repurchasedas Part of Publicly
Shares That May Yet Be
Average Price
Announced Plan
Purchased Under the
NumberPer Shareor ProgramPlans or Programs
Balance, September 30, 20081,044
October 1 — 31, 2008$1,044
November 1 — 30, 20081,044
December 1 — 31, 20081,044
Balance, December 31, 2008
$1,044

           

Total Number of

Shares Purchased

as Part of Publicly

Announced Plan

     
             

Maximum Number of

Shares That May Yet Be

Purchased Under the

 
   Shares Repurchased     
       Average Price     
   Number   Per Share   or Program   Plans or Programs 

Balance, September 30, 2011

         62,729  

October 1 — 31, 2011

   7,934    $18.78     7,934     54,795  

November 1 — 30, 2011

   1,481     19.58     1,481     53,314  

December 1 — 31, 2011

   34,318     18.50     34,318     18,996  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance, December 31, 2011

   43,733    $18.59     43,733     18,996  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Information concerning Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans appears under “Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Shareholder Matters” included elsewhere in thisthe Corporation’s annual report onForm 10-K.


93


Stock Performance

The following graph compares the cumulative total shareholder return on Corporation common stock for the last five years with the cumulative total return on (1) the NASDAQ Stock Market Index (“NASDAQ”), which is comprised of all United States common shares traded on the NASDAQ and (2) the NASDAQ Bank Stock Index (“NASDAQ Banks”), which is comprised of bank and bank holding company common shares traded on the NASDAQ over the same period. The graph assumes the value of an investment in the Corporation and each index was $100 at December 31, 20032006 and all dividends are reinvested.

Stock Performance

Five-Year Total Return

(PERFORMANCE GRAPH)

LOGO

The dollar values for total shareholder return plotted in the graph above are shown in the table below:

Comparison of Five Year Cumulative

Among Isabella Bank Corporation, NASDAQ Stock Market,

and NASDAQ Bank Stock

             
  Isabella Bank
     NASDAQ
 
Year
 Corporation  NASDAQ  Banks 
 
12/31/2003  100.0   100.0   100.0 
12/31/2004  117.2   109.1   113.4 
12/31/2005  124.7   111.4   111.2 
12/31/2006  139.2   122.9   126.4 
12/31/2007  141.4   136.0   101.6 
12/31/2008  92.1   81.6   80.0 


94


Year

  Isabella Bank
Corporation
  NASDAQ  NASDAQ
Banks

12/31/2006

  100.0  100.0  100.0

12/31/2007

  101.6  110.6  80.4

12/31/2008

  66.1  66.6  63.3

12/31/2009

  51.0  96.6  52.9

12/31/2010

  48.5  114.0  60.4

12/31/2011

  69.1  113.1  54.0

SHAREHOLDERS’ INFORMATION

Annual Meeting

The Annual Meeting of Shareholders will be held at 5:00 p.m., Tuesday, May 5, 2009,1, 2012, Comfort Inn, 2424 S. Mission Street, Mt. Pleasant, Michigan.

Financial Information andForm 10-K

Copies of the 20082011 Annual Report, Isabella Bank CorporationForm 10-K, and other financial information not contained herein are available on the Bank’s website (www.isabellabank.com) under the Investor Relations tab, or may be obtained, without charge, by writing to:

Debra Campbell

Debra Campbell

Secretary

Isabella Bank Corporation

401 N. Main St.

Mt. Pleasant, Michigan 48858

Mission Statement

The mission of Isabella Bank Corporation shall be:

To create an operating environment that will provide shareholders with sustained growth in their investment while maintaining our independence and subsidiaries’ autonomy.

Equal Employment Opportunity

The equal employment opportunity clauses in Section 202 of the Executive Order 11246, as amended; 38 USC 2012, Vietnam Era Veterans Readjustment Act of 1974; Section 503 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; relative to equal employment opportunity and implementing rules and regulations of the Secretary of Labor are adhered to and supported by Isabella Bank Corporation, and its subsidiaries.


95


PROXY CARD

ISABELLA BANK CORPORATION PROXY
401 North Main Street
Mt. Pleasant, MI 48858
THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

The undersigned hereby appoints Sandra L. Caul, Theodore W. Kortes,Jeffrey J. Barnes, James C. Fabiano, and Dale D. WeburgJoseph LaFramboise as proxies, each with the power to appoint his/her substitute, and hereby authorizes them to represent and to vote as designated below, all the shares of Common Stock of Isabella Bank Corporation held of record bythat the undersigned on April 1, 2009is eligible to vote as of March 28, 2012 at the annual meeting of shareholders to be held on May 5, 20091, 2012 or any adjournments thereof.

PROPOSAL 1—ELECTION OF DIRECTORS: Proposal to elect the following three (3) persons as directors. Please mark the appropriate box for each director-nominee.

         FOR                  
1)
AGAINST        
  ELECTION OF DIRECTORS:WITHHOLD AUTHORITY
Richard J. Barz 
¨  FOR ALL NOMINEES LISTED BELOWq¨  WITHHOLD AUTHORITY TO VOTEq¨
Sandra L. Caul EXCEPT AS MARKED TO THE¨  FOR ALL NOMINEES LISTED
¨  CONTRARY BELOW¨
W. Michael McGuire ¨¨¨
(INSTRUCTION: To withhold authority to vote for any individual nominee, circle the nominee’s name in the list below.)
Dennis P. AngnerDavid J. ManessW. Joseph ManifoldWilliam J. Strickler
(continued and to be signed on other side)

This proxy, when properly executed, will be voted in the manner directed herein by the undersigned shareholder. IF NO DIRECTION IS MADE, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED TO ELECT ALL NOMINEES.“FOR THE NOMINEES LISTED UNDER PROPOSAL 1”. The shares represented by this proxy will be voted in the discretion of the proxies on any other matters which may come before the meeting.

Please sign below as your name appears on the label.below. When shares are held by joint tenants, both should sign. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, trustee or guardian, please give full title as such. If a corporation, please sign full corporate name by the President or other authorized officer. If a partnership, please sign in partnership name by authorized person.

  

  
Dated: ______________________________, 2009___________________________________________________
Please mark, sign, date and return
Proxy card promptly using the
enclosed envelope., 2012
              Signature  

Please mark, sign, date, and return

Proxy card promptly using the enclosed envelope.

  ___________________________________________________

  
              Signature (if held jointly)